Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “نشر نو” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net +200. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,703–6,963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 18:21
6,933
+11
7 Nov 2026, 05:50
6,922
+3
4 Nov 2026, 08:10
6,919
+6
1 Nov 2026, 15:47
6,913
+7
29 Oct 2026, 09:46
6,906
+4
26 Oct 2026, 10:04
6,902
-5
23 Oct 2026, 01:10
6,907
+5
19 Oct 2026, 19:20
6,902
+3
16 Oct 2026, 21:30
6,899
+5
13 Oct 2026, 22:16
6,894
+8
8 Oct 2026, 08:20
6,886
+1
1 Oct 2026, 18:00
6,885
+23
16 Sept 2026, 13:19
6,862
+8
12 Sept 2026, 07:38
6,854
+12
8 Sept 2026, 12:57
6,842
+15
3 Sept 2026, 00:36
6,827
+12
31 Aug 2026, 02:54
6,815
+17
28 Aug 2026, 00:03
6,798
+7
25 Aug 2026, 04:52
6,791
+6
22 Aug 2026, 03:55
6,785
first reading
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.8%
avg views ÷ 6,933 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.968%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
72 (23 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
41,132
Reactions total
398
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 15:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,610
Videos
≈467
Links
≈4,240
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
962 reactions across 69 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
681
70.8%
👍
116
12.1%
🔥
86
8.94%
🙏
79
8.21%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 986 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (58.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ماکیاوللی را اغلب با یک کتاب، چند جملۀ مشهور و تصویری تقریباً یکسره از قدرت و فریب میشناسیم. اما چهرۀ او بسیار پیچیدهتر از این کلیشههاست.
در این مجموعه، سه کتاب را کنار هم گذاشتهایم که هرکدام از زاویهای متفاوت به ماکیاوللی نزدیک میشوند:
ماکیاوللی برای همه
برای بازخوانی ماکیاوللی و فهم اینکه چرا اندیشۀ او هنوز، چند قرن بعد، برای روزگار ما زنده و مسئلهساز است.
ماندراگولا
ماکیاوللی اینبار نه در مقام نظریهپرد…
مهرگیاه (ماندراگولا) منتشر شد.
نیکولو ماکیاولی، نویسنده و متفکر بزرگ عصر رنسانس، بیشتر با آثار سیاسی و تاریخیاش شناخته میشود که مشهورترینشان کتاب فوقالعاده تأثیرگذار شهریار است. اما از ماکیاولی چند اثر ادبی نیز باقی مانده که در میانشان مهرگیاه (ماندراگولا) جایگاه ویژهای دارد، نمایشنامهای که از دید برخی مفسران با وجود مضمون غیرسیاسیاش آیینهدار رسالات سیاسی اوست.
مهرگیاه (ماندراگولا) از یک سو از آثار پلوتوس…
بهزودی...
تصویرِ علمی که نخستین بار در ۱۹۸۰ منتشر شد از آثارِ بسیار مهمِ فلسفهی علم در نیمهی دومِ قرنِ بیستم است. باس ونفراسن در این کتاب نظریهای بدیل در برابرِ واقعانگاریِ علمی ارائه میکند که خود آن را تجربهگراییِ ساختی مینامد.
ونفراسن میکوشد این پرسشِ مهم را به مرکزِ توجهِ فلسفهی علم بازگرداند: آیا هدفِ علم کشفِ حقیقت دربارهی جهان است، یا علم صرفاً به دنبالِ دستیابی به نظریههایی است که با پدیدارهای…
برای فهم جهان امروز، فقط دنبال کردن خبرها کافی نیست. باید سراغ ایدههایی رفت که پشتِ قدرت، نابرابری، آزادی، فناوری و نظم اقتصادی ایستادهاند. این ۶ کتاب، هرکدام از زاویهای متفاوت به همین پرسشها نزدیک میشوند:
سرمایه و ایدئولوژی
عصر سرمایهداری نظارتی
انسانیت
در برابر جهان مدرن
درباره آزادی
اقتصاد خیر و شر
شش کتاب برای فهم بهتر سازوکارهایی که هر روز بر زندگی ما اثر میگذارند.
@nashrenow
داستان کوتاه، هنرِ فشردن جهانیست در چند صفحه؛ آنجا که یک لحظه، صدا یا واقعۀ کوچک، میتواند به روایتی ماندگار بدل شود.
مجموعۀ داستانهای کوتاه نشرنو، گزیدهایست از جهان نویسندگانی که ایجاز را به عمق رساندهاند؛ از روایتهای تلخ و طنزآمیز تا فضاهای گوتیک، کلاسیک و تأملبرانگیز.
@nashrenow
۱۶ کتاب تاریخی نشرنو، از ایران باستان و مشروطه تا انقلاب فرانسه، قسطنطنیه و پاریس ۱۹۱۹؛ برای آنهایی که دوست دارند گذشته را کمی عمیقتر بخوانند.
ایران به روایت کرزن
کتاب نارنجی
دینهای ایران باستان
آشنایی با تاریخ ایران
پرشین پترولیوم
اروپا در آینه
ترور در انقلاب فرانسه
شاه جهان
تئاتر و رقص در ایران
انقلاب فرانسه
قسطنطنیه
پاریس ۱۹۱۹
جنبشهای اجتماعی در ایران پس از اسلام
اختراع قوم یهود
سازمانهای امنیتی روس
تاریخ ای…
از بارنز تا سال بلو؛ هجده کتاب برای اضافهکردن به کتابخانه.
بعضی کتابها فقط خوانده میشوند و تمام. بعضی دیگر، آرامآرام جایی در حافظه باز میکنند و مدتها پس از بستهشدن آخرین صفحه، همچنان با ما میمانند.
این فهرست، انتخابی است از جهانهای متفاوت ادبیات معاصر؛ از حافظه و فقدان تا عشق، تنهایی، مرگ، ایمان و مواجههی فرد با جهانی که همیشه آنقدرها هم قابل فهم نیست.
جولین بارنز، جی. ام. کوتزی، سال بلو، روبرت والزر، ار…
ما معمولاً بدن را یک «کل» میبینیم. اما حقیقت این است که زندگی ما از میلیاردها واحد زنده ساخته شده؛ واحدهایی که رشد میکنند، تقسیم میشوند، اشتباه میکنند، ترمیم میکنند و گاهی علیه خودِ بدن عمل میکنند. سرود سلولها داستان همین جهان پنهان است.
سیدارتا موکرجی در این کتاب، از نخستین کشف سلولها تا سرطان، سیستم ایمنی، سلولهای بنیادی و آیندۀ پزشکی پیش میرود و نشان میدهد که چطور فهمیدن همین واحدهای کوچک، نگاه ما به ان…
نامهها گاهی چیزهایی را میگویند که در هیچ کتاب دیگری پیدا نمیکنیم.
در مجموعۀ «مکاتبات» نشرنو، میشود به زندگی، روابط، دغدغهها و جهان فکری نویسندگان و متفکران نزدیکتر شد؛ از نامههای شخصی و عاشقانه تا مکاتبات ادبی، اجتماعی و فکری.
اگر دوست دارید نویسندگان را بیرون از متن آثارشان هم بشناسید، این دسته جای خوبی برای شروع است.
@nashrenow
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @nashrenow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کتابخانه @bookhapdf · 75,502 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
کافه کتاب @CafeKetab · 57,610 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى @tarjomaanweb · 77,239 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
گفت و چای | فهیم عطار @fahimattar · 43,221 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
کتابهای کمیاب و نایاب @freeforbiddenbooks · 47,404 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری @DrAzarakhshMokri · 203,238 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor @PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,118 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
English online @Eng_Online · 36,394 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
شفیعی کدکنی @shafiei_kadkani · 44,363 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نشرنو” (@nashrenow), 6,933 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nashrenow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.