Channel
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33,521subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001008178870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PHILOSOPHI_ZER |
| Created | 19 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PHILOSOPHI_ZER |
Recorded in 2019 as “نیچه و فلسفه” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 33,521 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 33,525 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 33,538 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 33,548 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 33,545 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 33,550 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 33,559 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:50 | 33,562 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 33,562 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,491 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 420 | 28.2% | |
| 👍 | 396 | 26.6% | |
| ❤ | 302 | 20.3% | |
| 🔥 | 201 | 13.5% | |
| 👎 | 72 | 4.83% | |
| 💯 | 37 | 2.48% | |
| 👌 | 25 | 1.68% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 1.48% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 0.402% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.268% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.134% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.134% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.067% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.067% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2025 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
به گمانِ من، یک دوستِ راستینِ زنان امروز رو به ایشان میگوید که: «زنان دربارهیِ زنان ساکت باشند!» 👤#نیچه 📚#فراسوی_نیک_و_بد، قطعه 232 فضیلت هایِ ما 🗞 @PHILOSOPHI_ZER I think that it is a true friend of the ladies who calls to them today: Woman should be silent about woman. #NIETZSCHE #BEYOND_GOOD_AND_EVIL , Our virtues 232
👍51🤣15❤11🔥5👎4
اگر آدمی برای «چرا؟»ی زندگانی خود پاسخی داشته باشد کموبیش با هر «چهگونه؟» ای میسازد _ انگلیسیست که در پی شادکامیست، نه آدمیزاد.* 👤#نیچه 📚#غروب_بت_ها، نکته پردازی ها و خدنگ اندازی ها، قطعه 12 🏛 @PHILOSOPHI_ZER *در این عبارت طعنهای به اصلِ اخلاقى فايدهباورى (utilitarianism) هست که دو فیلسوف سیاسی انگلیسی، جرمی بنتام و جان استوارت میل، در قرن نوزدهم پایهگذاری کردهاند. به گفته ایشان درستی کردار ها به میزان…
❤40👍10
اجرای جورجیوگابر (Giorgio Gaber) خواننده، آهنگساز، نمایشنامهنویس و بازیگر فقید ایتالیایی #حزب_باد_نباشیم 📚 @PHILOSOPHI_ZER
👍21❤15🤣9🔥2
یه لحظه رفتم به دورانی که توو دیوار دنبال ماشین کارکرده بودم
🤣56👎4🔥1
مظاهر حسینی، مسئول دیدارهای دفتر علی خامنهای، در تجمع شبانه حکومتی، گفت که مجتبی خامنهای در جریان بمباران بیت علی خامنهای، رهبر کشتهشده جمهوری اسلامی، از ناحیه زانو، کمر و پشت گوش آسیب دیده است. حسینی گفت: «زمانی که در دفتر بودم، در ۳۰ متری ما بمب خورد که شیرازی [رییس دفتر نظامی علی خامنهای] و دوستانشان پرپر شدند. ۷۰، ۸۰ متری ما جایگاه کار علی خامنهای را زدند که آن اتفاق افتاد.» او افزود: «منزل مجتبی خامنهای…
🤣60❤15👎1
البته این سخنان برای زمانی صادق بود که موشک ها به تهران نمیرسیدن. حالا که هیچ جا برای سران امن نیست کسی نگرانی خمودی قوای بشر رو نداره. 🏛 @PHILOSOPHI_ZER
🤣61❤14👎5
مسئله این نیست که بدانیم آیا کسی خشونت را میپذیرد یا رد میکند، بلکه مسئله این است که آیا خشونتی که فرد با آن همپیمان است، "مترقی" است و به سوی توقف خود میل پیدا میکند یا به سوی تداوم و بقای خویش. the question is not to know whether one accepts or rejects violence, but whether the violence with which one is allied is ”progressive” and tends toward its own suspension or toward self-perpetuation. 📚 Merleau-Ponty…
👍29❤8👎3🔥3😘1
میخواستین مقدمات ظهور رو مهیا کنید به امام های غایب یکی دیگه هم اضافه کردین.
🤣152👎8👍7🔥1
جرررررر خوردم
🤣66❤4👎3
الان این شنیدن داره
❤45👍8👎5🔥3
همیشه ترس از این داشتم که خامنه ای به مرگ طبیعی به درک واصل بشه. چی از این بهتر که لحظه مرگش فهمید به دست کسانی داره کشته میشه که بخاطر تنفر از آنها جوانی ما رو تباه کرد. لعنت بر خامنهای - لعنت بر خمینی
🔥163👍29👎20❤6
🏛 @PHILOSOPHI_ZER به من قول بده که پس از مرگم فقط دوستانم بر جنازه من حاضر شوند و مردم فضول و کنجکاو دیگر آنجا نباشند. مواظب باش که کشیش یا کس دیگر بر کنار گور من سخنان بیهوده و دروغ نگوید، زیرا در آن هنگام من توانایی دفاع از خویشتن را ندارم. بگذار تا مانند یک بت پرست خالص به گور روم. (وصیت #نیچه به خواهرش) 🏛 @PHILOSOPHI_ZER
👍171❤76🔥11🎉6🖕2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PHILOSOPHI_ZER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 328,077 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor” (@PHILOSOPHI_ZER), 33,521 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PHILOSOPHI_ZER.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.