National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 568 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
67 measurements spanning 99 days, net -52,700. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,293,050–1,361,560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 01:26
1,300,955
-1,608
10 Nov 2026, 16:56
1,302,563
-666
9 Nov 2026, 06:07
1,303,229
-720
7 Nov 2026, 19:40
1,303,949
-365
6 Nov 2026, 18:39
1,304,314
-666
5 Nov 2026, 19:58
1,304,980
-544
4 Nov 2026, 21:05
1,305,524
+182
3 Nov 2026, 18:28
1,305,342
+264
2 Nov 2026, 20:45
1,305,078
-513
1 Nov 2026, 18:38
1,305,591
-576
31 Oct 2026, 21:35
1,306,167
-469
30 Oct 2026, 23:58
1,306,636
-527
30 Oct 2026, 00:56
1,307,163
-668
28 Oct 2026, 21:29
1,307,831
+245
27 Oct 2026, 23:36
1,307,586
+660
26 Oct 2026, 20:08
1,306,926
-149
25 Oct 2026, 23:16
1,307,075
-60
25 Oct 2026, 00:09
1,307,135
-267
24 Oct 2026, 00:27
1,307,402
-98
22 Oct 2026, 21:36
1,307,500
first reading
What this channel posts
Photos
≈508
Videos
≈220
Links
≈9,490
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 4,389 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (1,376 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 2,999 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.3 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 29.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 76.4% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 50,200 views — 3.86% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 66,400).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 15,800 → 3.0 hours: 38,095 interp.still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
83 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
عاجل | الناطق العسكري باسم أنصار الله #الحوثيين: الادعاء باعتراض مسيرتين فوق #مكة_المكرمة والمدينة المنورة كذب وافتراء
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ajanews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ajanews edited 24 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @ajanews as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
43 minutes
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 64 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mahmoud Abbas @MahmodAbbas · 20,899 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
حرب اليمن _ الشرق الأوسط #امريكا الملاحة الامريكية @EsraelMn · 28,380 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
العربي الجديد | Alaraby Al Jadeed @alarabyar · 21,913 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
وكالة الأناضول @aa_arabic · 22,546 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
AlJazeera Net | الجزيرة نت @Ajarabicnet · 22,642 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
اخبار الجزيزه @ALGzerh7 · 30,005 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 September 2026
المسافة صفر @Ahrar222 · 24,177 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 September 2026
عربي بوست @arabicpost_me · 24,355 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
معركة طوفان الأقصى @alaqsa_6ofan · 33,765 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
كتائب الشهيد عز الدين القسام "الإحتياطيه" @TTT_TTn · 52,796 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
مجلة ميم.. مِرآتنا @MeemMagazine · 30,026 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
الجزيرة عاجل @aljazeeraBrk · 38,454 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
وكالة معا الإخبارية @maannews · 39,456 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
أحمد دراوشة - التلفزيون العربي @AhmadDarawsheh · 42,721 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
القناة الإخبارية الدولية @rsjlb · 45,797 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
إذاعة صوت القدس @qudsradiofm1 · 50,641 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Alghadtv - قناة الغد @alghadtvofficial · 53,001 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
موقع عرب 48 @arab48official · 54,498 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
قناة المتحدث الرسمي للقوات المسلحة اليمنية العميد يحيى سريع @Yahyaisfast · 63,728 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
وكالة ستيب الإخبارية - Step News Agency @stepnews · 68,383 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
ألإعلام العبري بالعربي @MAH103MMED · 80,191 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
قناة الإعلامي أحمد منصور @Ahmedmansouraja · 96,629 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
Hanzala @hanzpal20 · 104,512 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
الحدث @alhadath · 101,192 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 481 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة الجزيرة” (@ajanews), 1,300,955 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ajanews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.