💡 متاسفانه یا خوشبختانه... 😑 💡 @NooshDaroo_web
👍10

Channel
@kar_kasb
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,583subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001008755410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kar_kasb |
| Description | اول کار، بعداً کسب! یادداشتهای روزانهی کاملاً شخصی "عادل طالبی" درباره کسبوکار آنلاین، کتابهایی که دوست دارم، مطالب و مقالات کار و کسبی و **غیره**! درخواست مشاوره: https://kar-kasb.com/c ارتباط با من: https://atalebi.com/contact |
| Created | 4 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kar_kasb |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Recorded in 2019 as “کار و کسب” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 06:41 | 18,583 | +2 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 05:59 | 18,581 | +1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:50 | 18,580 | +8 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:25 | 18,572 | +10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:15 | 18,562 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:20 | 18,568 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:50 | 18,572 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:21 | 18,575 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:16 | 18,577 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 18,575 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 18,581 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 18,585 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 18,588 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 18,592 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 18,595 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 18,592 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:31 | 18,596 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 18,598 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 18,607 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 18,614 | first reading |
79 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 79 (7 January 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,754 |
| Reactions total | 129 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 16:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,495 reactions across 76 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,731 | 69.4% | |
| 🥰 | 570 | 22.8% | |
| 🤔 | 130 | 5.21% | |
| 😱 | 64 | 2.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💡 متاسفانه یا خوشبختانه... 😑 💡 @NooshDaroo_web
👍10
📌 آش شلهقلمکار با لوبیا و نخود له شده این کانال نوشدارو که پست بالا از آن فوروارد شده است را بروید و ببینید: 👉 t.me/kar_kasb/17822 متوجه میشوید از این شوخیها خیلی کم دارد! آنجا، نکات خیلی خوب و حرفهای و با زبان نسبتا قابل فهم برای بخش قابل توجه جامعه، برای حفظ امنیت در فضای دیجیتال منتشر شده است و خطرات موجود را گوشزد میکنند و راهکار میدهند. دیروز هم دیدم (مثل چند بار قبل) که درباره امنیت فرزندان در فض…
👍9🥰2
📌 خربزه و گردو! یه شعر طنز همدانی هست که میگه: درخت گردکان به این بزرگی درخت خربزه؟ الله اکبر!!! طرف درخت گردو رو میبینه و میگه گردو به این ریزی این درختشه، درخت خربزه ببین چقدر بزرگه! دیگه این روزها با آرگون فیبل ۵.۱، در کارهای روتین دیجیتال مارکتینگ به ندرت کاری پیش میآد که نتونن بهتر از آدمیزاد انجامش بدن. حالا این ۵.۲ میخواد چی بشه؟ این همه سرعت برای چی؟ به کجا چنین شتابان؟ حالا بذارید فیبل ۵.۱ رو خوب ت…
👍15🥰2
وبینار گفتگومحور: کاربرد AI در مارکتینگ ابزارهای AI هر روز بیشتر میشوند، اما فاصلهی «استفاده کردن» تا «نتیجه گرفتن» هنوز زیاد است. در این وبینار از تجربهی کسانی میشنویم که این فاصله را در عمل طی کردهاند: 🔸 رضا شیرازی مفرد، موسس وب ۲۴، سئو ۲۴، جتسئو و آژانس سئو ۲۴ در کانادا 🔸 عادل طالبی، متخصص مارکتینگ B2B با تمرکز بر ABM و AI در بازارهای جهانی 🗓 یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان ۱۴۰۵ ⏰ ساعت ۱۹ 👈 ثبتنام: https://eseminar.tv/wb…
👍4
📌 حدود یک ساعت دیگر.... همراه با رضا شیرازی گپ و گفتی خواهیم داشت. 🔘 کار و کسب. عادل طالبی ☑️ @kar_kasb
👍9🤔2
راهنمای هوش مصنوعی کلاد برای مبتدیان @kar_kasb
👍21🥰4😱1
📌 کلاد، هلو برو تو گلو یا کلاد برای مبتدیان! کلاد در حال حاضر بهترین ابزار است. البته گران است (نسبت به چتجیپیتی) ولی هر دو مدل فیبل ۵.۱ و اوپوس ۵.۵ در کنار هم واقعا معجزه میکنند. البته اگر بلد باشید. امروز دنبال چیزی بودم دیدم در کلاد یک آموزش به اسم ۱۰۱ هست. به یاد قدیمها که از این کتابهای سری ۱۰۱ زیاد بود و میخواندیم. ساده و قابل فهم برای همه و مبتدی بودند. دادم خود کلاد گفتم فارسیش کن. کرد. یه فایل زی…
🥰16👍7
📌 تبلیغات در ژپتو (چتجیپیتی)؟ مروری بر وضعیت بازدهی تبلیغات در چتجیپیتی و چند پنل ادز مثل مایکروسافت و لینکدین. چند وقتی هست که تبلیغات در OpenAI و چتجیپیتی را شروع کردهام و باید بگویم قیمت بالا و عدم کارایی و نداشتن ابزارهایی برای ریتارگتینگ و ریمارکتینگ مهمترین مشکلات آن در حال حاضر است. به نظر من فعلا زود است که آن را جدی بگیریم. شاید فعلا برای تبلیغدهندگان خوشبودجه مناسب باشد. کسانی که بودجههای چ…
👍21🥰6
📌 اگر مایکروسافت پرسن هستید... نه. ربطی به مایکروسافتپرسن(!) بودن ندارد. اگر در مایکروسافت و شبکه MSN میخواهید تبلیغات داشته باشید وبینارهای مایکروسافت را از دست ندهید. از جمله همین وبینار: Prepare for the age of AI shopping: Driving growth with agentic commerce این هم لینک: ثبتنام در وبینار مایکروسافت اگر هم نتوانستید شرکت کنید یا آنلاین قطع و وصل میشد یا مثل من زبان انگلیسیتان خوب نیست و باید دور کند ببیند، …
👍12
📌 خدا بگم چه کارتون نکنه! امروز یکی از عزیزان که در دوره آنلاین بازاریابی دیجیتال که طی این یک سال سه بار به خاطر شرایط و جنگ و شرایط نامناسب سلامتی متوقف شده و به تعویق افتاده این را فرستاد. هر نیم ساعت یک نگاهی میکنم بهش. چیز خاصی نیست. یک پرامپت ساده و خروجی هوش مصنوعی است. بله. ولی اصل ماجرا برای من آن حسی است که آن پرامپت را نوشته. ممنونم. حالم خیلی خوب شد امروز. 🔘 کار و کسب دیجیتال، عادل طالبی ☑️ @kar_ka
🥰29👍15🤔1
این هم ویدیوی این وبینار: مشاهده وبینار
👍7
📌 قلاب یا چسبندگی؟ هوک یا استیکنس؟ این کردیتهایی که چتجیپیتی دارد پخش میکند عملا هر دو کار را انجام میدهد. از یک طرف آن کلاد و آنتروپیک لعنتی با آن مصرف وحشیانهٔ کردیت را آچمز میکند و از طرفی، کانکتورهایی که در ژپتو (جیپیتی سابق!) میتوان اضافه کرد هم خیلی جالب هستند. هم قلاب میاندازد هم میچسباند. اگر کتابهای قلابشده (هوکد) و کتابهای حوزه بازاریابی محتوایی مثل مسری و ایده عالی مستدام (ایدههایی که می…
👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @kar_kasb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@kar_kasb edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 62 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کار و کسب، عادل طالبی 📌” (@kar_kasb), 18,583 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kar_kasb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.