Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,196–32,474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 01:38
32,440
+12
14 Sept 2026, 02:59
32,428
-14
12 Sept 2026, 13:42
32,442
+8
10 Sept 2026, 11:57
32,434
+1
7 Sept 2026, 09:56
32,433
-7
4 Sept 2026, 16:39
32,440
+25
3 Sept 2026, 00:05
32,415
-5
2 Sept 2026, 01:24
32,420
-2
1 Sept 2026, 00:15
32,422
+9
31 Aug 2026, 01:37
32,413
+5
30 Aug 2026, 03:24
32,408
+19
29 Aug 2026, 05:43
32,389
+5
28 Aug 2026, 07:13
32,384
-2
27 Aug 2026, 09:53
32,386
+18
26 Aug 2026, 12:48
32,368
+12
25 Aug 2026, 12:24
32,356
+26
24 Aug 2026, 09:57
32,330
+12
22 Aug 2026, 20:19
32,318
+6
21 Aug 2026, 12:06
32,312
+6
19 Aug 2026, 10:25
32,306
first reading
Engagement
115 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 32,440 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,390
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 115 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
115 (24 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
203,411
Reactions total
3,278
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,970
Videos
≈808
Links
≈531
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19m 16s
Average length
3m 13s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,267 reactions across 113 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,447
71.0%
😢
818
13.1%
😁
307
4.90%
👍
179
2.86%
❤🔥
147
2.35%
💔
91
1.45%
🔥
76
1.21%
🕊
32
0.511%
👏
29
0.463%
😍
27
0.431%
🥴
24
0.383%
💯
22
0.351%
👌
19
0.303%
🤯
16
0.255%
🤔
12
0.191%
😱
11
0.176%
🤩
5
0.08%
🤬
4
0.064%
🎉
1
0.016%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,411 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من طُغيان المادية على النفوس تصوُّرُ كثيرٍ من الناس أن مفهوم " الرزق " منحصر في الأشياء المادية المحسوسة التي ترجع إلى المال، والنفوذ، والجاه، والمناصب؛ حتى إنهم بشكل لا شعوري إذا دعَوا أو دُعي لهم بسعة الرزق أو سمعوا هذه الكلمة تنصرف أذهانهم تلقائيا إلى هذه الأمور.
ولا شك أن هذه الأشياء من الرزق، ولكنه غير منحصر فيها، بل هو أوسع من ذلك، وإذا تأمل الإنسان في حاله وانعتق قليلا من أسْر المادية وجد في نفسه من النعم ما …
واعلم أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم كان طبيبَ القلوب، فأتى على ترتيب الأطباء.
وترتيبُهم أن الحالَ إذا أمكن إصلاحُه بالغذاء لا يستعملون الدواء، وما أمكن إصلاحُه بالدواء الضعيفِ لا يستعملون الدواء القويَّ، ثم إذا عجزوا عن المداواة بالمشروبات وغيرها عدلوا إلى الحديد والكَيِّ، وقيل: آخِرُ الدواء الكيّ.
فالنبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أولاً أمر القلوبَ بذِكر الله فحسب فإن (بذكر الله تطمئنُّ القلوب) كما أن بالغذاء تطمئنُّ النف…
"لا تيأس من قَبول عملٍ لم تجِد فيه وُجودَ الحضور، فرُبَّما قُبل من العمل ما لم تُدرَك ثمرتُه عاجلاً":
أي: إذا لم تجد العلامة على قَبول العمل، التي هي حضور قلبك فيه مع الله تعالى بأن تلاحظ أنك حاضر بين يديه، فلا تيأس من قبوله؛ فإنّها علامةٌ، والعلامة لا تطَّرِد؛ لأنه رُبّما قُبل من العمل ما لم تُدرَك ثمرتُه: أي علامةُ قبوله عاجلاً، وإنّما الشَّرطُ في القَبول: الإخلاص، أي قصْد وجه الله تعالى بالعمل.
وأمّا الحضور بالق…
فإن قال قائل: إذا كانت المقدمات ضروريةً صادقةً والعقول مشتملة عليها، وهذا الترتيب الذي ذكرتموه في صورة القياس أيضا واضح، فمن أين ثارتِ الخلافات بين الناس في المعقولات؟!.
قلنا: إنما كان ذلك لقصور أكثر الأفهام عن مراعاة الشروط، ومَن يتأمَّلها لم يتعجَّب من مخالفة المخالف فيها؛ لا سيما وأدلة العقول تنساق إلى نتائج لا يُذعِن الوهمُ لها، بل يُكذِّب بها، لا كالعلوم الحسابية؛ فإن الوهم والعقل يتعاونان فيها، ثم مَن لا يعرف …
وفي البخاري عن كعب بن مالك رضي الله عنه قال:
كان رسول الله ﷺ إذا سُرَّ استنار وجهه كأنّه قطعة قمر، وكنا نعرف ذلك منه اهـ.
ولا يُفهم من هذا أنّ استنارة وجهه خاصةٌ بوقت السرور؛ لأنَّ أصلها ظاهر في كل وقت؛ لأنَّ نورانيته ﷺ ذاتيّة لازمة، وكمالها وتمامها خاصٌّ بوقت السرور.
وهذا أمرٌ معروف في كل حُسنٍ يتجلّى تمام حسنه عند السرور، وقد دخل ﷺ على عائشة وأساريره تبرُقُ – أي يلمعُ منها شبه البرق – فقالت: يا رسول الله أنت أحق…
وفي البخاري عن كعب بن مالك قال: كان رسول الله ﷺ إذا سُرَّ استنار وجهه كأنّه قطعة قمر، وكنا نعرف ذلك منه.اه.
اعلم أنّ تشبيه بعض صفاته ﷺ بنحو الشمس والقمر، إنّما يصحّ على ضربٍ من التّجوّز، بل هما اللّذان يُشبَّهان بنوره ﷺ؛ إذ الأضعفُ هو الذي يُشبَّه بالأقوى.
وما يقع في المديح من تشبيهه ﷺ بالشمس والقمر والسراج؛ فالمراد منه التمثيل بأحسن ما يُعرف في الوجود، وإلّا فهذه الأضواء به استنارت، فهي كالفروع ونورُه الأصل، وهي …
" قد نرى تقلُّب وَجهِك في السماء" أي عَلِمْنا سؤالك عما لم تُفصِح عنه بلسان الدعاء، فَغَيَّرْنا القِبلة لأجلك، وهذا غاية ما يَفعل الحبيبُ لأجل الحبيب.
كل العبيد يجتهدون في طلبِ رضاي، وأنا أطلبُ رضاك " فلنُولِّينّك قِبلةً ترضاها".
- الإمام القُشيري-
وفي حديث عائشة: " ما أرى ربك إلا يُسارِع في هواك".
قال الحافظ ابن حجر: أي ما أرى الله إلا مُوجِداً لِمَا تريد بلا تأخير، مُنزِلًا لِما تُحِبّ وتختار.
في " إنباه الرواة" للقفطي، قال:
" شاهدتُّ على نسخةٍ من كتاب "إصلاح المنطق"، يقرُب أن يكون بخط المَعرّيين، أن الخطيب أبا زكريا يحيى بن علي بن الخطيب التّبريزي قرأه على أبي العلاء، وطالبَه بسنده متصلاً، فقال له:
إن أردتَّ الدراية فخُذ عني ولا تتعدّ، وإن قصدتَّ الرواية فعليك بما عند غيري". اه
وقد كان لأبي العلاء رواية لبعض كتب اللغة وغريب الحديث إلا أنه لم يكن مُكثِرا، وكان انصرافه إلى العلم وتحرير المسائل، فهو من ال…
من العناوين المُوهِمة: كتاب مناقب الأئمة الأربعة، للقاضي أبي بكر الباقلاني، فكثيرا ما يُظن أن هذا الكتاب في فضائل الفقهاء أرباب المذاهب السُّنية الأربعة، وهم أبو حنيفة، ومالك، والشافعي، وأحمد، رحمهم الله تعالى، وقد رأيتُ بعض الأفاضل يَعرض هذا الكتاب ظانًّا أنه في هذا الغرَض، في حين أن الكتاب يتحدّث عن مناقب الخلفاء الراشدين الأربعة: أبو بكر، وعمر، وعثمان، وعليّ، رضي الله عنهم، فهم المقصودون بالأئمة في سِياق هذا التأل…
وكان سببُ توجُّه الخطيب التبريزي إلى أبي العلاء المعري أنه حصَلت له نسخة من كتاب " التهذيب " في اللغة، تأليف أبي منصور الأزهري في عدة مجلدات لطاف، وأراد تحقيقَ ما فيها وأخْذها عن رجل عالم باللغة، فدُلَّ على المعري، فجعل الكتابَ في مِخلاة وحمَلها على كتفه من تبريز إلى المعرة، ولم يكن له ما يستأجر به مركوباً، فنفَذ العَرَقُ من ظهره إليها فأثَّر فيها البَلل، وهي ببعض الوقوف ببغداد، وإذا رآها من لا يَعرف صورة الحال فيها …
من الأخطاء المشهورة المُتداوَلة في ترتيب كتب التفاسير : جعلُ تفسير الجلالين موضوعا للمبتدئين، نظرا إلى صِغر حجمه واختصار عبارته، مع أن واقع هذا التفسير غير ذلك، فإشاراته دقيقة وعباراته غامضة أحيانا، وتفكيكها وبيان ما أُدمِج فيها من المباحث والمسائل يقتضي تطويلا أصلا، بل لو عُدَّ هذا التفسير عُصارة وخُلاصة غيره من كتب التفسير لم يكن ذلك بعيدا، ومِن ثَم فجعلُه للمنتهين هو الأقرب، اللهم إلا أن يكون المُطالع يكتفي بظاهر …
❤53👍8👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @alnatheerr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alnatheerr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تحميل كتب جودة عالية📚 @koutobi · 75,310 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
جَامِعْ تُرَاثِ المِنْشَاوِيْ 📻 @El_minshawy · 108,729 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
أحمد الجوهري @algoharyahmad · 39,728 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
كناش الأنظار والفوائد @tr728 · 22,171 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
عالم الكتاب @ahn2323 · 58,354 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
مكتبة د. حسين كريم الدلفي للغة العربية @hsn788 · 31,008 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
عِرفان @aerfanalruooh · 38,696 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
كتب اسلامية - كتب دينية @Islamicbookssss · 67,629 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
مكتبة عمر عكاشة @omerokasha · 22,839 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026
مكتبة الرضا - كتب إلكترونية مجانية @elredabooks · 24,111 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
مكتبة الأدب العربي @dewan55 · 29,488 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
مكتبة سُرَ مَن قَرأ @soramnqraa · 90,303 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
قطوف - علّموا الناس الخير @Qutooff · 103,657 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
عبدالله الوهيبي @aalwhebey · 26,567 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
درع الأمة @UmahShield · 29,837 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
کتب مفیدة و نادرة📚 @ktbmfid · 76,081 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
المفقود من تراث شيخ العمود @shikhalamood · 45,258 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
مكتبة ابن ادريس @ibnidris · 25,621 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
السبيل @al_sabeel · 24,001 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
د. سامي عامري @Dr_Sami_Ameri · 29,170 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
فاتحون🔻 @fathoon · 26,311 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
{📕فَوَائِدُ التَّلْبَنْتِي} @aaltalabanty · 22,075 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
مكتبة المثنوي @lmatnawi · 39,990 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
مكتبة بــورسـيــبــا @Borsippa_Library · 53,095 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 130 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أفكار وأسْمَار” (@alnatheerr), 32,440 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alnatheerr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
