Channel
@jafekri
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,175subscribers
+815 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001069390349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jafekri |
| Description | «جایی برای فکر کردن» انتقادات و پیشنهادات: @Jafekribot پشتیبانی: @GhafBusiness Instagram: jafekri/ www.jafekri.com |
| Created | 27 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jafekri |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:55 | 41,175 | +18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 41,157 | +34 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 41,123 | +57 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 41,066 | +32 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 41,034 | +67 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 40,967 | +92 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 40,875 | +96 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 40,779 | +13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 40,766 | +24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:06 | 40,742 | +37 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 40,705 | +24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 40,681 | +14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 40,667 | +27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 40,640 | +21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 40,619 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 40,621 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 40,611 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 40,598 | +24 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 40,574 | +25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 40,549 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (17 December 2025 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 64,070 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 12:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
وقتی وارد یک رابطه میشیم، فقط یک نفر رو انتخاب نمیکنیم؛ ناخواسته وارد شبکهای از خانواده، دوستان، همکاران، آدمهای گذشته و تمام افرادی میشیم که بخشی از زندگی اون آدم هستند. مسئله این نیست که این آدمها حذف بشن یا نه، مسئله اینه که تا کجا اجازه دارن وارد قلمرو «ما» بشن. کدوم حرفها فقط متعلق به رابطهاند؟ نظر خانواده کجا باید شنیده بشه و کجا نباید تبدیل به تصمیم بشه؟ دوستی با جنس مخالف یا پارتنر سابق چه زمانی هنوز …
سلام. فکر کنم این اولین باره که کپشن جافکری رو نه از زبان امیرعلی، بلکه از طرف تیم جافکری و خطاب به خودِ امیرعلی مینویسیم. این ویدیو هدیهی ما به امیرعلیه؛ ویدیویی که بدون اینکه خودش چیزی ازش بدونه، با «دایی»، اولین مهمان جافکری، ضبطش کردیم. به مناسبت ششمین سالگرد جافکری، خواستیم یک بار هم ما از کسی تشکر کنیم که این مسیر رو شروع کرد، ساخت و شش سال ادامهاش داد. و البته این تشکر فقط برای امیرعلی نیست. برای شما هم …
قسمتی از صحبتهای ما در اپیزود دوم فصل سی و دو با موضوع سهم من از تو. شما میتونید نسخهی کامل این اپیزود رو در کستباکس جافکری بشنوید یا در کانال یوتیوب جافکری تماشا کنید! 💎 #جافکری #پادکست_فارسی @Jafekri
توی رابطه، فقط دوست داشته شدن کافی نیست. ما دلمون میخواد برای طرف مقابلمون «خاص» باشیم؛ دلمون میخواد بدونیم یه چیزی بین ما هست که بین اون و بقیه نیست. اما از یه جایی به بعد، سؤالهای سختتری شروع میشن: سهم من از تو کجاست؟ تا کجا حق دارم سؤال کنم؟ کِی دارم از رابطهمون مراقبت میکنم و کِی دارم کنترلش میکنم؟ اصلاً وقتی پای «ما» وسطه، مرز بین خواستهی من و آزادی تو کجاست؟ توی این اپیزود میریم سراغ همین مرزهای خاکست…
قسمتی از صحبتهای ما در اپیزود اول فصل سی و دو با موضوع جایی میان من و ما. شما میتونید نسخهی کامل این اپیزود رو در کستباکس جافکری بشنوید یا در کانال یوتیوب جافکری تماشا کنید! 💎 #جافکری #پادکست_فارسی @Jafekri
خیلی وقتها عشق رو با «یکی شدن» تعریف میکنیم؛ اینکه من و تویی باقی نمونه و همهچیز تبدیل به «ما» بشه. اما یک رابطهی سالم قرار نیست با از دست رفتن فردیت ما ساخته بشه. پس ما چطور قراره بدون از دست رفتن خودمون به کسی نزدیک بشیم؟ تو این فصل میخواهیم دربارهی مرزها تو رابطهی عاطفی صحبت کنیم؛ اینکه چطور میتونیم یک «ما» قوی بسازیم، بدون اینکه «من» خودمون رو فراموش کنیم. بفهمیم چه چیزی مسئولیت منه، چه چیزی متعلق به توئه…
قسمتی از صحبتهای ما در اپیزود ششم فصل سی و یک با موضوع نردبان التیام. شما میتونید نسخهی کامل این اپیزود رو در کستباکس جافکری بشنوید یا در کانال یوتیوب جافکری تماشا کنید! 💎 #جافکری #پادکست_فارسی @Jafekri
التیام تروما پاک کردن گذشته نیست؛ التیام یعنی دوباره به بدن، احساسات، علایق و رابطههامون برگردیم و کمکم یاد بگیریم به زندگی اعتماد کنیم. و اما درمان از جایی شروع میشه که بهجای اجتناب، دوباره وارد زندگی بشیم؛ عشق رو تجربه کنیم، رابطههای امن بسازیم و اجازه بدیم جهان، فقط محل خطر نباشه. یاد بگیریم نشونه ی بهبود ما این نیست که دیگه زخمی نمیشیم؛ اینه که زخم، دیگه محل توقف ما نیست. وقتی امنتر بشیم، نه فقط زندگی خودم…
قسمتی از صحبتهای ما در اپیزود پنجم فصل سی و یک با موضوع پنجره تحمل. شما میتونید نسخهی کامل این اپیزود رو در کستباکس جافکری بشنوید یا در کانال یوتیوب جافکری تماشا کنید! 💎 #جافکری #پادکست_فارسی @Jafekri
گاهی چیزی که ما رو تو همون نقطهی آشنا نگه میداره، امنیت نیست؛ ترسیه که اجازه نمیده از محدودهی قبلی خودمون عبور کنیم. تروما میتونه پنجرهی تحمل ما رو محدود کنه؛ تا جایی که تغییر، تجربهی تازه یا حتی رؤیای بزرگتر برامون چیزی شبیه احساس خطر باشه. اما رشد از جایی شروع میشه که قدمبهقدم وارد تنشها میشیم. تنشهایی که تا دیروز از اونها فاصله میگرفتیم و حالا با تجربه و مهارت، اونها رو کم کم از احساس «تنش» به احساس «…
قسمتی از صحبتهای ما در اپیزود چهارم فصل سی و یک با موضوع اعتیاد یقه سفید. شما میتونید نسخهی کامل این اپیزود رو در کستباکس جافکری بشنوید یا در کانال یوتیوب جافکری تماشا کنید! 💎 #جافکری #پادکست_فارسی @Jafekri
ممکنه که سالها فکر کنیم انتخابهامون حاصل سلیقه، میل به پیشرفت یا شخصیت خودمون بوده؛ در حالی که بعضی از اونها جایی تو دل یک تجربهی دردناک شکل گرفتن. گاهی کار زیاد، موفقیتطلبی، پول، سفر یا همیشه مشغول موندن، فقط علاقه یا بلندپروازی نیستن؛ میتونن به چیزی تبدیل بشن که اضطراب و رنج رو برامون قابلتحملتر میکنه. همون چیزی که تو این اپیزود ازش با عنوان «اعتیاد یقهسفید» یاد میکنیم. ما باید بفهمیم انتخابهای ما، از خو…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @jafekri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پادکست جافِكری” (@jafekri), 41,175 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jafekri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.