Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

대왕밀크티의 능동적 세상읽기

@milkteaking42

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,043subscribers

+191 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002231637816
TypeChannel
Username@milkteaking42
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/milkteaking42

Growth

8521,043947.56 August 2026 — 852 subscribers6 August 2026 — 852 subscribers7 August 2026 — 984 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 823–1,072 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:061,043+59
7 Aug 2026, 01:56984+132
6 Aug 2026, 14:50852no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:03852first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
131.0%
avg views ÷ 1,043 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.426%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total17,766
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3291.4%
👍38.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈6,580 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

최근에 느끼는 점: 산업쟁이와 주식쟁이들은 타임프레임이 다른 경우가 많음. 즉 업황과 주가는 원래 아주 오랜 시간동안 괴리가 있을 수 있다는 걸 받아들여야 함. 그래서 난 솔직히 자기가 가치투자자라고 말하면서 청산 당할 수 있는 레버리지를 쓰는 사람은 믿지 않음. 그러니깐 누구보다 완벽하게 펀더와 산업을 공부해서 오랫동안 홀딩하던지 (이러면 주가 반토막 나면 좋아해야 하는 거 아닌가? 근데 대부분이 주가 반토막 나면 내가 모르는 뭔가 있다보다 하고 도망가더라. 이게 가능하려면 정말 상상 그 이상의 공부와 심법이 필요한 듯) 본인이 추세추종 매매를 하고 있다는 걸 인지하고 추세가 꺾였을 때 기계적으로 팔던지. 아니면 계좌를 분리해서 다르게 운용하던지 해야할 듯.

12

6 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 6 August 2026

전설적 엔지니어 Jeff Dean이 27년간 몸 담고 있던 구글을 떠나서 스타트업을 창업함. AI의 궁극적 목표는 에이전트 따위가 아님. 과학의 진보임. Discovery Loop says it plans to use high-octane algorithms to initiate and iterate thousands of experiments simultaneously, with the goal of partially automating the research process and expanding the scale at which experimentation can be conducted. The startup is also interested in using AI to help create more powerful AI (a proc

6 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈3,240 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://www.chosun.com/economy/tech_it/2026/08/06/HMZRQ5DSCBDDJNIZNIKDDOL73U/

6 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC114 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupinPhoto

SemiAnalysis 이제 SK하이닉스의 ADR이 존재함에도 불구하고 왜 마이크론이 SK하이닉스보다 높은 멀티플을 받으며 거래되는지 물어보는 사람들이 있습니다. 이유는 매우 간단합니다. 기업 지배구조(Corporate Governance)가 존재하기 때문입니다.

3

6 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC285 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vinil_11

지금 하닉 빠지는게 이게 이제야 시장에서 돌고 있나보네

2

5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC318 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @alcoholwithmarketPhoto

#소프트웨어 그동안 언와인딩 수혜로 오른것이 아닌지 계속 의심하였던 소프트웨어인데, 깨질때 덜 깨지고 오를때 신고가 영역으로 진입하는 무빙은 우리가 교과서적으로 요구하는 좋은 주식의 자질이 있다고 봐도 된다고 생각. 포트폴리오 내 섹터 편입을 많이 가져갈 필요가 없다고 생각하는 부분은 이전과 동일하나, 기존 AI주도주 외에도 충분히 플레이 가능한 선택지로 들어왔다고 판단 1. #SNOW 2. #PANW 3. #DDOG 4. #FTNT 5. #CRWD

6

5 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC253 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @fundeasy_choi

담당자도 뽑으시는군요 https://jobs.smartrecruiters.com/Solidigm/744000131236641-director-external-reporting?trid=998bc6c9-cfbe-4db9-af4b-d7bb8407f264

5 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC320 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.hankyung.com/article/202608056378i

3

2 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC333 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @milperc

8월 3일 장 전 코멘트 DS투자증권 투자전략 양형모 지난 금요일 한국 증시는 1~2주에 걸쳐 차근차근 소화됐어야 할 가격대별 매물대를 하루 만에 뚫었습니다. 코스피가 14% 넘게 오르고 SK하이닉스가 상장 이래 최대 상승, 삼성전자가 20% 넘게 오르며 언와인딩은 저희 예상보다 빠르고 격렬하게 진행됐습니다. 이제 시장은 기업 실적과 밸류에이션을 보는 정상화 국면으로 진입했습니다. 다만 출렁임은 지속될 것입니다. 두 달여 폭락이 남긴 하락 공포 트라우마 때문이며, 실적과 AI 수요라는 호재와 하반기 전망에서 짚어드린 세 축, 즉 중국 지정학·정치·거시라는 AI 캐펙스의 성을 무너뜨리려는 악재의 줄다리기가 계속될 것이기 때문입니다. 금요일 미국 시장도 변동성이 극심했습니다. 나스닥은 장중 1.3%의 상승분을 전부 반납했다가 +1%로 되살아났

5👍3

31 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC274 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @darthacking

2026.07.31 16:51:19 기업명: 효성티앤씨(시가총액: 1조 3,329억) A298020 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 24,162억(예상치 : 22,570억+/ 7%) 영업익 : 1,888억(예상치 : 1,544억/ +22%) 순이익 : 955억(예상치 : 993억/ -4%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.2Q 24,162억/ 1,888억/ 955억 2026.1Q 20,942억/ 862억/ 509억 2025.4Q 18,432억/ 447억/ -233억 2025.3Q 20,098억/ 561억/ 157억 2025.2Q 18,892억/ 733억/ 214억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260731801117 회사정보: https://f

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @milkteaking42. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 27,685 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“대왕밀크티의 능동적 세상읽기” (@milkteaking42), 1,043 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milkteaking42.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.