https://youtu.be/yuTpDWDo86E?si=OvyM1pLFehH2Ucu4 @ahmadzeidabad
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi

Channel
@ahmadzeidabad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
74,821subscribers
-143 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001368575513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ahmadzeidabad |
| Description | احمد زیدآبادی |
| Created | 8 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ahmadzeidabad |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:55 | 74,821 | -42 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 74,863 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 74,878 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 74,896 | +23 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 74,873 | -31 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 74,904 | -17 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 74,921 | -15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 74,936 | +12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:13 | 74,924 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 74,933 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 74,942 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 74,949 | -28 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 74,977 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 74,971 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 74,969 | -31 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 75,000 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 75,006 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 75,008 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 75,012 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 75,030 | first reading |
131 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 131 (31 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,089,460 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 12:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
https://youtu.be/yuTpDWDo86E?si=OvyM1pLFehH2Ucu4 @ahmadzeidabad
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
نقطهٔ منطقی قاعدتاً مسعود پزشکیان متن نطق خود را برای صحبت در صحن مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل آماده کرده و دیگر بعید است به هر دلیلی آن را تغییر دهد. اگر اما من جای او بودم، تلاش میکردم در نقطهٔ "منطقی" قرار گیرم تا جای هیچ توجیهی برای اعمال فشار به کشور باقی نماند. مسئلهٔ همیشگی رویاروی جمهوری اسلامی این بوده است که آیا آن ابتدا به ساکن تهدیدی علیه برخی از کشورهاست، یا برخی از کشورها تهدیدی علیه آن هستند؟ اگر رئیسجمهور…
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
آفت سترگ! در نیویورک دیدار و مذاکره به قصد پایان جنگ؛ در خیابانها و تریبونهای عمومی بیحیثیتسازی و خیانتانگاری از دیدار و مذاکره و پایان دادن به جنگ! چنین پدیدهای در تاريخ ملت-دولتها سابقه دارد؟ من که نمونهای نمیشناسم! این دوگانگی بیسابقه در دستگاهی که بنا به ماهیت خود باید یگانه باشد، علامت چیست؟ علامت این است که پس از گذشت قریبِ نیمقرن از تاریخ انقلاب، هنوز ضرورتها و الزامات ملت-دولت برای بسیاری از با…
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
نه از اونت، نه از اینت! روزنامهٔ کیهان این روزها عربستان و آلسعود را با تندترین عبارات ممکن مورد حمله قرار میدهد. انگار یادش رفته است که همین چهار سال پیش، پس از توافق دولت مرحوم سید ابراهیم رئیسی با عربستان برای عادیسازی روابط، همین روزنامه پایش را در یک کفش کرده بود که "عربستان به محور مقاومت پیوسته است!" به قول ماهطلعت، نه از اونت، نه از اینت! بیچاره آن محافلی که با اتکاء به تحلیلهای این روزنامه برای کشور …
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
چه دستی پشت ماجراست؟ رئیسجمهور عازم نیویورک شده و پشت سرش، توهين و تحقیر و تهدید عدهای علیه او، به اوج خود رسیده است! کامنتهای این جماعت از جنس نقد نیست و کوچکترین علامتی از دلسوزی نسبت به کشور و حتی نظام مستقر در آن دیده نمیشود! فقط به عنوان نمونه، ابوالقاسم طالبی کارگردان فیلم "قلادههای طلا" خطاب به یوسف پزشکیان نوشته است: " آقازادهٔ پزشکیان به ملت ایران خطاب کرده مثل یمنیها بیامکانات باشید تا بابا جلوی دشم…
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
دیدار در نیویورک؟ دونالد ترامپ از احتمال دیدارش با مسعود پزشکیان همتای ایرانی خود در حاشیهٔ اجلاس مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل خبر داده است. تاکنون طرف ایرانی واکنش مستقیمی به این خبر نشان نداده و فقط آقای پزشکیان به صورت کلی به لزوم "پذیرش درخواست صلح از سوی دشمن" اشارهای کرده است. آیا واقعاً قرار است دیداری بین رؤسای جمهور ایران و آمریکا در نیویورک صورت گیرد؟ چنین اتفاقی خیلی دور از ذهن به نظر میرسد اما سیاست در بزنگاه…
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
مرجع خیرخواه و محتاط در بارهٔ مشی سیاسی و فقهی و خلق و خوی شخصی آیتالله سید موسی شبیری زنجانی از زبان غلامحسین کرباسچی نکات ارزندهای شنیدهام. آقای کرباسچی در اواخر دههٔ ۴۰ و اوایل دههٔ ۵۰ از شاگردان برجستهٔ مرحوم آقای شبیری بوده است. طبق شنیدهها، آیتالله شبیری هم در فقه و هم در سیاست، اهل احتیاط بوده است، یعنی همان اصلی که علمای سنتی شیعه آن را نشانهٔ تقوا میدانستند. احتیاط یعنی بررسی همهجانبهٔ یک امر، پیش ا…
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
ولایتی گفت و یوسف پزشکیان فحشش را خورد! جنجال بیپایهای که رسانههای افراطی علیه یوسف پزشکیان فرزند رئیسجمهور به راه انداختهاند، بلانسبت شبیه یک ضربالمثل ناگفتنی است! یوسف پزشکیان طی اظهارنظری، برخی نیروهای تندرو خواهان تداوم جنگ را مورد چالش قرار داده و از آنها پرسیده است که اگر جنگ را میپسندند دیگر چرا علیه پیامدهای ناگوار اقتصادی آن شعار میدهند؟ جنگ در هر حال، انواع فشارهای اقتصادی را به دنبال دارد، از همین…
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
🔸 *ترک تخاصم یا جنگ ناگزیر؟* ▪️ مناظره احمد زیدآبادی و علی صمدزاده درباره سرنوشت جنگ ایران و آمریکا راه حل منازعه ما و آمریکا چیست؟ عدهای معتقدند تنها راه رهایی ما از تعلیق میان جنگ و صلح، توقف جنگ با هر روشی و سپس عادی شدن رابطه ایران و آمریکا به منظور ورود کشور به مسیر توسعه است. عدهای هم تنها راه نجات را استقبال از این جنگِ ناگزیر، خوب جنگیدن و پیروزی در این جنگ میدانند؛ بهنحوی که تضمینی واقعی برای توقف جن…
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
یمن در آستانهٔ جنگی بیسابقه به نظر میرسد آمریکا و عموم متحدانش خود را برای حملهای سخت و گسترده علیه حوثیهای يمن آماده میکنند. احتمال ورود نیروهای زمینی برخی کشورهای منطقه به خاک یمن به قصد تصرف پایگاههای حوثیها هم دور از انتظار نیست. نتیجه چه خواهد شد؟ بهتر است صبر کنیم و شاهد باشیم. #احمد_زیدآبادی @ahmadzeidabad
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
https://youtu.be/WzckvLurDRQ?si=oQPkHS3k_o_yX-4F @ahmadzeidabad
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
پارادایم جدید! عباس عراقچی: "جهان به یک پارادایم جدید نیاز دارد که در آن توسعه، بخشی از امنیت تلقی شود." پارادایم جدید برای جهان خوب است؛ اما اگر شهروندی، اشارهای به این لفظ برای تحول در نظم داخلی کشور کند، چه بر سرش میآید؟ #احمد_زیدآبادی @ahmadzeidabad
Signed Ahmad Zeidabadi
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @ahmadzeidabad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ahmadzeidabad edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 68 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 58 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Ahmad Zeidabadi |
|---|---|
| Description | Iranian journalist |
| X / Twitter | @Zeidabadi_Ahmad |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نگاه متفاوت (احمد زیدآبادی)” (@ahmadzeidabad), 74,821 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahmadzeidabad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.