Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

EpitomeBooks

@epitomebooks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,152subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001321710324
TypeChannel
Username@epitomebooks
Descriptionجایی برای شنیدن درباره کتاب‌ها یوتیوب: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfC3vNa1hs8UeCnBLxBW3vQ آدرس سایت : http://epitomebooks.ir اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/epitome.podcast کست باکس: https://castbox.fm/va/3895776 آی دی من: @fifthace
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/epitomebooks

Growth

6,1416,1526,146.56 August 2026 — 6,141 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,141 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,144 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,152 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,139–6,154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:436,152+8
7 Aug 2026, 06:036,144+3
6 Aug 2026, 17:156,141no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:006,141first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 6,152 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 January 20263 August 2026)
Views total6,005
Reactions total163
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
280
Videos
81
Links
245

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 38s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

580 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44777.1%
👍11119.1%
👏132.24%
🤔61.03%
❤‍🔥20.345%
🆒10.172%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 580reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @epitomebooks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 January 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC860 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

. اگر از مخالفان سوسیالیسم بپرسید، احتمالاً یکی از اولین انتقادهایی که می‌شنوید این است: «سوسیالیست‌ها سرشت انسان را نمی‌شناسند. آن‌ها فکر می‌کنند انسان‌ها ذاتاً خوب‌اند.» اما آیا واقعاً سوسیالیسم بر چنین فرضی بنا شده است؟ مت مک‌منس در این مقاله استدلال می‌کند که اتفاقاً یکی از قوی‌ترین دلایل دفاع از سوسیالیسم، این است که انسان کامل نیست. اگر انسان می‌تواند خودخواه، قدرت‌طلب و مستعد فساد باشد، باید نهادهایی بسازیم

24👍6🤔3

1 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,080 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

اپیزود صد و نهم: دستکاری در رسانه‌ها قسمت آخر این ششمین و آخرین قسمت از ویژنامۀ دستکاری رسانه هاست. موضوعی جدید و به روز که احتمالا باید بگذارمشون همینجا تا خاک بخورن تا روزی نوبتشون بشه و شنیده بشن. همونطور که از فصل‌های دوم و سوم قول داده بودم هر فصل از پادکست یه ویژه‌نامه خواهد داشت و این ویژه‌نامه این فصل بود. اگه اپیزودهای قبل رو نشنیدید اول برید سراغ اونا. ما با آشنایی با گروه هایی که رسانه‌ها رو دستکاری میکنن

17

1 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC975 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اپیزود صد و نهم: دستکاری در رسانه‌ها قسمت آخر اعتماد به رسانه‌های جریان اصلی به پایین‌ترین سطح تاریخی رسیده. نظرسنجی گالوپ در سپتامبر ۲۰۱۶ نشان داد تنها ۳۲٪ آمریکایی‌ها به توان رسانه‌های جمعی برای ارائه «گزارش کامل، دقیق و منصفانه اخبار» اعتماد دارند — پایین‌ترین میزان در تاریخ این نظرسنجی. این اعتماد در طول قرن بیست‌ویکم پیوسته کاهش پیدا کرده، اما از سال ۲۰۱۵ تا ۲۰۱۶، هشت درصد افت داشته که نشان‌دهنده شدت بی‌اعتمادی

12

28 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,450 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

۱۰ دسامبر ۱۹۵۷، استکهلم. 🔹️ آلبر کامو، نویسندهٔ ۴۴ساله‌ای که هنوز خودش را «مردی تقریباً جوان با مجموعه‌ای ناتمام از آثار و پر از تردید» می‌دانست، روی صحنه رفت تا جایزه نوبل ادبیات را دریافت کند. 🔹️ وقتی آلبر کامو جایزه نوبل ادبیات را دریافت کرد، از وظیفه نویسنده سخن گفت: اینکه هنرمند نباید در خدمت دروغ و قدرت باشد، بلکه باید صدای کسانی باشد که صدایی ندارند. 🔹️ سخنرانی کامو مانیفستی است درباره شرافت، حقیقت و مسئولی

31👍6🆒1

21 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,640 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @khalajichFile

ما ایرانیان بیش از آنکه از کمبود تحلیل رنج ببریم، از فرسودگی امید رنج می‌بریم. سال‌هاست که هر روز با خبری تازه از بحران، سرکوب، جنگ، مهاجرت، فساد، تورم، تحریم یا ناامیدی بیدار می‌شویم. بسیاری از ما دیگر حتی خشمگین هم نمی‌شویم؛ فقط خبرها را می‌خوانیم، آهی می‌کشیم و از کنارشان عبور می‌کنیم. گویی به این باور رسیده‌ایم که تاریخ جایی بیرون از اراده ما نوشته می‌شود و سهم ما فقط تحمل کردن است. اما اگر بزرگ‌ترین پیروزی است

45👍18

16 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC≈2,000 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

این اولین قسمت از پروژه جدید اپیتومی بوکسه؛ من محمدرضا عشوری کتاب آزادیم تا جهان را تغییر دهیم نوشته لیندزی استون بریج رو ترجمه و صوتی کردم تا ببینیم آیا واقعا می‌تونیم جهان رو تغییر بدیم؟ حمایت از پادکست عضویت در باشگاه هواداران پادکست در یوتیوب https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfC3vNa1hs8UeCnBLxBW3vQ/join برای عزیزان داخل ایران صفحه حامی باش برای حمایت از پادکست https://hamibash.com/epitomebooks حساب پی پل: https

44👏5

16 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC≈1,680 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

کتاب صوتی آزادیم تا جهان را تغییر دهیم قسمت اول. فقط در اپیتومی بوکس @EpitomeBooks #هانا_آرنت #کتاب_صوتی #لیندزی_استون‌بریج #ترجمه #محمدرضا_عشوری

18

8 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC≈2,530 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

اپیزود صد و هفتم: بامداد خمار ❗️چرا «بامداد خمار» بعد از نزدیک به سه دهه هنوز هم خوانده می‌شود؟ چرا بعضی آن را روایتی تلخ از عشق می‌دانند و بعضی دیگر آن را کتابی محافظه‌کار که شور جوانی را سرزنش می‌کند؟ 🔹آیا محبوبیت این رمان فقط به خاطر داستانش است، یا تصویری از جامعه ایران در دهه هفتاد را هم با خود حمل می‌کند؟ در این اپیزود، فقط داستان کتاب را مرور نمی‌کنیم؛ درباره جایگاه «بامداد خمار» در ادبیات معاصر ایران، نقدها

12👍4

8 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,870 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اپیزود 107: بامداد خمار

9

30 Jun 2026, 17:04 UTC≈2,470 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

مارکوس اورلیوس نه سال در مرزهای امپراتوری روم جنگید؛ اما در «تأملات» خود تقریباً هیچ‌گاه درباره جنگ ننوشت. او از غرور، مرگ، محدودیت‌های انسان و خطر خودفریبی نوشت. در سوی دیگر، سیاستمداری ایستاده که جنگ را با نمایش، میکروفون و خودستایی می‌آمیزد. آیا میان رواقی‌گری یک امپراتور فیلسوف و خودشیفتگی سیاست مدرن، چیزی برای آموختن وجود دارد؟ در مقاله «از رواقی‌گری تا رخوت خودشیفتگی: جنگ‌های مارکوس اورلیوس و دونالد ترامپ»

27👍15

29 Jun 2026, 06:30 UTC≈2,170 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

اپیزود صد و شش: تازه‌های نشر در پاییز 1404 در این اپیزود بیش از 60 عنوان کتاب از 7 نشر ایرانی در حوزه‌های مختلف داستانی و غیرداستانی شامل روانشناسی، فلسفه، کودک، نوجوان، تاریخی و ... معرفی شده‌اند. حتما نظر خودتون رو راجع به این پروژه بهم بگید. قرار بود این اپیزود آخر دی ماه منتشر بشه که می‌دونید چرا نشد. 🖤 لینک خرید کتاب‌ها در سایت پادکست. با خرید از این لینک ها می‌تونید از ما حمایت کنید. از ما حمایت کنید عضویت

11👍5

29 Jun 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,850 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اپیزود ۱۰۶: تازه‌های نشر ایران در پاییز ۱۴۰۴

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @epitomebooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پادکست رخ
@rokhpodcast · 110,369
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EpitomeBooks” (@epitomebooks), 6,152 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epitomebooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.