National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 51 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,877–5,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 07:55
5,881
-1
17 Sept 2026, 11:55
5,882
+2
13 Sept 2026, 10:59
5,880
-5
31 Aug 2026, 17:43
5,885
-6
28 Aug 2026, 13:52
5,891
-1
25 Aug 2026, 17:23
5,892
-1
22 Aug 2026, 22:38
5,893
-1
19 Aug 2026, 02:23
5,894
-4
16 Aug 2026, 02:26
5,898
+3
12 Aug 2026, 05:06
5,895
+3
9 Aug 2026, 15:14
5,892
-3
6 Aug 2026, 14:47
5,895
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:01
5,895
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 26s
Average length
1m 49s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
160 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
61
38.1%
❤
46
28.7%
👏
20
12.5%
👎
12
7.50%
🤯
7
4.38%
🙏
5
3.13%
🤔
5
3.13%
👌
4
2.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📱 کاربران درباره آسیبهای فضای مجازی چه میگویند؟
📊 بررسی محتوای کاربران در سه بستر ایکس، #تلگرام و ایتا در چهار ماه ابتدایی سال 1405 نشان میدهد «اعتیاد و مصرف اجباری گوشی و فضای مجازی» مهمترین مضمون مشترک در هر سه بستر است؛ 🔄 مسئلهای که با چککردن مداوم گوشی، اسکرول بیهدف و دشواری فاصلهگرفتن از شبکههای اجتماعی خودش را نشان میدهد.
⚠️ اما آسیبها به همینجا محدود نمیشوند.
افت تمرکز و اتلاف وقت، اختلال خواب، …
#️⃣ هشتگهای داغ🔥 ایکس (توییتر)
🗓در ۲۴ ساعات اخیر (٢٠ مرداد)
🔺موضوعات داغ شده این روز:
🔹هشتگ #ایران_امام_رضا به مناسبت شهادت امام رضا (ع)
💬 در شناسایی و رتبهبندی هشتگهای داغ، عواملی مانند تعداد استفاده از هشتگ، تعداد و نرخ مشارکت کاربران و نسبت تولید به بازنشر محتوا تاثیر دارند.
@LifewebIR
#️⃣ هشتگهای داغ🔥 ایکس (توییتر)
🗓در ۲۴ ساعات اخیر (۱۹ مرداد)
🔺موضوعات داغ شده این روز:
🔹انتشار اخباری حول تایید حکم اعدام #رسول_رضایی از بازداشتیهای حوادث دی ۱۴۰۴
💬 در شناسایی و رتبهبندی هشتگهای داغ، عواملی مانند تعداد استفاده از هشتگ، تعداد و نرخ مشارکت کاربران و نسبت تولید به بازنشر محتوا تاثیر دارند.
@LifewebIR
#️⃣ هشتگهای داغ🔥 ایکس (توییتر)
🗓در ۲۴ ساعات اخیر (۱۸ مرداد)
🔺موضوعات داغ شده این روز:
🔹واکنشها به قتل #حمیدرضا_رجب_زاده، مداح جوان تهرانی
💬 در شناسایی و رتبهبندی هشتگهای داغ، عواملی مانند تعداد استفاده از هشتگ، تعداد و نرخ مشارکت کاربران و نسبت تولید به بازنشر محتوا تاثیر دارند.
@LifewebIR
#️⃣ هشتگهای داغ🔥 ایکس (توییتر)
🗓در ۲۴ ساعات اخیر (۱۷ مرداد)
🔺موضوعات داغ شده این روز:
🔹حواشی لایحه کنوانسیون حقوقی دریای خزر با هشتگهای #دریای_کاسپین_فروشی_نیست ، #RussiaGetOutOfIran ، #CaspianSeaIsNotForSale ، #Fuckrussia
💬 در شناسایی و رتبهبندی هشتگهای داغ، عواملی مانند تعداد استفاده از هشتگ، تعداد و نرخ مشارکت کاربران و نسبت تولید به بازنشر محتوا تاثیر دارند.
@LifewebIR
#️⃣ هشتگهای داغ🔥 ایکس (توییتر)
🗓در ۲۴ ساعات اخیر (۱۴ مرداد)
🔺موضوعات داغ شده این روز:
🔹سالروز تولد #مسعود_ذاتپرور از کشتههای حوادث ۱۸ دی
🔹برگزاری رویداد #جاماندگان_اربعین
💬 در شناسایی و رتبهبندی هشتگهای داغ، عواملی مانند تعداد استفاده از هشتگ، تعداد و نرخ مشارکت کاربران و نسبت تولید به بازنشر محتوا تاثیر دارند.
@LifewebIR
#️⃣ هشتگهای داغ🔥 ایکس (توییتر)
🗓در ۲۴ ساعات اخیر (۱۲ مرداد)
🔺موضوعات داغ شده این روز:
🔹هشتگ #عاشقان_حسین به دنبال برگزاری رویداد اربعین حسینی
💬 در شناسایی و رتبهبندی هشتگهای داغ، عواملی مانند تعداد استفاده از هشتگ، تعداد و نرخ مشارکت کاربران و نسبت تولید به بازنشر محتوا تاثیر دارند.
@LifewebIR
🍎کمپین جدید اپل: ریلکس، این آیفونه!
📱 اپل در کمپین «Relax, It’s iPhone» گوشی را کنار وان، در دست کودک و میان دندانهای سگ نشان میدهد؛ موقعیتهایی که مستقیماً به نگرانیهای روزمره کاربران مربوطاند. 💧خراش، آبخوردگی، افتادن و گمشدن گوشی از موضوعاتی هستند که بارها در انجمنها، کامنتها و ویدئوهای تجربهمحور صاحبان آیفون تکرار میشوند.
🛡 کمپین آیفون، بهجای توضیح درباره استانداردهای فنی، همین نگرانیها را به تصویر ت…
❤4👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @LifewebIR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آموزش سواد سایبری @Cyber_Literacy · 27,964 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
ایران تایمز @irantimes_com · 836,583 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
شبکه شاغلین مؤمن🇮🇷 @shaghelin · 65,620 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
NovinHub | نوین هاب @novinhub · 52,631 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى @tarjomaanweb · 45,683 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی | Ehsaneshooon @EhsaneshooonTG · 33,056 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊 @modiriran · 34,367 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
جواد موگویی|حرف بیحساب @javadmogoei · 35,536 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
پایگاه خبری تحلیلی اولین روایت @AvalinRevayat · 21,328 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026
فطرس @fotros_ir · 68,292 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
پشت پرده @poshteparde313 · 33,455 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
iranianstartup | ایرانیان استارتاپ @iranianstartup_com · 58,851 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
شبکه دانشگاه تهران UTV @Ut_internet_tv · 25,305 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
آزاد | Azad @azadsocial · 38,412 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
قاصم مدیا🚩 @QasemMedia · 30,459 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
توئیت کده @tweet_cade · 58,703 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 27 August 2026
اخبار جنگ / خبر یک خطی @khabar1khatti1400 · 261,001 Telegram ranks this channel #98 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لایفوب | Lifeweb” (@LifewebIR), 5,881 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LifewebIR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.