Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 27% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -469. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,991–29,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 15:07
29,061
-1
9 Nov 2026, 18:48
29,062
-12
8 Nov 2026, 10:16
29,074
-1
7 Nov 2026, 07:47
29,075
-7
6 Nov 2026, 03:46
29,082
-7
5 Nov 2026, 05:35
29,089
-3
4 Nov 2026, 05:10
29,092
-10
3 Nov 2026, 06:34
29,102
-4
2 Nov 2026, 09:46
29,106
-11
1 Nov 2026, 11:19
29,117
-2
31 Oct 2026, 07:46
29,119
-1
30 Oct 2026, 11:16
29,120
-7
29 Oct 2026, 12:55
29,127
-5
28 Oct 2026, 10:44
29,132
-11
27 Oct 2026, 07:59
29,143
-10
26 Oct 2026, 07:07
29,153
+1
25 Oct 2026, 07:35
29,152
-2
24 Oct 2026, 09:17
29,154
-3
23 Oct 2026, 12:47
29,157
-4
22 Oct 2026, 14:16
29,161
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 162 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 29,061 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,090
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.824%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
63 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
49,490
Reactions total
408
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 01:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,230
Videos
≈434
Links
≈6,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
53m 26s
Average length
8m 54s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,425 reactions across 62 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
812
57.0%
👍
351
24.6%
💔
126
8.84%
😢
62
4.35%
👏
44
3.09%
👎
30
2.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,425 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 62 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NashrAasoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ارمنیان ایران، تاریخی که باید از نو بخوانیم
سیروس علینژاد
ما اکنون با کتاب آقای صافاریان یک تاریخ واقعی از ایرانیان ارمنی یا ارامنهی ایران در دست داریم که هرچند نامش را متواضعانه «مقدمهای بر تاریخ ارمنیان ایران گذاشته اما بیرحمانه و با چشم باز همهی دردها و رنجهای آنان را در خود منعکس کرده است و اگر بخواهیم با آنان زندگی کنیم باید بر تمام رنجهای گذشتهشان مرهم بگذاریم و بدانها امکان دهیم حداقل مانند بقیه در ا…
«سرتاسر کتاب «تاریخ ارمنیان ایران»، نوشتهی روبرت صافاریان که از مهاجرت بزرگ دورهی شاه عباس شروع میشود و تا امروز ادامه مییابد، مشحون از صحنههای دلخراش و دلتنگیهای ویرانی است که خون به جگر خواننده میکند، و در عین حال او را از پایداری و جان سختی نوع بشر به شگفتی میاندازد. گذشته از رنجهای بیرونی مهمترین مبحثی که در بیشتر صفحات کتاب به چشم میآید، یک رنج درماننشدنیِ درونی است که نامش وطن است؛ اینکه زندگی من در…
پاسخ دادن به سؤالاتی دربارهی ایران ۱۴۲۰ برایم خیلی سخت است، پانزده سال دیگر هشتادوپنجساله خواهم بود و نمیدانم آیا زنده خواهم بود و چه کاری میتوانم انجام دهم. اما امیدوارم ایران ۱۴۲۰ را ببینم و با اینکه در هشتادوپنجسالگی خیلی از امکانها محدود میشوند، در ساختن آن نقشی داشته باشم.
وقتی به ایران ۱۴۲۰ فکر میکنم، دلم میخواهد صبح که از خواب بیدار میشوم، در آرامش و صلح باشم و نگران بیثباتی، بحران و مسائل روزمره نب…
سرزمین مادری و «خانه» را از دست دادن به چه معنا است؟ آیا معنای «غربت» تنها ترک کردن سرزمین مادری است یا میتواند هزار معنای پیچیدهی دیگر ــ از حس بیگانگی و از دست رفتن بخشی از هویت گرفته تا دلتنگی برای زبان و بوها و صداهای آشنا ــ داشته باشد؟ در دوری از وطن با انبوه خاطرات گذشته چه میکنیم؟ آیا فراموشی ناگزیر است و راه بقا چنگ زدن به خاطرات خانه است که بقا را ممکن میکند؟ اینها بخشی از مفاهیمی است که سنان انطون، …
رویاندن همدلی از دل تفاوتها؛ اهالی ماگنولیا: آخرین رمان زویا پیرزاد
بهروز اخلاقی
مهمترین تفاوت «اهالی ماگنولیا» با کتابهای قبلی پیرزاد شاید تغییر مکان ماجراهای کتاب باشد. برخلاف دو رمان قبلی که ماجرایشان در ایران و در فضا و موقعیتهای بسیار نزدیک و آشنا برای خوانندگان داخل کشور میگذشت، رمان جدید به زندگی مهاجران اختصاص دارد: ایرانیانی که هر کدام به دلیلی از ایران رفته و در خیابانی به نام ماگنولیا، واقع در لندن، …
انتشار رمان اهالی ماگنولیا را میتوان یکی از مهمترین رخدادهای ادبی ایران در ماههای اخیر دانست. وقتی نویسندهای پرطرفدار پس از سالها سکوت دوباره دست به قلم میبرد و کتابی را روانهی بازار میکند طبیعی است دوستدارانش در عطش آن باشند که سردرآورند در این فاصلهی طولانی چه در ذهن او میگذشته و او چگونه آن را بر صفحهی کتاب آورده است.
aasoo.org/index.php/fa/articles/5459
@NashrAasoo 🔻
امروز در شرایطی با هم صحبت میکنیم که واژههای «رنج» و «بیداد» برای مردم ایران دیگر مفاهیمی انتزاعی نیست. رنج و بیداد نام و چهره دارد، خانه و محله دارد، پدر و مادر و فرزند دارد. در زندانها و گورستانها دیده میشود؛ در خانههای ویران شده و چشمان اشکبار کسانی که دیگر امیدی به آینده ندارند. امروز، وطن ما مجروح است، از اضطراب جنگ، از سرکوب و خشونت، از فقر و فساد و استیصال.
aasoo.org/index.php/fa/articles/5461
@NashrAas…
بر اساس ارزیابیِ واژهنامهی آکسفورد، صفت «منحط» در زبان انگلیسیِ مکتوب امروزی کاربرد اندکی دارد و میانگین مصرف آن تنها حدود ۰.۰۳ بار در هر میلیون کلمه است. ]به عبارت دیگر، باید تقریباً ۳۳.۳ میلیون کلمه بخوانید تا یک بار با این واژه مواجه شوید.[ نمودار ردیابیِ میزان استفاده از این واژه نشان میدهد که کاربرد آن در مقایسه با دوران اوجش در اواخر قرن هجدهم میلادی به شدت کاهش یافته است. با این حال، اگر به اولین کتاب دِیز…
ابراهیم علیپور، عکاس مستند اجتماعی اهل بانه، بیش از ۱۵ سال است که زندگی و تحولات اجتماعی را با دوربین خود ثبت میکند، مسیری که از دوربین آنالوگ پدرش در روستاهای دورافتادهی کردستان آغاز شد و به یکی از مهمترین جوایز عکاسی مستند جهان رسید.
او در ابتدا برای پیدا کردن سوژههای فوتواستوری به سفرهای طولانی روی آورد و با دوچرخه به کشورهای مختلف رفت، اما بهتدریج نگاهش به داستانهای پیرامون خودش معطوف شد؛ از مرز و کولبران …
ایران بیست سال بعد را چگونه تصور میکنیم؟ چه تغییرهایی در ایرانِ آینده میخواهیم؟ چه سهمی خود ما میتوانیم در ایجاد این تغییرها داشته باشیم؟ این مجموعه، پاسخهاییست از مخاطبین آسو، و از گفتوگوهایی دربارهی آینده که در ماههای اخیر گردآوری کردیم.
aasoo.org/fa/articles/5456
@NashrAasoo 💭
غلام، تو را چه هنری است؟ دیوژن: هنرِ دستور دادن، هنرِ فرمانروایان
ایرج قانونی
فرمانروای حقیقی یعنی کسی که نخست فرمانروای خویش است، برخلاف میلِ خود به خود حکم میکند که نخور و نیاشام تا شامگاه، به خود دستور میدهد که در زمان خشم زبان در کام کش، تخم کین مکار.
@NashrAasoo 💭
روزنامهنگاریِ «منظوم »، از نسیم شمال تا اصغر آقا
سیروس علینژاد
تصور من این است که روزنامهنگاری منظوم ایران در همان دورهها یعنی در دورهی زندگی همان چهار شاعر آزادی به اوج رسیده، و بعدها، اگر راه و روش آنان در روزنامهنگاری ایران ادامه یافته، هرگز به گستردگی آن دوران نبوده است. ضمناً نباید فراموش کرد که شاعران دوران مشروطه یا اواخر دورهی قاجار در کار فاصله گرفتن از مدح امیران و صله گرفتن از پادشاهان و گریختن از …
❤15👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @NashrAasoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ماجرای مشروطه با امیر خادم @mashrutehwithAmirKhadem · 28,283 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
جامعهشناسی @iransociology · 37,367 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
اندیشه @andiiishe · 33,117 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى @tarjomaanweb · 77,239 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
ﻣﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ Mana Neyestani @mananey · 20,290 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری @DrAzarakhshMokri · 203,238 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
minimalha @MinimalForLife · 24,694 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
Honaragah(ادبیات،هنر،سینما) @honaragah · 25,046 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
سخنرانیها @sokhanranihaa · 132,197 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Hossein Ronaghi - حسین رونقی @hosseinronaghi · 18,407 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026
تاریخاندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی @tarikhandishi · 111,323 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
باشگاه ادبیات @BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,720 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
بهمن دارالشفایی @bahmanshafa · 24,685 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
رادیو چهرازی و ... 🎧📚🎬 @radio_chehraziii · 63,133 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
پروژه تاریخ شفاهی ایران در دانشگاه هاروارد @tarikh_shafahi_iran_project · 58,229 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
کافه روانشناسی @caferavanshenasi · 40,244 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
سید مهدی موسوی @seyedmehdimoosavi2 · 23,137 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
شفیعی کدکنی @shafiei_kadkani · 44,376 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor @PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,118 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Dr Sargolzaee podcast @drsargolzaeipodcast · 23,690 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
آتیه آفرینان | مرکز تخصصی امور مهاجرت @applyabroadnow · 26,719 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
دیپلماسی @Bestdiplomacy · 19,746 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 September 2026
آموزشکده توانا @Tavaana_TavaanaTech · 47,470 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
اتاق آینده / شیرعلینیا @jafarshiralinia · 44,010 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aasoo - آسو” (@NashrAasoo), 29,061 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NashrAasoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.