Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 50 days, net -446. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,550–22,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 21:18
21,617
-49
18 Sept 2026, 16:40
21,666
-9
16 Sept 2026, 11:38
21,675
-10
14 Sept 2026, 18:00
21,685
-33
13 Sept 2026, 06:58
21,718
-36
11 Sept 2026, 09:01
21,754
-24
8 Sept 2026, 16:21
21,778
-38
5 Sept 2026, 09:57
21,816
-35
3 Sept 2026, 10:42
21,851
-36
2 Sept 2026, 04:55
21,887
-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:48
21,893
-20
31 Aug 2026, 03:47
21,913
-28
30 Aug 2026, 06:57
21,941
-5
28 Aug 2026, 04:57
21,946
-26
27 Aug 2026, 02:19
21,972
-3
26 Aug 2026, 01:42
21,975
-9
25 Aug 2026, 04:52
21,984
-8
23 Aug 2026, 23:06
21,992
-2
22 Aug 2026, 08:15
21,994
-11
20 Aug 2026, 21:57
22,005
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 11 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 21,617 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.299%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
48 (11 March 2025 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
73,953
Reactions total
52
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈779
Videos
≈361
Links
≈2,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
52 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
35
67.3%
👍
12
23.1%
👎
3
5.77%
👌
2
3.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2025 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 48 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sedanet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 March 2025 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
شایستهسالاری چگونه نابرابری را تقویت میکند؟
✍️ #مایکل_سندل
ترجمه و توضیح: #منوچهر_ذاکر
ما معمولاً «شایستهسالاری» را نقطهٔ مقابل پارتیبازی، تبعیض و امتیازهای موروثی میدانیم: اگر زمین بازی برابر باشد و هرکس به اندازهٔ استعداد و تلاشش پیش برود، چه چیزی عادلانهتر از این؟
مایکل سَندل، استاد فلسفهٔ سیاسی دانشگاه هاروارد، درست همین تصورِ بهظاهر بدیهی را به چالش میکشد.
استعدادمان را خودمان انتخاب نکردهایم؛ حتی ای…
🔆 چرا موفقیت، موفقیت میآورد؟ اثر متیو
✍️ اد یونگ
آیا موفقیت فقط نتیجهٔ استعداد، تلاش و مهارت است؟ یا گاهی یک امتیاز کوچک، یک فرصت تصادفی یا یک تأیید اولیه میتواند مسیر زندگی و حرفهای افراد را تغییر دهد؟
#رابرت_مرتن ، جامعهشناس، این پدیده را «اثر متیو» (Matthew Effect) نامید: کسانی که از ابتدا اندکی جلوترند، اغلب فرصتهای بیشتری به دست میآورند و همین مزیت اولیه میتواند در طول زمان بزرگتر شود.
پژوهشهای تجربی…
🔆 چرا از موسیقی غمگین لذت میبریم؟
شاید یکی از عجیبترین تجربههای انسانی همین باشد: ما در زندگی واقعی از غم و رنج فرار میکنیم، اما گاهی خودمان انتخاب میکنیم به موسیقیای گوش دهیم که میدانیم قرار است ما را اندوهگین کند؛ قطعهای که شاید اشک به چشممان بیاورد، اما باز هم آن را دوباره پخش میکنیم.
چرا چیزی که در زندگی واقعی دردناک است، در قالب هنر میتواند زیبا و حتی لذتبخش شود؟ چرا تراژدیهای یونان باستان، رمانها…
🔆 بحران همچون شیوهای از زندگی
✍️ #کاستیکا_براداتان و #کمیل_اونگوریانو
جنگها، خطر درگیریهای گسترده، بحران اقلیمی، فرسایش دموکراسیها، افزایش نابرابری و هراس از پیامدهای فناوریهای نوین، تصویری از جهانی ساختهاند که گویی دیگر با یک بحران مشخص روبهرو نیست، بلکه درون شبکهای از بحرانهای همزمان گرفتار شده است.
بحران دیگر فقط یک حادثه گذرا نیست؛ به زبان زمانه ما تبدیل شده است. از آخرالزمانگرایی در فرهنگ عمومی تا ا…
🔆 چرا هنوز به پیشگویان گوش میدهیم؟
روانشناسی باور به روایتهای بزرگ دربارهی آینده
چرا وقتی کسی از «پایان یک دوره تاریخی»، «سقوط تمدنها» یا «ظهور قدرتهای پنهان» سخن میگوید، ناخودآگاه جذب میشویم؟
جملاتی مثل «جهان وارد دورهای سرنوشتساز خواهد شد» یا «نظم قدیم در حال فروپاشی است» بسیار هیجانانگیزند؛ اما اگر دقیقتر نگاه کنیم، اغلب نمیگویند دقیقاً چه اتفاقی، چه زمانی و با چه معیاری قرار است رخ دهد.
#فیلیپ_تتلا…
🔆 نشست معرفی و بررسی کتاب شرقگرایی و شرقزدگی
در نود و دومین نشست «گفتار و اندیشه» در شیراز، کتاب «شرقگرایی و شرقزدگی» نوشته #کرامتالله_راسخ معرفی و بررسی شد. راسخ در این نشست کوشید چارچوب نظری کتاب را با تکیه بر تمایز میان دو ساختار اجتماعی «جماعت» و «جامعه» توضیح دهد و نشان دهد که شرقگرایی در ایران چگونه از یک گرایش تاریخی به برساختی ایدئولوژیک و سیاسی تبدیل شده است. #رحیم_محمدی ، مدیر گروه جامعهشناسی ایران …
🔆 اثر فورر: علمِ گولزدنِ یک نفر با جملههایی که مالِ همه است
در سال ۱۹۴۸، برترام فورر، روانشناس بالینی در یک کلینیک بهداشت روانی وابسته به وزارت جانبازان آمریکا در لسآنجلس، آزمایشی در کلاس درس روانشناسی مقدماتیاش اجرا کرد که بعدها یکی از ماندگارترین یافتههای تاریخ روانشناسی شخصیت شد. نتیجهی این آزمایش امروز با عنوان «اثر فورر» (Forer Effect) یا «اثر بارنوم» (Barnum Effect) شناخته میشود؛ پدیدهای که توضیح می…
🔆 چرا انجام دادن کارها اینقدر دشوار شده است؟
پسماند توجه و هزینه پنهان جابهجایی میان کارها
چرا با وجود ساعتها کار، گاهی احساس میکنیم هیچ پیشرفتی نکردهایم؟
شاید مسئله فقط کمبود تمرکز یا ضعف اراده نباشد. گاهی بخشی از ذهن ما هنوز درگیر کاری است که از آن عبور کردهایم؛ پیامی که نیمهکاره مانده، تصمیمی که گرفته نشده، یا پروژهای که هنوز در ذهن ادامه دارد.
روانشناس سازمانی سوفی لروی برای توضیح این تجربه، مفهوم «پسم…
🔆 سلسلهگفتارهای «قرآن و کثرتانگاری دینی»
#فرهاد_شفتی
آیا قرآن در مواجهه با تعدد ادیان، نگاهی انحصارگرایانه دارد یا میتوان در آن از نوعی کثرتانگاری دینی سخن گفت؟
آیا راههای گوناگونی برای ارتباط انسان با خداوند و رستگاری وجود دارد؟ مرز میان کثرتپذیری و نسبیانگاری کجاست؟
فرهاد شفتی در این سلسلهگفتار، با تمرکز بر مبانی قرآنی، دیدگاههای رقیب و پیامدهای نظری و عملی بحث، به بررسی این پرسشها میپردازد.
او معتقد …
🔆 مقاله «اخلاق جنگ»
✍️ #برتراند_راسل
مترجم: آرین رسولی
وقتی از جنگ سخن میگوییم، معمولاً پرسشها خیلی زود به سمت پیروزی و شکست، قدرت نظامی و منافع سیاسی میروند. اما یک پرسش بنیادیتر وجود دارد: آیا ممکن است کشتن و ویرانکردن، در شرایطی خاص، از نظر اخلاقی قابل دفاع باشد؟
برتراند راسل، فیلسوف برجستهی قرن بیستم، در مقالهی «اخلاق جنگ» (۱۹۱۵) به همین پرسش میپردازد. او نه جنگ را در همهی شرایط محکوم میکند و نه هر اد…
🔆 دین در عصر سکولار
✍️ #حسین_هوشمند
چرا جهان مدرن، جهانی شد که در آن ایمان دیگر یک امر بدیهی نیست، بلکه به یکی از امکانهای متعدد زندگی انسانی تبدیل شده است؟
چارلز تیلر در کتاب سترگ عصر سکولار نشان میدهد که سکولاریسم صرفاً به معنای کاهش دینداری یا جدایی دین از نهادهای عمومی نیست؛ بلکه دگرگونی عمیقتری در «شرایط امکان باور» رخ داده است. انسان مدرن در جهانی زندگی میکند که در آن ایمان و بیایمانی هر دو باید خود را در…
🔆 اندیشیدن علیه خویش؛ تأملاتی دربارهی چوران
✍️ سوزان سانتاگ
چه میشود اگر اندیشیدن، بهجای آنکه راهی برای رسیدن به آرامش و یقین باشد، خود به نیرویی علیه یقینهای ما بدل شود؟
در این جستار خواندنی، #سوزان_سانتاگ به سراغ #امیل_چوران میرود؛ متفکری که اندیشه را نه ساختن یک نظام فلسفی، بلکه نوعی مواجههی بیامان ذهن با خودش میفهمد. سانتاگ، چوران را در امتداد سنتی قرار میدهد که از کییرکگور و نیچه تا ویتگنشتاین کشیده م…
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @Sedanet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مصطفی ملکیان @mostafamalekian · 65,703 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
علوم اجتماعی،مسائل روز @social_science · 23,976 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
جامعهشناسی @iransociology · 37,496 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
اپلای فنلاند 🇫🇮 مهاجرت مازیار @Apply_Finland · 60,302 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وبسایت فرهنگی صدانت” (@Sedanet), 21,617 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sedanet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.