Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TechRasa فارسی

@TechRasaFarsi

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,680subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001093009214
TypeChannel
Username@TechRasaFarsi
Descriptionرشد فردی و حرفه‌ای رهبران و کارآفرینان آینده TechRasa.com/fa
Created17 August 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TechRasaFarsi

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,6757,6817,6786 August 2026 — 7,681 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,681 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,680 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,675 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,680 subscribers7,6806 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,674–7,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:457,680+5
9 Aug 2026, 05:017,675-5
6 Aug 2026, 09:407,680-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:067,681no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:287,681first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.00%
avg views ÷ 7,680 subscribers
Avg views / post
615
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.301%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held16 (19 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total9,833
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,830
Videos
231
Links
1,610

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 13s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1453.8%
👍623.1%
👌415.4%
👎13.85%
🔥13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC269 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightPhoto

🔹 چه چیزی باعث رشد ۱۵۰ برابری تأمین مالی جمعی شده است؟ 🔹 سکوهای تأمین مالی جمعی مبتنی بر بدهی از سال ۱۴۰۰ تا ۱۴۰۳ در مجموع بیش از ۱۷ هزار میلیارد تومان سرمایه جذب کرده‌اند. مبلغ سرمایه جذب‌شده سالانه نیز حدود ۱۵۰ برابر شده و تعداد طرح‌های ثبت‌شده از ۳۵ به ۷۷۶ طرح رسیده است. 🔹 بخشی از این رشد را می‌توان به افزایش نیاز کسب‌وکارها به منابع مالی و محدودتر شدن دسترسی به تسهیلات بانکی نسبت داد؛ عواملی که تأمین مالی جمعی

👌1👍1

10 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC367 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightVideo

🔹همه رفتارها و واکنش‌های ما نتیجه تصمیم‌گیری آگاهانه نیستند. گاهی محیط، تکرار و تجربه، رفتار و تصمیم ما را شکل می‌دهند. 🔹فرشاد فاطمی، استاد اقتصاد دانشگاه شریف، در رویداد «فین‌تک ایران ۱۴۰۴» درباره علوم رفتاری و آموزه‌های آن برای فین‌تک‌ها صحبت کردند. 🔗ویدئو کامل این سخنرانی را می‌توانید در یوتیوب تکراسا ببینید: https://youtu.be/g_e-NINbFNA @techrasafarsi

👍1

8 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC505 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightPhoto

🔹حدود ۶۸٪ از دارایی‌های تحت مدیریت پلتفرم‌های آنلاین دارایی، در اختیار ۴ بازیگر اصلی است. 🔹 بررسی ارزش دارایی تحت مدیریت پلتفرم‌‌های آنلاین دارایی در سال ۱۴۰۳ نشان می‌دهد بازار ساختاری نسبتاً متمرکز دارد. 🔹 مفید اپ با سهم ۲۷٪ در صدر قرار گرفته و پس از آن چند بازیگر دیگر با فاصله قابل‌توجه قرار دارند. 🔹در بازار پلتفرم‌های آنلاین دارایی، معیار رقابت فقط تعداد کاربران نیست؛ حجم دارایی تحت مدیریت یکی از شاخص‌های اصلی

3

6 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC575 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightPhoto

🔹️بزرگ‌ترین بازار سرمایه‌گذاری ایران کدام است؟ 🔹بازارهای سرمایه‌گذاری ایران از نظر اندازه، فاصله چشمگیری با یکدیگر دارند. اوراق بهادار و صندوق‌های سرمایه‌گذاری در صدر این مقایسه قرار گرفته‌اند؛ درحالی‌که بازارهایی مانند طلای آنلاین و تأمین مالی جمعی هنوز گردش مالی بسیار کوچک‌تری دارند. 🔹اما اندازه بازار فقط بخشی از ماجراست. میزان دیجیتالی‌شدن، نفوذ خدمات آنلاین، ساختار درآمدی، شدت رقابت و محدودیت‌های قانونی نیز تعی

3👎1

5 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC588 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightPhoto

🔹در سال ۱۴۰۳، کدام بازارها توانستند از تورم جلو بزنند؟ 🔹با نرخ تورم حدود ۴۵٪، طلا، بیت‌کوین و دلار تنها بازارهایی بودند که بازدهی بالاتر از تورم ثبت کردند. بازدهی این سه بازار به‌ترتیب ۲۴۸٪، ۱۰۷٪ و ۶۴٪ بود. 🔹تأمین مالی جمعی با بازدهی ۴۳٪، فاصله کمی با تورم داشت؛ اما صندوق‌های درآمد ثابت، صندوق‌های سهامی، بورس، سود بانکی و مسکن پایین‌تر از آن قرار گرفتند. 🔹البته بازدهی بالاتر همیشه به معنای انتخاب بهتر نیست. ریسک،

👌1

4 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC568 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightVideo

🔹چرا هنوز بسیاری از سرویس‌های مالی پایه که در دنیا به بخشی از زندگی روزمره تبدیل شده‌اند، در ایران وجود ندارند؟ 🔹در این ویدئو، نیما نامداری، تحلیل‌گر فین‌تک، از تجربه خود در این صنعت می‌گوید و توضیح می‌دهد که چگونه محدودیت‌های رگولاتوری و نبود زیرساخت‌های لازم، مسیر نوآوری و خلق ارزش برای مشتری را دشوار کرده است. 🔗 نسخه کامل پنل «چالشگران بانکی: بازآفرینی بازارهای مالی» را در کانال یوتیوب تکراسا تماشا کنید: https:/

3 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC568 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightPhoto

🔹حجم ۴ پلتفرم پیشرو ترکیه، حدود ۵ برابر مجموع معاملات بیش از ۳۰۰ پلتفرم ایرانی است. دلیل این اتفاق چیست؟ 🔹حجم معاملات سالانه چهار پلتفرم پیشرو ترکیه در سال ۲۰۲۴، حدود ۱۶۵ میلیارد دلار برآورد می‌شود؛ درحالی‌که مجموع معاملات بیش از ۳۰۰ پلتفرم ایرانی در سال ۱۴۰۳، بین ۲۷ تا ۳۷ میلیارد دلار است. 🔹این شکاف صرفاً یک تفاوت آماری نیست؛ بلکه نتیجه محدودیت‌هایی است که مستقیماً ظرفیت رشد بازار ایران را کاهش داده‌اند: تحریم، نب

1

2 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC623 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightPhoto

🔹چرا ۶۰٪ از حجم معاملات کاربران ایرانی در پلتفرم‌های تبادل رمزارز خارجی انجام می‌شود؟ 🔹داده‌‌های سال ۱۴۰۳ نشان می‌دهد حجم معاملات کاربران ایرانی در پلتفرم‌های خارجی حدود ۴۰.۵ تا ۵۵.۵ میلیارد دلار است؛ درحالی‌که این رقم برای پلتفرم‌های داخلی بین ۲۷ تا ۳۷ میلیارد دلار برآورد می‌شود. 🔹یکی از دلایل اصلی این اتفاق در دسترسی گسترده‌تر این پلتفرم‌ها به معاملات آتی، اهرم‌های معاملاتی و ابزارهای حرفه‌ای ترید است؛ امکاناتی ک

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC772 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightPhoto

🔹 تقریباً از هر ۶ ایرانی، یک نفر رمزارز دارد؛ اما این عدد در مقیاس جهانی چه معنایی دارد؟ 🔹 در سال ۱۴۰۳، تعداد دارندگان رمزارز در ایران حدود ۱۵ میلیون نفر برآورد شده است. نرخ مالکیت رمزارز در ایران نیز به ۱۶.۷ درصد رسیده؛ یعنی حدود ۲.۴ برابر میانگین جهانی. ایران در میان ۳۱ کشور بررسی‌شده، از نظر نرخ مالکیت رمزارز در رتبه هشتم قرار گرفته است. در این رتبه‌بندی، امارات با نرخ مالکیت ۲۵.۳ درصدی جایگاه نخست را دارد. 🔹 ای

👍21

30 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC776 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightVideo

🔹چرا در سال‌های اخیر، فین‌تک‌ها آن‌طور که انتظار می‌رفت نتوانستند محصولات فراگیر و تحول‌آفرین ارائه کنند؟ 🔹 امید ترابی، مدیرعامل دیجی‌پی، در این ویدئو توضیح می‌دهد که علاوه بر چالش‌هایی مانند رگولاتوری و ریسک‌های سیستماتیک، چه عامل دیگری باعث شده بسیاری از ایده‌های خوب به محصولات موفق تبدیل نشوند. 🔗 نسخه کامل پنل «چالشگران بانکی؛ بازآفرینی بازارهای مالی» را در کانال یوتیوب تکراسا تماشا کنید: https://youtu.be/1tx1xE

👌1🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC804 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightPhoto

🔹در بررسی ۱۲ صنعت فین‌تک ایران، هر صنعت پیشران‌ها و محدودیت‌های اختصاصی خود را داشت؛ اما مجموعه‌ای از عوامل مشترک نیز شناسایی شد که بر فین‌تک ایران اثر می‌گذارند. 🔹از یک‌سو، تغییر رفتار مصرف‌کننده، فراگیری دیجیتال و پیشرفت فناورانه، ناپایداری‌های کلان اقتصادی و پویایی و عملکرد بازارهای مالی جهانی، بازار را به جلو می‌رانند. 🔹از سوی دیگر، موانع ساختاری حاکمیت، چالش‌های زیرساخت فنی، بانکی و داده، رفتار غیرقابل پیش‌بین

1

26 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC713 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @techrasainsightVideo

🔹چه زمانی تنظیم‌گر از نقش اصلی خود فاصله می‌گیرد و به بخشی از بی‌نظمی سیستم تبدیل می‌شود؟ 🔹 شروین وکیلی، جامعه‌شناس تاریخی، در این ویدئو به این سوال پاسخ می‌دهند. 🔗ویدئو کامل این سخنرانی را می‌توانید در یوتیوب تکراسا ببینید: https://youtu.be/ytUwUGuafH4 @techrasainsight

👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TechRasaFarsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 299,847 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تهران پادکست | پادکست و کتاب صوتی
@tehranpodcast · 228,444
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TechRasa فارسی” (@TechRasaFarsi), 7,680 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TechRasaFarsi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.