Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ایستارتاپس | حسین مرادی

@eastartups

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,031subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001021570076
TypeChannel
Username@eastartups
Description📚داستان موفقیت و الگوی فکری کارآفرینان و بزرگان در ©ایستارتاپس (استارتاپهای شرق) eastartups= East Startups زیرنظر دکتر حسین مرادی؛ موسس استارت‌آپ یواسپیس (پلتفرم خدمات بوم گردی) www.Uspace.ir تبلیغات @eastartup
Created6 January 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eastartups

Growth

18,03118,05918,0455 August 2026 — 18,059 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,057 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,053 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,048 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,046 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,041 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,037 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,031 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,027–18,063 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:1818,031-6
12 Aug 2026, 18:0418,037-4
11 Aug 2026, 20:2218,041-5
10 Aug 2026, 21:3118,046-2
9 Aug 2026, 21:1618,048-5
8 Aug 2026, 21:0818,053-4
6 Aug 2026, 18:2818,057-2
5 Aug 2026, 18:4018,059first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 18,031 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held24 (15 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total49,358
Reactions total449
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,230
Videos
1,610
Links
2,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 50s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

480 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23348.5%
👍22246.3%
👎132.71%
🤔112.29%
🐳10.208%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 480reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC748 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🎞 فرمول MPH راز پیشرفت خیره کننده کشور سنگاپور از زبان یکی از مدیران آن 📚 ایستارتاپس 👇 🆔 @eastartups 🎯

👍102

Signed Hossein Moradi

9 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈1,530 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

💥 روش های بهبود رتبه اعتباری برای گرفتن وام، اعتبار خرید یا حتی حذف ضامن، فقط میزان دارایی مهم نیست؛ چیزی که بانک‌ها و لندتک‌ها نگاه می‌کنن، سابقه خوش‌حسابی شماست. رتبه اعتباری معمولاً بین ۲۵۰ تا ۹۰۰ امتیاز داره و از A1 تا E3 دسته‌بندی می‌شه؛ هرچقدر به A1 نزدیک‌تر باشی، شانس بیشتری برای گرفتن تسهیلات با شرایط بهتر داری. برای بهتر شدن رتبه اعتباری: - اقساط وام و خریدهای اعتباری رو سر موعد پرداخت کن. - چک برگشتی

👍54

Signed Hossein Moradi

8 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,670 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

💥 چرا باید احساسات خود را نام‌گذاری کنیم و به زبان بیاوریم؟ وقتی احساسات خود را نام‌گذاری می‌کنید و آن‌ها را به زبان می‌آورید؛ مثلاً می‌گویید: «الان عصبانی‌ام»، «ناامیدم»، «مضطربم»، «وحشت‌زده‌ام»، «از این موضوع احساس انزجار دارم» یا «غمگینم»، فعالیت آمیگدال (مرکز هشدار مغز) کاهش می‌یابد و مغز راحت‌تر می‌تواند هیجان را تنظیم کند. احساساتی که سرکوب می‌شوند، معمولاً از بین نمی‌روند؛ بلکه استرس و فشار روانی را افزایش

👍83🐳1

Signed Hossein Moradi

8 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,220 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

💥‏«اگه می‌خوای دنیا رو بفهمی، بخون. اگه می‌خوای خودت رو بفهمی، بنویس.» 📚 ایستارتاپس 👇 🆔 @eastartups 🎯

👍81🤔1

Signed Hossein Moradi

6 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,690 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026

💥 هوش مصنوعی بهتر می‌نویسد؛ انسان باید بهتر ویرایش کند اکونومیست در گزارشی تازه می‌نویسد مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی با سرعتی بالا در تولید متن پیشرفت کرده‌اند و ممکن است در چند سال آینده به سطح نویسندگان حرفه‌ای نزدیک شوند؛ اما همین پیشرفت، مهارت انسانی تازه‌ای را مهم‌تر می‌کند: ویرایش دقیق، انتقادی و هدفمند. مسئله اصلی دیگر فقط این نیست که هوش مصنوعی می‌تواند متن بنویسد یا نه. چالش تازه این است که بسیاری از متن‌های تولی

7👍3👎1

Signed Hossein Moradi

6 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,820 views21 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

💥 اعتیادآورترین بخش شبکه‌های اجتماعی، خودِ محتوا نیست؛ بلکه «ندانستنِ پست بعدی» است. بیشتر ما تصور می‌کنیم دلیل اعتیاد به شبکه‌های اجتماعی، ترشح زیاد دوپامین است. اما علوم اعصاب داستان دیگری را روایت می‌کند: مشکل اصلی غیرقابل‌پیش‌بینی بودن پاداش است. هر بار که صفحه را اسکرول می‌کنید، مغز نمی‌داند قرار است چه چیزی ببیند: یک پیام مهم؟ یک لایک جدید؟ یک ویدیوی جذاب؟ یا شاید؟ همین «شاید» باعث فعال شدن سیستم پاداش م

👍137🤔1

Signed Hossein Moradi

5 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,870 views17 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

💥حقوق سالیانه ۴۰۰ هزار دلاری برای فیلسوف‌ها در صنعت هوش مصنوعی! شرکت‌هایی مانند OpenAI، Anthropic و DeepMind از فیلسوفان برای توسعه و ارزیابی مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی استفاده می‌کنند. بر اساس گزارش اکونومیست، ۵ درصد از مشاغل جدید AI به نقش‌های مرتبط با فلسفه اختصاص دارد و متخصصان حوزه اخلاق و حکمرانی هوش مصنوعی می‌توانند تا ۴۰۰ هزار دلار در سال درآمد داشته باشند. اما فیلسوف‌ها دقیقاً چه می‌کنند؟ آن‌ها با تحلیل منطقی، ب

👍116

Signed Hossein Moradi

3 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈2,490 views33 reactionsread 14 August 2026

💥 مغزهای فسیل زنگ‌زده "سازمان برنامه، و وسواسی عبث بر اندازه‌گیریِ قطاری که حرکت نمی‌کند" .✍ علی میثمی (دکترای سیاستگذاری نوآوری) ▫️فسیل زنگ نمی‌زند؛ زیرا برای زنگ‌زدن باید هنوز آهنی باقی مانده باشد؛ برای فسیل‌شدن نیز، حیات باید مدت‌ها پیش پایان یافته باشد. بااین‌حال، برخی نهادها به‌طرزی عجیب هر دو کار را هم‌زمان انجام می‌دهند: اندیشه در آنها می‌میرد و ابزارهایشان، از فرط کهنگی، صدا می‌دهند. ▫️بیراه نیست اگر سریال

👍229👎2

Signed Hossein Moradi

2 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈2,040 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

🎧 خلاصه کتاب «غریزه مهم‌بودن» اپیزود ۱۱۷ بی‌پلاس منتشر شده در ۲۴ تیرماه ۱۴۰۵ The Mattering Instinct : How Our Deepest Longing Drives Us and Divides Us اثر Rebecca Newberger Goldstein 📚 ایستارتاپس 👇 🆔 @eastartups 🎯

9👎3👍1

Signed Hossein Moradi

31 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC≈2,670 views38 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🎞 چرا با وجود این همه رنج و سختی که کشیده‌ای، همچنان خوشحالی و این همه نشاط از کجا آمده؟ پاسخ قابل‌تامل نوال السعداوی نویسنده و کنشگر مطرح جهانی را ببینید👌 💡خلاقیت، می‌تواند هر رنجی را از بین ببرد. رمز فراموش شده شادی، خلاقیت و آفرینش است. با آفرینش و نوشتن یک مقاله یا کتاب، خلق یک اثر هنری بدیع، ساخت یک کسب و کار یا خلق یک محصول یا خدمت مفید، علاوه بر نقش‌آفرینی بهتر در جامعه، شادی را نیز به خود هدیه می‌دهید.👌

30👍8

Signed Hossein Moradi

29 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,810 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

💥 هشدار هراری درباره آینده هوش مصنوعی یووال نوح هراری، تاریخ‌دان و نویسنده مشهور، در سخنرانی جدید خود در دانشگاه آکسفورد گفت هوش مصنوعی در حال «هک کردن کد تمدن انسانی» است؛ زیرا زبان، پایه شکل‌گیری مفاهیمی مانند قانون، پول، دولت و مذهب است. 🧠 او معتقد است برای هزاران سال، تنها انسان‌ها توانایی درک و تفسیر زبان را داشتند، اما اکنون هوش مصنوعی به‌سرعت در حال رسیدن به سطحی است که می‌تواند زبان را حتی بهتر از انسان‌ها

👍7🤔3

Signed Hossein Moradi

28 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTCviews —

ایستارتاپس | حسین مرادی pinned «💥 نیمکت ساعت ۳ صبح من صندوقدار یک فروشگاه مواد غذایی هستم. شیفت شب کار می‌کنم از ساعت ۱۰ شب تا ۶ صبح. وقتی شب‌ها کار می‌کنی، آدم‌های ثابتی را می‌بینی؛ بی‌خواب‌ها، کارگرهای شیفت شب، آدم‌هایی که شاید نمی‌خواهند به خانه‌های خالی‌شان برگردند. هفته گذشته،…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @eastartups. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 151,624 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ایستارتاپس | حسین مرادی” (@eastartups), 18,031 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eastartups.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.