Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 97 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 23:49
5,151
-1
9 Nov 2026, 21:22
5,152
no change
9 Nov 2026, 20:47
5,152
+5,143
23 Oct 2026, 22:38
9
+2
17 Oct 2026, 12:20
7
+4
11 Oct 2026, 06:56
3
-5,291
26 Sept 2026, 23:56
5,294
+47
17 Sept 2026, 11:58
5,247
+1
13 Sept 2026, 17:57
5,246
+8
9 Sept 2026, 22:01
5,238
+29
4 Sept 2026, 20:38
5,209
+18
1 Sept 2026, 04:03
5,191
+7
29 Aug 2026, 13:13
5,184
-7
26 Aug 2026, 04:49
5,191
-1
23 Aug 2026, 06:14
5,192
+10
19 Aug 2026, 15:14
5,182
+9
16 Aug 2026, 20:07
5,173
+40
13 Aug 2026, 02:28
5,133
+16
10 Aug 2026, 04:11
5,117
+11
7 Aug 2026, 02:58
5,106
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.16%
avg views ÷ 5,151 subscribers
Avg views / post
266
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.647%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
65 (3 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
3,987
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 21:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18m 46s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
252 reactions across 41 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
98
38.9%
👍
71
28.2%
👏
21
8.33%
⚡
18
7.14%
🔥
12
4.76%
🤣
12
4.76%
👌
6
2.38%
🍓
5
1.98%
🤩
3
1.19%
🙏
2
0.794%
🥰
2
0.794%
👎
1
0.397%
😱
1
0.397%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
بایتدنس بیسر و صدا یه بمب جدید رو کرد و مدل تصویرساز Seedream 5.5 رو فرستاد توی زمین بازی؛ اونم نه به شکل یه پروژه آزمایشی و روی کاغذ، بلکه مستقیم وسط دل ابزارهایی که روزمره باهاشون سر و کار داریم، یعنی دریمینا، کپکات و پلتفرم ابری بایتپلاس.
قصه اصلی این نسخه اینه که بایتدنس دست گذاشته دقیقاً روی همون دردهایی که کاربرا و طراحها با میدجرنی و بقیه مدلها دارن؛ یعنی اون حس کلافهکنندهای که وقتی میخوای یه بخش کو…
بعد از دیدن این پست، این کامنت رو برای استاد عزیزم آقای دکتر مجاهدی نوشتم:
اونایی که مثل من با هوش مصنوعی دارن سر و کله میزنن خوب میدونن که همون یه ذره قطعیت در برخی موارد که حاصل سالها تجربه بود هم دیگه وجود نداره برامون. این هم لذت داره و هم نقمت اما در مجموع فکر میکنم از هر دوی این شرایط باید به گونه متفاوتی در بازاریابی استفاده کرد. از شرایط قطعی یه جور و از عدم قطعیت یه جور دیگه
به شخصه خوشحال میشم اگر برای این…
هر چه تجربه بیشتر، صبحت در مورد قطعیت یک موضوع کمتر.
افراد با تجربه بیشتر، به مراتب بیش از دیگران میدانند که چقدر عوامل متعددی در هر چیزی تاثیر گذارند (در یک سیستم تقریبا همه اجزا بر روی هم تاثیر میگذارند) و یک اتفاق حاصل برآیند عوامل و نیروهای متعددی است که حتی ممکن است بسیاری از آنها تاثیرشان غیر مستقیم و از چند لایه دورتر باشد.
شناخت این نیروها و تاثیر آنها بر موضوع، صرفا از طریق کسب دانش امکان پذیر نیست ولی مطال…
در جواب سوالی که ریپلای کردم باید بگم:
نه!!! هنوز هم مشکلاتی مثل مورفینگ شدید داره، یعنی چی؟ یعنی همین که دارید می بینید
جواب اینکه چرا خراب شده - Morph👇
تصویر مرجع ۱: مدل ۳ بعدی کامل متیو (پسر بچه)
تصویر مرجع ۲: عکس خانوادگی داخل آلبوم (والدین و نوزاد) هوش مصنوعی تلاش میکند هر دو مرجع تصویری را روی سوژهی اصلی شات اعمال کند. این امر باعث میشود که ظاهر دستها و صورت متیو با چهرهی نوزاد یا والدین ترکیب (Morph) شده …
در مورد گوگل فلو چندتا خبر دارم🔥🔥
یک دسته خبر بد، یک دسته خبر خوب
خبرای خوب😍:
- معرفی مدل جدید Omni 1.2 در 14 آبان - 5 نوامبر
- به گفته خودشون ثبات بیشتر برای کرکتر و صحنه و کات های پرشی کمتر هست
- تا 15ث میشه ویدئو ساخت در مدل جدید
خبرای بد😭:
- اینکه کردیتش دو برابر شده یعنی برای 10ث ویدئو در مدل 1.1 هزینه 15 کردیت بود اما در مدل 1.2 هزینه شده 30 کردیت و اگر بخواید 15ث بسازید هزینه میشه 60 کردیت یعنی 3 برابر
- در …
آنچه در گوگل فلو دارم میبینم. این مدلهایی که با قرمز نوشته کمتر از یک ماه دیگه حذف میشن
آیا بهتره که از همین الان دیگه ازشون استفاده نکنیم؟
بستگی داره، اگر پروژه کوتاه مدت دارید که تا اون موقع تموم میشه و با این مدلها جواب میده، استفاده کنید خوبه چون کردیت کمتری مصرف میشه اما اگر پروژه بلند مدته بهتره که از الان دیگه استفاده نکنید چون نتایج متفاوت میشن و گاهی مچ کردن صحنهها یا تکرارشون امکانپذیر نیست!
یه پیشنهاد…
🚀 آپدیت جدید Google Flow؛ معرفی Omni 1.2
گوگل نسخه جدید مدل ویدیوساز Flow رو با نام Omni 1.2 معرفی کرده که نسبت به نسخه 1.1 چند پیشرفت مهم داشته:
کیفیت و کنترل بهتر: حفظ دقیقتر چهره و هویت کاراکترها، پایبندی بیشتر به تصاویر مرجع و کنترل بهتر صحنه و حرکت دوربین.
ویدیوهای طولانیتر: امکان تولید و ویرایش ویدیو تا ۱۵ ثانیه، در حالی که قبلاً محدودیت ۱۰ ثانیه بود.
Extension:
حالا میتونید ویدیوی خودتون رو تا ۱۰ ثانیه دیگ…
الان دیگه با وجود هوش مصنوعی باید سریع محصول رو رسوند، بازاریابی گسترده انجام داد، بازخورد گرفت و محصول رو رشد داد
من میگم هر کسی که در فضای دیجیتال نفس میکشه باید بازاریابی دیجیتال بدونه، نه به معنای اینکه حتما دوره بگذرونه و مدرک بگیره و ...بلکه به معنای اینکه دو دو تا چهارتاش دستش باشه
بدون این نگاه، حرکتها دلی دلی کردنه نه هدفمند پیشرفت کردن!
۷۰ درصد کار تازه بعدش شروع میشه
من الان چند ماهیه با یکی از دوستان کامیونیتی داریم روی یه محصول مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی کار میکنیم و از لحاظ فنی دیگه محصول کامل آماده ورود به بازاره.
به علیرضا دیروز گفتم تازه الان کار اصلیمون شروع شده.
۳۰ درصدشو تا الان فقط انجام دادیم و تازه رسیدیم به اصلی ترین قسمت کار.
۷۰ درصد کار برمیگرده به مارکتینگ و پرزنت کردنش.
که خیلیا تو این بخش دوم تو کل کسب و کارشون میلنگن.
کارای بزرگی ا…
سلام 👋
تو این آموزش میخوام تجربهی خودم از استفاده از Claude برای ساخت موشنگرافیک رو باهاتون به اشتراک بذارم.
چند هفتهای میشه که تمام موشنهام رو با Claude انجام میدم و با توجه به هزینهای که کردم، واقعاً کلی در وقتم صرفهجویی شده.
به نظرم ابزار خیلی قوی و کاربردیایه. اگه پروژه دارید، با یه هزینهی خیلی کم میتونید کلی از وقتتون رو آزاد کنید.
قطعاً دوستانی هستن که تجربهشون خیلی بیشتر از منه. اگه جایی از ای…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @studioaimaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@studioaimaz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دانشگاه بازاریابی @iranmarketinguniversity · 110,886 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊 @modiriran · 34,253 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
پولسازی با هوشمصنوعی @polsazi_abbasi · 20,630 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
هنر فیلمنامه، کارگردان مولف @honarefilmnameh · 27,120 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
مجله | خلاقیت، بدون مرز @AR_NOSRATI · 48,877 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
کانال رسمی محمود معظمی @moazamica · 20,816 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
ایدههای جدید و خلاقانه محتوا - محمد مهدی میرزایی @contentideass · 30,184 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
NovinHub | نوین هاب @novinhub · 49,907 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
آوانگارد | هوشمندسازی مشاغل (AI) @arefehmasoudy · 23,143 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
🌏 پویش ملي صادرات @Exportcampaign · 22,326 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
قیمت دلار، طلا - الان چند @alanchandcom · 34,814 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
موزیک_تکست عاشقانه @masoud_musiic · 155,764 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
Mehrsasharoleslam @mehrsasharoleslam · 36,644 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
هوش مصنوعی در پژوهش @AI_in_Research · 305,648 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
هنر ایده خلاقیت @upcyclingidea · 26,288 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 September 2026
AvalAI | هوش مصنوعی @aval_ai · 24,607 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
مریم مجیدی نژاد|آموزش ادمینی @maryammajidinejadtel · 24,750 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
هوش مصنوعی [ AI ] @iFutureAI · 42,499 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
iranianstartup | ایرانیان استارتاپ @iranianstartup_com · 52,931 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
دایرکتم @directam_ir · 1,843 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
بیشتر از یک نفر | پیام بهرام پور @bishtarazyek · 50,432 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی | AI @AI_University · 31,914 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
هوش مصنوعی | Ehsaneshooon @EhsaneshooonTG · 32,159 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى @tarjomaanweb · 77,764 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Studio AImaz- استودیو آیماز” (@studioaimaz), 5,151 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/studioaimaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.