✍️ شعر حافظ دربارهی اینترنت! 🔸 این فیلم را در یوتیوب آسو ببینید. @NashrAasoo 🎥
👍7❤5👎4👏1

Channel
@NashrAasoo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,502subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001009439798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NashrAasoo |
| Description | @Nashraasoo فرهنگ، اجتماع و نگاهی عمیقتر به مباحث امروز تماس با ما: 📩 [email protected] 🔻🔻🔻 آدرس سایت: aasoo.org اینستاگرام: instagram.com/NashrAasoo فیسبوک: fb.com/NashrAasoo توییتر: twitter.com/NashrAasoo |
| Created | 4 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NashrAasoo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 29,502 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 29,512 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 29,513 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 29,517 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 29,531 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 29,530 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 29,527 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 29,530 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 29,527 | -3 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 29,530 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,220 |
| Reactions total | 268 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
268 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 171 | 63.8% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 13.4% | |
| 😢 | 30 | 11.2% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 5.22% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 4.10% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 2.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NashrAasoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✍️ شعر حافظ دربارهی اینترنت! 🔸 این فیلم را در یوتیوب آسو ببینید. @NashrAasoo 🎥
👍7❤5👎4👏1
یک کتاب: «نفرین جالوت: تاریخ و آیندهی فروپاشی اجتماعی» عرفان ثابتی ــ سپهر عاطفی «در این قسمت از پادکست «یک کتاب» در گفتوگو با عرفان ثابتی، پژوهشگر علوم اجتماعی، به معرفی کتاب نفرین جالوت: تاریخ و آیندهی فروپاشی اجتماعی، نوشتهی لوک کمپ، میپردازیم.» ▪️پادکستها و نسخهی شنیداری مقالات ما را در وبسایت آسو و همچنین در شبکههای اجتماعی و اپهای پادخوان با شناسهی NashrAasoo بشنوید. [Castbox] [Google] [Spotify…
❤8👍2
«آیا امپراتوریها برای اکثر مردم رفاه به ارمغان میآوردند و فروپاشیِ آنها واقعاً زیانبار بود؟ آیا میتوان از «عصر زرین» تمدنها سخن گفت؟ منظور از «نگاه یک درصدی به تاریخ» چیست؟ آیا فروپاشی صرفاً معلول ساختارهای سیاسی است یا ریشه در رفتار افراد دارد؟ نابرابری چه نقشی در فروپاشی دارد؟ چطور میتوان از «فروپاشیِ جهانی» جلوگیری کرد؟» aasoo.org/fa/podcast/5420 @NashrAasoo 🔻
❤4👍3
فروغ فرخزاد و کودکانِ بندرِ جنگ، بندرِ صلح در ایتالیا ✍️ هادی کیکاووسی 🔸به مناسبت هفتادمین سالِ حضور فروغ فرخزاد در بندر بریندیزی «در سایهی انجیری مینشینم. همه جا انجیر است. از دل تمام سنگها انجیر روییده. فروغ گمشده. در جستجوی چه بود که گم شد؟ چرا فرشتهی پیروزی بازو ندارد؟ آتش بادی از دل کوچهها بیرون میزند. سرگیجه دارم. گوشیام روشن نمیشود. ما در وضعیت نارنجی هستیم. پیرمرد و پیرزنی عصازنان رد میشوند. بهشا…
❤24👍5
«پیرمردی که قرار بود مرا به فروغ برساند در کوچه پس کوچههای محلهی کازاله بریندیزی مقابلم ظاهر شد. از شب قبل اخطار دادهاند که سالمندان بیرون نیایند. آب بخورند. وضعیت نارنجی است. هوا نارنجی است. پیرمرد در این هوا بیرون زده. میپرسم: چند سالتان است؟ میگوید: هشتاد و دو. پرینت عکس فروغ را مقابلش میگیرم. از صبح به همه نشان دادهام. میگویم هفتاد سال پیش در چنین روزی این شاعر ایرانی وارد شهر شما شد و همراه دستهای کودک …
❤12
مجموعهای از نقاشیهای مهرنوش بادپر این روزها در شبکههای اجتماعی مورد توجه قرار گرفته و واکنشهای مثبت و منفی بسیاری را برانگیخته است. او در آثارش جهانی را تصویر میکند که در آن زندگی روزمره به صحنهای از کشمکش، نظارت، اضطراب، فشار و طنز تبدیل شده است. موضوع آثار او موقعیتهایی کاملاً آشناست: سفر با اتوبوس، حضور در درمانگاه، نشستن در اتاق پذیرایی، پیادهروی در پارک، حضور در آشپزخانه، و در یک نقاشی هم تماشای زندگی دی…
❤32👍10👎6
«هم در تو گریزم ار گریزم»؛ نیچه و فضیلت ایرج قانونی ✍️ نیچه به وضوح در کارهای اولیهاش همچون سپیدهدم ستیزهاش را با اخلاق عیان میکند، دستورات اخلاقی از افراد میخواهند که آنها را رعایت کنند بدون اینکه در فکر خویش به عنوان یک فرد باشند. او این کار را نه تربیت نفس که انکارِ خود میداند. اما با تأمل در آراء نهاییاش و تحلیل دقیق پارهای از آخرین یادداشتهایش در مییابیم که او ملاحظاتی در اصول اخلاقی دارد و معیارهایی …
❤17👍6👏5👎1
نیچه منتقدِ بیرحمِ اخلاقِ قراردادی است. او توسل جستن افراد به اصول اخلاقی را برای توجیه اعمال و رفتار خود حیله و نیرنگ میداند. از دیدِ او اخلاق چیزی جز اطاعت از رسم و عادت نیست (سپیدهدم)، ابزار مطیع کردن و کنترل افراد است. او در «غروب بتها» سخت به سقراط میتازد و فیلسوف پرحرمتِ اخلاق را از نظر اخلاقی فردی منحط و موجب فروپاشی یونان و آدمی بدجنس میخواند که از «وحشیگریِ خود» در «کاردپرانیِ قیاسِ منطقی» لذت فراوان م…
❤10👍3
مقبرهی میرزا جهانگیرخان صوراسرافیل و ملکالمتکلمین دو روزنامهنگار و خطیب مشروطهخواه که به دار آویخته شدند، ساختمان کوچک و سادهای در تهران است که از سالها پیش در دست مرمت بوده اما هنوز مخروبهای از یاد رفته به نظر میرسد. aasoo.org/fa/notes/3330 @NashrAasoo 💭
😢27💔13❤6
نمایش رقص کاروان و حضور زنان بر صحنهی نمایش عمومی در ایران سوما نگهدارینیا «با آغاز دوران پهلوی اول و پروژهی مدرنیزاسیون، تلاش شد تا با کشف حجاب، حضور فیزیکی زن در فضای عمومی بازتعریف شود. اما در دهههای بعد این حضور در نسبت با رقص زنان بار دیگر با چالش روبرو شد. در دههی ۱۹۴۰ در کافههای مرکز تهران و لالهزار، رقص موسوم به کابارهای رواج یافت که در آن زنان در همراهی با گروه موسیقی برای مشتریان در فضای بستهی ک…
❤37😢3💔1
«سال ۱۹۴۶، بر صحنهی یک تئاتر عمومی در تهران، سه زن به نامهای نِستا رمضانی، هایده احمدزاده و ویلما پروتیوا برای اجرای رقصی با عنوان کاروان ظاهر شدند. این اجرا نقطهی عطفی در تاریخ حضور زنان بر صحنهی نمایش در ایران به شمار میآمد؛ چرا که تا پیش از آن، حضور زنانی از اقشار متوسط و تحصیلکرده در فضای عمومی تحت عنوان رقصنده، عملاً ممکن نبود اما اجرای نمایش رقص کاروان در واقع واکنشی بود به قرنها دگردیسی، حذف و استحالهی…
❤16
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @NashrAasoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 36,973 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aasoo - آسو” (@NashrAasoo), 29,502 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NashrAasoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.