National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 53 days, net +167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,010–44,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 12:36
44,260
+12
17 Sept 2026, 18:59
44,248
+16
15 Sept 2026, 18:38
44,232
-1
14 Sept 2026, 02:20
44,233
-19
12 Sept 2026, 07:16
44,252
+28
9 Sept 2026, 23:17
44,224
-34
6 Sept 2026, 18:00
44,258
+67
4 Sept 2026, 03:01
44,191
+59
2 Sept 2026, 17:44
44,132
-11
1 Sept 2026, 14:06
44,143
-17
31 Aug 2026, 17:06
44,160
-8
30 Aug 2026, 13:56
44,168
+8
29 Aug 2026, 11:08
44,160
+12
28 Aug 2026, 14:12
44,148
+17
27 Aug 2026, 16:12
44,131
+41
26 Aug 2026, 19:44
44,090
-23
25 Aug 2026, 18:49
44,113
+13
24 Aug 2026, 21:56
44,100
-12
23 Aug 2026, 06:24
44,112
+16
21 Aug 2026, 21:27
44,096
first reading
Engagement
104 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 44,260 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,770
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.484%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 104 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
104 (31 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
238,630
Reactions total
1,154
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 23:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
916
Videos
15
Links
260
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 55s
Average length
1m 55s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,465 reactions across 104 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,771
71.8%
👍
281
11.4%
🔥
225
9.13%
👎
87
3.53%
👏
29
1.18%
🤬
26
1.05%
😢
22
0.892%
😁
18
0.73%
🤔
4
0.162%
😎
2
0.081%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
أظهر مسار تصنيع الصواريخ في غزة استبعاداً مبكراً لفكرة الإصابة النقطية الدقيقة بسبب غياب تقنيات التوجيه المتقدمة. واستُبدلت تلك المنظومات بفلسفة الإغراق الناري الهادفة إلى إحداث شلل واسع بالاعتماد على كثافة الإطلاق وتوسيع المدى. فإلى أي مدى تأثَّرت هذه المنظومة بعد استهداف منصات الإطلاق الأرضية؟
تجدون التقرير كاملاً من خلال الرابط:
https://t.me/alkhattabirw/27421
#تقارير_الخطابي
#فلسطين
تنوّعت عوائق تصنيع صواريخ غزة، من حظر المواد الخام، إلى تحديات فيزيائية جعلت النماذج الأولى تتلوَّى في الهواء وتسقط عند قواعد إطلاقها. فكيف تحولت ورش الخراطة البسيطة المجزَّأة تحت الأرض إلى آلات ذات خطوط إنتاج تحاكي المصانع؟
تجدون التقرير كاملاً من خلال الرابط:
https://t.me/alkhattabirw/27421
#تقارير_الخطابي
#فلسطين
صواريخ القسام.. القصة كاملة
من ورش بسيطة إلى صواريخ هزت الكيان... كيف تحولت الفكرة إلى قوة صاروخية أعادت رسم قواعد الاشتباك؟
كيف استطاع القسام توفير المواد الأولية وسط الحصار، وتطوير الاستقرار الهوائي وجودة التصنيع والقوة التدميرية؟
نكشف في هذه المادة قصة تأسيس وتطور المنظومة الصاروخية لكتائب القسام، بدءًا من جهود الشهداء نضال فرحات وتيتو مسعود، وصولًا إلى الشهيد جمال الزبدة، وكيف كشفت معركة سيف القدس عام 2021 عن …
تقف أفغانستان أمام مشهد أمني جديد يختبر صلابة وتماسك الإمارة الإسلامية بعد 5 سنوات من عودتها للحكم. وتيرة التمردات الداخلية المحدودة تتصاعد، في وقت تلوح فيه بوادر تحول استراتيجي خطير في سياسات دول الجوار ينذر بتحويل المعارضة المشتتة إلى جبهة استنزاف منظمة.
في مادة "من المعارضة المحدودة إلى التهديد الخارجي: التحديات الأمنية للإمارة الإسلامية في 2026"، نقدم قراءة تحليلية عميقة تفكك طبيعة التحديات الميدانية الأخيرة بدء…
بعد 5 سنوات من إحكام السيطرة الأمنية وتوطيد أركان الحكم تقف الإمارة الإسلامية في أفغانستان أمام منعطف أمني خلال عام 2026م.
تبدو التمردات المحلية والخلافات حول إدارة الموارد والعمليات الخاطفة لجماعات المعارضة أحداثاً معزولة يسهل إخمادها، بَيدَ أن الخطورة الحقيقية تكمن في تقاطع هذه التوترات مع دعم إقليمي منظم يهدد بتوحيد جبهات الخصوم، وتصعيد التهديدات الأمنية ضد الإمارة
في مادة "من المعارضة المحدودة إلى التهديد الخارجي…
سقوط المخا في يد الحوثيين حوَّل الساحل الغربي من ورقة ضغط إلى واقعٍ ميداني يُهدِّد الملاحة الدولية. فهل يحتوي تحالف "الشرعية" والسعودية هذا الاختراق، أم يتغيَّر ميزان الحرب اليمنية بما يتجاوز حدودها؟
#تقارير_الخطابي
#اليمن
تقريرٌ جديد .. لماذا اتسعت جبهات حرب اليمن؟
من هدنة أبريل 2022 إلى دخول الحوثيين المخا في 10 سبتمبر 2026، يتتبّع التقرير كيف انفجرت الجبهات وتحوّلت إلى مسرحٍ واحد تخدم فيه النيرانُ المعركة البرية. ويفكّك التقرير مقدرات الحوثيين وحدودها، وبنية القوات الحكومية وتشكيلاتها العسكرية المتعددة، و يعرج على أثر سقوط المخا على باب المندب والملاحة العالمية.
التقرير كاملًا عبر الرابط المرفق:
#تقارير_الخطابي
#اليمن
#تحليلات_الخطابي: تشكيلات الإسلاميين القتالية المساندة للجيش السوداني (2023-2026)
بدايةً، أكبر تنظيمات الإسلاميين في السودان هو تنظيم الحركة الإسلامية المتَّبع لمنهج جماعة الإخوان المسلمين فكرياً، وإن كان منشقٌ عنها تنظيمياً، وهو صاحب نفوذ كبير في الجيش والشرطة والأمن نتيجة حكمه لثلاثين سنة (1989-2019)، وحتى بعد تغير الحكومة بثورة 2019م، ظلت القوى النظامية المختلفة بنفس تركيبتها، اللهم إلا بعض التغييرات الطفيفة للش…
القوة الخشنة.. ما لا يسع الدبلوماسي قوله
#القوة_الخشنة
#سلسلة_مفاهيم_عسكرية
#الخطابي
👍10🔥5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @alkhattabirw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
نورس للدراسات @NORSFS2 · 110,731 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
شركة نماء للاستثمار @IPDepartment · 21,470 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 23 September 2026
أحمد مولانا @AhmedMawlana · 43,576 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
رؤى لدراسات الحرب @RoaaWarStudies · 213,980 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
أحمد قنيطة @a2qanita1 · 21,742 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
كتب فلسطين 🇵🇸 𓂆 @palkotob · 20,997 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 September 2026
مجدي المغربي - فلسطين - قطاع غزة @mogr7775 · 21,122 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
أس الصراع في الشام @asseraaalsham1 · 44,099 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
شبكة رصد @RassdNewsN · 48,684 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Metras - متراس @metrasweb · 21,355 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
درع الأمة @UmahShield · 29,732 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
الشيخ عبد الرزاق المهدي @Abedrazzakmahddii · 34,867 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
الإعلام العسكري - نيوز @alaskari_news · 41,591 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
طاهر العمر @zaboomaralsori · 74,188 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
شبكة أخبار سوريا الحرة @ALMHARAR · 339,686 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
قناة د. وصفي أبو زيد @drwasfy · 30,578 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
الإعلام العسكري - سوريا @alaskari_mediaa · 44,182 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
أرشيف الإلباين كويست AlpineQuest @ALPINE_QUEST · 27,755 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 10 September 2026
قناة الإعلامي أحمد منصور @Ahmedmansouraja · 98,351 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
القناة الإخبارية الدولية @rsjlb · 46,922 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
السبيل @al_sabeel · 24,001 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
نون بوست @noonpost · 30,930 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
أبو أمين 80 @syrianevent1 · 20,262 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 September 2026
قناة محمد سرور النجار @Prfmsoror · 20,446 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 122 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مركز الخطابي للدراسات” (@alkhattabirw), 44,260 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alkhattabirw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.