Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کپی رایتینگ با محتوازیست

Channel

کپی رایتینگ با محتوازیست

@content_life

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,909subscribers

+216 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001733917878
TypeChannel
Username@content_life
Descriptionکپی‌رایتینگ (تبلیغ‌نویسی)، تبلیغات و بازاریابی محتوایی با پاسداشت زبان و ادبیات فارسی تعرفه تبلیغ/رپرتاژ👇 @mohtavazist_ads پشتیبان👇 @Poshtiban_content سفارش پروژهٔ کپی‌رایتینگ👇 hossein-vojdani.ir/contact لینکدین👇 linkedin.com/company/mohtavazist/
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/content_life

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6937,9097,8016 August 2026 — 7,693 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,697 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,716 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,725 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,726 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,740 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,742 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,748 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,762 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,796 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,804 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,814 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,826 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,835 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,848 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,861 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,864 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,866 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,854 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,863 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,870 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,884 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,895 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,896 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,909 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +216. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,661–7,941 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 03:507,909+13
6 Nov 2026, 09:197,896+1
3 Nov 2026, 08:577,895+11
31 Oct 2026, 09:377,884+14
26 Oct 2026, 01:477,870+7
22 Oct 2026, 19:477,863+9
19 Oct 2026, 23:367,854-12
17 Oct 2026, 08:167,866+2
14 Oct 2026, 12:107,864+3
10 Oct 2026, 20:427,861+13
4 Oct 2026, 23:397,848+13
25 Sept 2026, 16:207,835+9
16 Sept 2026, 17:167,826+12
12 Sept 2026, 19:157,814+10
9 Sept 2026, 00:177,804+8
3 Sept 2026, 13:567,796+21
31 Aug 2026, 00:487,775+13
28 Aug 2026, 00:027,762+14
24 Aug 2026, 21:547,748+6
21 Aug 2026, 10:287,742first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 7,909 subscribers
Avg views / post
985
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held105 (28 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total27,589
Reactions total301
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈946
Videos
≈219
Links
≈1,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 00m
Average length
10m 02s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

880 reactions across 86 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍34138.8%
❤23927.2%
👏9711.0%
🔥9110.3%
💔364.09%
🤔283.18%
😁222.50%
😍171.93%
😢70.795%
🙏20.227%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 904 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 10:05 UTC284 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @FalatuniPhoto

لیبراستار، ویراستاری آزاد و بی‌نیاز از اینترنت بخش جدیدی به سایت اضافه شد با عنوان لیبراستار (ترکیب لیبره به‌معنی آزاد + ویراستار) که قابلیت‌های ویرایش متنِ افزونهٔ پاک‌نویس را به‌اضافهٔ چند قابلیت ویرایشیِ جدید به‌صورت تحتِ‌وب اما در واقع بی‌نیاز از اینترنت در خودش دارد. برخلاف اغلب ویراستارهای آنلاین، این ویراستارِ آزاد هیچ داده‌ای را به سِرورهای خود نمی‌فرستد و همهٔ اصلاحات روی سیستم خودِ کاربر و کاملاً آفلاین ک…

❤3👏3👍2

10 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC417 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

آیا مدیران عامل، اینفلوئنسرن؟ ۶۱درصد از مردم وقتی مدیر عامل رو می‌شناسن، به برند بیشتر اعتماد می‌کنن! آژانس تبلیغاتی bbdo در همکاری با Forbes مقاله‌ای پژوهشی منتشر کرده که توش از این یافته پرده برداشته. توی این مقاله دربارهٔ #استراتژی_محتوا صحبت شده و داستان‌ها و محتواهایی که مدیر اون برند در شبکه‌های اجتماعی منتشر می‌کنه. همچنین تأکید کرده که این محتواها باید با اهداف اون برند یا کسب‌وکار همراستا باشه تا اعتماد ا…

👍4

9 Nov 2026, 17:18 UTC559 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

تعدادی از متقاضیان فرصت کارآموزی پیام دادن و داریم یکی‌یکی بررسی می‌کنیم و توضیحات تکمیلی رو می‌دیم خدمتشون. طبیعتاً پس از بررسی و مداقهٔ نهایی، در خدمت یک نفر از عزیزان خواهیم بود. دربارهٔ پرداختی شاید لازم باشه دوباره عرض کنم که برنامهٔ منسجم پرداختی نداریم مخصوصاً در اوایل همکاری، اما کیفیت این همکاری می‌تونه به دریافتی آتی کمک‌ کنه.

👍7

8 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC633 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @Matnook_com

⛔️ جملۀ خود را با «نسبت به ... اقدام کردن» سنگین نکنید! ✍️ عبارت «نسبت به ... اقدام کردن (/ نمودن)» آفتی رایج در نگارش رسمی است که جمله‌ها را بی‌جهت طولانی و دیریاب می‌کند. 🤔 چرا باید از این ساختار پرهیز کرد؟ 📉 ۱) نقض «اصل اقتصاد زبانی»: این اصل می‌گوید با کمترین واژه، بیشترین معنا را منتقل کنیم. عبارت «نسبت به ... اقدام کردن» متکلفانه و مصداق درازنویسی است. در نتیجه، فهم جمله را برای خواننده دشوار می‌کند. ⚙️ ۲) «اس…

👍11👏5

8 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC674 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

کپی‌رایتینگ هنر چگونه‌گفتن‌هاست... خیلی وقت‌ها این لحن و سبک بیانه که میزان اثربخشی‌ پیام رو تعیین می‌کنه. تپسی توی بخش ارسال غذاش، اینو به‌نظرم خوب گفته. پیام پشتش چی بوده؟ «چون داره بارون میاد، غذاتون دیرتر از روزای عادی می‌رسه.»🛵 ولی همینو با ادویه و سس آراسته و این‌طوری گفته: تو این هوا پیک‌ها بیشتر احتیاط می‌کنند... ممنون که صبورید. توی وبینار تحلیل گفتمان به همین ظرافت‌ها پرداختیم🤌 اگه دوست دارید یاد بگیر…

👍13❤3

7 Nov 2026, 20:07 UTC725 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @mohtavanegari_with_aghagol

ظاهراً دامنه‌های com دارن یکی یکی به دلیل تحریم‌ها بسته میشن. اول اینکه جالب شد. دوم بدبخت کسب‌وکار ایرانی. سوم اینکه اگر دامنه com دارید، مراقب باشید.

💔15👍3

6 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC884 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

📹 ویدئوی وبینار تحلیل گفتمان در طراحی پیام #وبینار رو پنج‌شنبه با تدریس مهسا رودحِلّه و همراهی شما برگزار کردیم. ویدئوی ضبط‌شده‌ٔ کاملش روی ایسمینار -برای کسانی که ثبت‌نام کرده بودن- در دسترس قرار گرفت🔥 ✅ برای سایر دوستان علاقه‌مند هم امکان تماشای ویدئو هست👇 https://eseminar.tv/wb185021 ‏ ——————————————————— ➕اما پیشتر هم یه وبینار تخصصی #نام‌گذاری داشتیم که ویدئوش رو اینجا می‌تونید ببینید. #زبان #آموزش #تبلیغات…

👏7❤6

5 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC≈2,740 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

در جستجوی معنی واژگان انگلیسی 🔍 حتی اگه مترجم یا نویسندهٔ مقاله هم نباشید ممکنه علاقه‌مند باشید که برگردان فارسی درستی برای واژه‌های انگلیسی در بافت‌ها و حوزه‌های معنایی مختلف پیدا کنید. یکی از وظایف فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی همینه و طی سال‌ها فعالیت، برای واژگان تخصصی بسیاری معنای فارسی پیشنهاد داده. یادمه یه‌بار اینجا دربارهٔ معادل engagement در حوزهٔ بازاریابی و علوم انسانی همفکری کرده بودیم؛ فرهنگستان، «پای‌ب…

👏5👍2

5 Nov 2026, 05:23 UTC≈2,280 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

تایپ صوتی امن و آسون این یه #ابزار رایگان، ساده و امن برای ویندوز، مک و لینوکسه. «هَندی» فایل‌های صوتی رو روی سیستم خودتون پردازش می‌کنه! مناسب وقتاییه که تایپ سخته یا کیبورد خرابه یا حالشو ندارید! کلاً اگه سرعت تایپ پایینی دارید هم می‌تونه کمکتون کنه. ✍حتی می‌تونه برای کسانی که نوشتن براشون سخته، با گفتن، نوشتن رو آسون‌ کنه! همچنین میشه فارسی حرف زد و متن ترجمه‌شدهٔ انگلیسی تحویل گرفت. دانلود و نصب👇 🔗 https://h…

😍3👍2❤1

5 Nov 2026, 05:04 UTCviews —

کپی رایتینگ با محتوازیست pinned «یادآوری🛎 امروز عصر، موقع برگزاری این وبینار نابمونه! بعد از یادگیری مهارتایی که توی این کارگاه تدریس می‌کنیم: اولاً گوش و چشمتون حساس میشه به پیامایی که باهاش روبرو می‌شین. دیگه نمی‌تونین از کنار هر پیامی ساده رد شین! هی دوس دارین تحلیلش کنین و کشف کنین…»

4 Nov 2026, 06:53 UTC674 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @mahmoodbashash

تقریباً همه از هوش مصنوعی استفاده می‌کنند. پس چرا همه نتیجه بهتری نمی‌گیرند؟ پژوهش سال ۲۰۲۶ شرکت Orbit Media از ۱۰۴۲ فعال بازاریابی محتوا، نکته جالبی دارد. ۹۲.۴٪ پاسخ‌دهندگان از هوش مصنوعی برای وبلاگ‌نویسی استفاده می‌کنند. اما پژوهشگران ارتباط مشخصی بین صرف استفاده از AI و گزارش نتایج قوی‌تر پیدا نکردند. یعنی استفاده از هوش مصنوعی به‌تنهایی مزیت رقابتی محسوب نمی‌شود. این تحقیق همچنین نشان می‌دهد کسانی که فرایند …

❤5👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @content_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@content_life edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @content_life as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTCAnonymous Poll314 voters

برای تولید محتوای متنی فارسی، بیشتر از کدوم استفاده می‌کنید؟

  1. chatGPT62%
  2. Gemini23%
  3. Claude11%
  4. DeepSeek7%
  5. Gapgpt4%
  6. Perplexity2%
  7. Grok4%
  8. سایر چت‌بات‌ها4%
  9. اصلاً از هوشواره کمک نمی‌گیرم13%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ایده‌های جدید و خلاقانه محتوا - محمد مهدی میرزایی
@contentideass · 30,184
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
آموزش کسب درآمد دلاری از هوش مصنوعی
@webmastermentor · 21,367
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
مدرسه نویسندگی|شاهین کلانتری
@shahinkalantari · 20,349
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
مریم مجیدی نژاد|آموزش ادمینی
@maryammajidinejadtel · 24,750
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
دانشگاه بازاریابی
@iranmarketinguniversity · 110,886
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Mehrsasharoleslam
@mehrsasharoleslam · 36,644
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
دایرکتم
@directam_ir · 1,843
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
NovinHub | نوین هاب
@novinhub · 49,907
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
روابط عاطفی با فرشته آزادنیا
@fereshteazadnia · 22,751
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 18 September 2026
Mindq
@mindqinfo · 27,384
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى
@tarjomaanweb · 77,764
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
مجله | خلاقیت، بدون مرز
@AR_NOSRATI · 48,877
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی | Ehsaneshooon
@EhsaneshooonTG · 32,159
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊
@modiriran · 34,253
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
آگهی🥇استخدام🎗کاریابی دندانپزشکی پزشکی
@estekhdami_com · 22,692
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 18 September 2026
💢 تفکرات پیمان
@tafakkoratpeyman · 26,114
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
بیشتر‌ از‌ یک‌ نفر | پیام بهرام پور
@bishtarazyek · 50,432
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
پانته‌آ وزیری
@pv44telegram · 22,782
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
طاها بام‌شاد | مربی فن‌بیان و ارتباطات
@rahkar_com · 23,818
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 September 2026
🌏 پویش ملي صادرات
@Exportcampaign · 22,326
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
کافه کتاب
@CafeKetab · 57,605
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
علی ميرصادقی
@ali_mirsadeghi · 45,567
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
مدیر وب - آموزش سئو و هوش مصنوعی
@modireweb · 49,237
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
انجمن مدیران
@managersclub · 149,507
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کپی رایتینگ با محتوازیست” (@content_life), 7,909 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/content_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.