برای مدیران عامل و صاحبان کسبوکار
تصمیمهای بهتر در بازاریابی، تبلیغات، برند، فروش و AI
علیجاه شهربانویی | مشاور ارشد بازاریابی و برندینگ
https://alijah.work/
Created
24 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,606–6,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 08:20
6,622
-1
6 Nov 2026, 05:41
6,623
+1
2 Nov 2026, 19:10
6,622
-3
30 Oct 2026, 09:54
6,625
-9
27 Oct 2026, 17:01
6,634
+1
24 Oct 2026, 08:06
6,633
-4
21 Oct 2026, 07:21
6,637
-7
18 Oct 2026, 06:08
6,644
-8
14 Oct 2026, 23:30
6,652
-1
11 Oct 2026, 10:40
6,653
-2
4 Oct 2026, 20:56
6,655
+2
25 Sept 2026, 14:17
6,653
-26
17 Sept 2026, 07:39
6,679
-13
12 Sept 2026, 22:39
6,692
-22
9 Sept 2026, 01:59
6,714
-11
3 Sept 2026, 20:40
6,725
+6
28 Aug 2026, 13:23
6,719
+12
25 Aug 2026, 05:25
6,707
+6
22 Aug 2026, 13:33
6,701
+13
19 Aug 2026, 01:44
6,688
first reading
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.44%
avg views ÷ 6,622 subscribers
Avg views / post
360
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.967%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
74 (20 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
9,721
Reactions total
94
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,700
Videos
≈3,350
Links
≈4,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 57s
Average length
1m 29s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
420 reactions across 66 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
134
31.9%
❤
117
27.9%
👏
33
7.86%
👎
23
5.48%
👌
20
4.76%
💔
18
4.29%
🔥
12
2.86%
🍌
11
2.62%
😁
11
2.62%
🤣
10
2.38%
🗿
7
1.67%
🤮
6
1.43%
🤬
5
1.19%
😱
3
0.714%
🤡
3
0.714%
💯
2
0.476%
😢
2
0.476%
🌚
1
0.238%
🤩
1
0.238%
🤷♂
1
0.238%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 454 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⏺گاهی مشتری، مدل کسبوکار آینده شما را زودتر از خودتان کشف میکند!
فرض کنید مشتریان یک نرمافزار، حساب کاربریشان را با دیگران شریک میشوند. یا کارکنان یک شرکت، به جای استفاده از نرمافزار رسمی سازمان، با هزینه شخصی ابزار دیگری میخرند. یا مشتری برای استفاده از محصول شما، چند ابزار دیگر را به هم متصل میکند.
واکنش معمول شرکتها چیست؟ محدودکردن دسترسی، اصلاح مقررات یا تلاش برای جلوگیری از این رفتارها.
اما من فکر می…
🔴بلک فرایدی و یک نکته بسیار مهم در مورد نقش محصولات
بیشتر شرکتها برای بلک فرایدی از اینجا شروع میکنند که روی کدام محصولات چقدر تخفیف بگذارند. من فکر میکنم پرسش مهمتری وجود دارد: تخفیف یک محصول، چه اتفاقی برای فروش بقیه محصولات میاندازد؟
فرض کنید یک برند سه مدل محصول اقتصادی، میانرده و گرانقیمت دارد. با تخفیف سنگین مدل میانرده، فروش آن ناگهان بالا میرود. گزارش کمپین هم موفقیت را نشان میدهد. اما اگر بخش بزر…
🍟 آیا مکدونالدز میخواهد از هر مشتری به اندازه توان پرداختش پول بگیرد؟
ماجرای تازه مکدونالدز در آمریکا، بحث جالبی درباره مرزهای قیمتگذاری هوشمند ایجاد کرده است. پنج قانونگذار آمریکایی در نامهای به مدیرعامل این شرکت خواستهاند توضیح دهد الگوریتمهای قیمتگذاری مکدونالدز چگونه کار میکنند و از چه دادههایی استفاده میکنند.
بر اساس تحقیقات رویترز، مکدونالدز از الگوریتمهای یادگیری ماشین برای پیشنهاد قیمت بهینه …
🔺گاهی یک بازار بزرگ از یک دردسر کوچک شروع میشود
شرکتی به نام Revere Robotics در آمریکا مشغول ساخت رباتی است که کارش فقط این است: سطل زباله خانه را در روز جمعآوری تا کنار خیابان ببرد و بعد برگرداند! اسمش را هم Curbie گذاشتهاند.
هنوز محصول تجاری آمادهای نیست، اما ایدهاش برای من جالب است. نه فناوری خارقالعادهای را وعده میدهد و نه مسئله بزرگی از بشریت حل میکند. فقط میخواهد یکی از کارهای تکراری و ناخوشایند زند…
🔻همه Canva را میشناسند؛ پس چرا دوباره سراغش نمیروند؟
کنوا در کمپین جدید خود با شعار «What Will You Canva Today?» و همکاری آژانس Goodby Silverstein & Partners، به سراغ مسئلهای رفته که بسیاری از برندهای شناختهشده با آن مواجهاند.
تحقیقات کنوا نشان داده کاربران آمریکایی این پلتفرم را میشناسند، اما اغلب فقط برای یک کاربرد مشخص سراغ آن میروند و لزوما بازنمیگردند؛ درحالیکه کنوا امروز امکانات متنوعی از طراحی ویدئو…
🔴مشتری فقط محصول را مصرف نمیکند، شیوه مصرف را هم تجربه میکند
باز کردن یک بسته، آماده کردن یک نوشیدنی، مکث پیش از اولین جرعه یا حتی ترتیب خوردن چند تکه شکلات، میتواند بخشی از لذت مصرف باشد. این رفتارها همیشه برای کارکرد محصول ضروری نیستند، اما توجه و مشارکت فرد را بیشتر میکنند.
در روانشناسی مصرف، به چنین توالی تکرارشونده و نمادینی «آیین مصرف» میگویند. نکته جالب این است که حتی حرکات ساده و تا حدی غیرضروری هم می…
⏺بزرگترین خطای برندینگی که من دیدهام چیست؟
یکی از بزرگترین ضعفهایی که در شرکتهای ایرانی میبینم، نداشتن منطق درست در معماری برند است. بعضی شرکتها برای هر محصول و فرصت تازهای یک برند جدید میسازند و بعضی دیگر آنقدر در ایجاد برند جدید محافظهکارند که همه محصولات و کسبوکارهای متفاوت را زیر یک نام جمع میکنند.
نتیجه هر دو رویکرد، شکلگیری سبدی از برندهاست که تعدادی ارزشمند و دارای ظرفیت رشدند و تعدادی دیگر عمل…
🔺شرکتهای چندکسبوکاره به یک مرکز نیاز دارند، نه فقط چند هدف
در یک جلسه هیئت مدیره، مدیر یک کسبوکار از تقاضای باثبات و حاشیه سود قابل پیشبینی دفاع میکند. مدیر کسبوکار دیگر از فرصتی حرف میزند که هنوز بازارش شکل نگرفته، اما میتواند آینده شرکت را عوض کند. هر دو ممکن است استدلال اقتصادی معتبری داشته باشند. پس تصمیم را با چه منطقی باید گرفت؟
در شرکتهای متنوع، مشکل همیشه کمبود فرصت یا حتی کمبود سرمایه نیست. گاهی س…
⏺رقیب را معیار رشد خودتان نکنید
مقایسه با رقبا برای تشخیص فاصله مفید است، اما برای تعیین مقصد میتواند خطرناک باشد. دیدن اینکه یک برند در آگاهی، ترجیح یا تعامل امتیاز بالاتری دارد، به ما نمیگوید چه چیزی آن امتیاز را ساخته است.
ممکن است پشت نتیجه، توزیع گستردهتر، سابقه طولانیتر، بودجه متفاوت یا حتی ویژگیهای خاص بازار باشد. کپی کردن شاخص موفقیت، بدون شناخت سازوکار ایجاد آن، یعنی تقلید از نتیجه بدون داشتن علت.
در…
🚘گاهی مزیت از قویتر شدن نمیآید، از عوض کردن معیار رقابت میآید
در مسابقه ۲۴ ساعته لمان ۱۹۵۳، جگوار با خودروی C-Type مجهز به ترمز دیسکی مقامهای اول، دوم و چهارم را به دست آورد. در دورانی که قدرت موتور یکی از معیارهای اصلی برتری بود، جگوار روی مسئله دیگری دست گذاشته بود: ترمزهایی که در سرعت بالا کارایی خود را از دست ندهند.
این مثال برای استراتژی تبلیغات بسیار مهم است. بسیاری از بریفها زمین بازی را از قبل تعریف می…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @alijahsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alijahsh edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @alijahsh as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مجله | خلاقیت، بدون مرز @AR_NOSRATI · 48,877 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
کانال رسمی محمود معظمی @moazamica · 20,816 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊 @modiriran · 34,253 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
دانشگاه بازاریابی @iranmarketinguniversity · 110,886 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
هنر فیلمنامه، کارگردان مولف @honarefilmnameh · 27,120 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
🌏 پویش ملي صادرات @Exportcampaign · 22,326 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
پیج خلاقیت™ @page_khalaghiat · 42,475 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
بیشتر از یک نفر | پیام بهرام پور @bishtarazyek · 50,432 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
پادکست دغدغه ایران - کانال رسمی @dirancast_official · 20,572 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
iranianstartup | ایرانیان استارتاپ @iranianstartup_com · 52,931 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
انجمن مدیران @managersclub · 149,507 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Mindq @mindqinfo · 27,384 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
ایدههای جدید و خلاقانه محتوا - محمد مهدی میرزایی @contentideass · 30,184 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
دایرکتم @directam_ir · 1,892 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
دکتر شیری @drshiri · 97,091 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
💢 تفکرات پیمان @tafakkoratpeyman · 26,114 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
پادکست پلی لیست|Playlist @Playlistpodcas · 156,453 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى @tarjomaanweb · 77,764 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
NovinHub | نوین هاب @novinhub · 49,907 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
بازاریابی، مذاکره تجاری و فروش @lect_negotio · 24,172 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
مدیر وب - آموزش سئو و هوش مصنوعی @modireweb · 49,237 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
مدرسه نویسندگی|شاهین کلانتری @shahinkalantari · 20,349 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
کانال صادق الحسینی @Sadegh_Alhosseini · 56,194 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
گروه مالی مفید @mofidsecuritiesofficial · 78,748 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RADIO | علیجاه شهربانویی” (@alijahsh), 6,622 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alijahsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.