يا نورُ يومَ وُلدتَ قامت عِزةٌ للأرض إذْ أمسَت لنورك تنتمي

Channel
أحمد الجوهري
@algoharyahmad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,119subscribers
-1,184 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001146135646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @algoharyahmad |
| Created | 2 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/algoharyahmad |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 19:08 | 39,119 | -27 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 14:07 | 39,146 | +9 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 00:44 | 39,137 | +19 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:20 | 39,118 | -13 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:36 | 39,131 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:26 | 39,138 | -16 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 39,154 | -24 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:36 | 39,178 | -14 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:06 | 39,192 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:01 | 39,197 | -21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 39,218 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 39,223 | -22 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 39,245 | -18 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 39,263 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 39,276 | -17 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 39,293 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 39,300 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 39,313 | -17 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:09 | 39,330 | -22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 39,352 | first reading |
Engagement
185 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 185 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
أحب الدغيم في الشأن السوري، فقد خدم قضية سوريا بينما تأخر غيره. وأرى أن عليه اعتذارًا واجبًا لفلسطين وشهدائها يزيد تأخره غضب النفوس منه، ولها العذر. وأحب لفلسطين ومحبيها أن يحافظوا على إجماع الدنيا على قضيتهم وألا يفرطوا في أحد في مسيرتهم إلى الظفر بحقهم. وأرى ألا يسرفوا في الشدة ولا يغلوا في التنقص.
مكتوب على باب العلم: شفاءٌ من كلِّ داء.
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
د. حسن الشافعي: "إن لم تستطع أن تقول الحقيقة كلها فلا تقل الباطل أبدًا"
File, posted without a caption
أكرمنا الله ببدء التعليق على (رياض الصالحين) في مجلس شهري مطوَّل. وقد جريت في هذا المجلس على طريقة هي: ١- قراءة الحديث بتمعن. ٢- تعيين موضع الشاهد منه للباب الذي ورد فيه. ٣- الكلام على هذا الموضع واستخراج كل فوائده. ٤- السكوت عما سوى هذا. واتبعت الطريقة نفسها مع الآيات الكريمة التي يصدِّر بها الإمام النووي - أسكنه الله الفردوس! - الباب. وهي ذات الطريقة التي اتبعتها في الشرح على غالب كتب السنة التي وفقني الله تعالى …
لماذا تشمئز نفوس البعض عندما نكتب: علموا الناس أن يسألوا الله وحده. ويلجأوا إلى الله وحده. ويستعينوا بالله وحده. ويستعيذوا ويستغيثوا بالله وحده. لماذا يكرهون أن يقبل الناس على الله وحده وينصرفوا عمن دونه؟!
https://youtu.be/o_N_9lxeyF8?si=e_qfC0hVBMnMiQvU
File, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/npdxXvp21pw?si=EefgHgAtqz20s7fy
Showing the 12 most recent of 185 posts we hold for @algoharyahmad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @algoharyahmad as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 16 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
في برنامج إثراء، (فرع القراءة الحرة) معنا قريبًا من مئة عنوان، هل أنت مستعد لنبدأ معنا هذه الرحلة المفيدة؟!
- نعم مستعد.54%
- ألحق بكم بعد مدة.14%
- أحب هذا لكن جدولي ممتلئ.35%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 185 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fathoon · 25,7715 postsتنمية الشخصية
@mofeedon · 3514 postsرَاحِلاً أَبْتَغِي طَيّبَ الأثَرِ 🤍🕊
@ABN_ALAZHAR · 5712 postsEnglish House
@hossamhassan4 · 202 posts[ الفقيهُ الشافعيُّ ]
@FaQSha · 2,8721 postقَبَس - Qabs
@Qabas_10 · 4431 postسمية صالح
@Somaya_Saleh · 4351 postالتأهيل الفقهي على مذهب الإمام الشافعي
@TFShafi · 2,4801 postالبلاء الشديد...والميلاد الجديد
@albalae · 1651 postقناة مسابقة إتقان في تفسير القرآن
@alemrabbany_itqan2 · 1,0171 postدورة الاستعداد لرمضان للدكتور أحمد عبد المنعم "فاتحون"
@alestidadramadanfathoon · 20,3431 postفاستقم كما أُمِرت
@allahakram1 · 1,5161 postالمشتاقة للفردوس
@almoshtaqallferdaws · 1501 post📚إعلانات الدورات الدينية📚
@course_announcements · 10,7961 post🔻دورة فاتحون "فلسطين حتى لاتكون أندلسا أخرى"🔻
@daortfathoonpalasteen · 45,1541 postكانت هنا قناة
@documentary2001 · 1,9151 postدورة التزمت ثم ماذا د. حازم شومان.
@eltzam65 · 5,6031 postالمُقتفَى Almo9tafa🔻
@farta9eb · 4571 postدورات فاتحون
@fathoon33 · 9,6491 postعبق التاريخ
@fragrant_history · 8071 postغراس القلوب 🌱
@gheerassalqoloob · 5411 postغراس الامل
@ghiras_alamal · 2051 postالكاتب والمحقق حامد الطاهر _القناة الرسمية
@hamedtaheri192 · 4,3841 postIsraaLights 🌴 الإسراء
@israalights · 3081 postكُنَّاشةُ أبَوُ عَمِرُ الغَزيِّ
@konashaboamr · 2341 postلَحظْة فَاصِلَة🌱❤️
@lahzafasla · 1,2441 postلمى خاطر
@lamakhater1 · 2,7741 postمحمد يحيى
@mohammed_yehya001 · 3351 postAnfel cheyma
@nofacham · 1,1511 postالقُبــــة 🔻
@seeyrwaalaam · 321 postمُختاراتٌ إيمانية
@tafsirayat_quran · 541 postتَذْكِرَة
@tazkrea · 4,1621 postتغريدات إسلامية
@tweterAslam · 4841 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@alsayed_ah · 511,012#1
@Emadhanbalifawaed · 4,140#2
@alqasemm · 5,315#3
@sdkhdr · 11,479#4
@Ahmadhajry · 21,177#5
@melhamy · 103,723#6
@alnatheerr · 32,643#7
@Thaeralhallak · 17,576#8
@sutanalomairi · 38,107#9
@fawaednafeesa · 13,849#10
@alrehlah · 6,230#11
@HusseinAhmed1983 · 98,725#12
@taasisousoli · 13,406#13
@MSA8H1 · 29,924#14
@amr_basioni · 13,559#15
@mmmageed · 13,339#16
@Mahdara_shaf3ia · 11,478#17
@alwakf · 2,726#18
@mohamed_salim · 15,104#19
@annosdiary · 12,598#20
@mjalis_mohdsadiqkhan · 12,792#21
@ahmedsalem81 · 60,545#22
@alqamra · 6,268#23
@mo3inat · 22,238#24
@M_Otaibe · 2,496#25
@saeed_algabry · 24,183#26
@RuHuLLBeYaN · 8,164#27
@ahmad_abdelmon3em · 145,721#28
@SulimanAlnajran · 10,522#29
@hanafiw · 14,798#30
@Abdulrahman_AlMoshed · 8,674#31
@amerbahjat · 32,993#32
@IbnFotoh · 4,857#33
@aerfanalruooh · 38,726#34
@mihad_osol · 19,838#35
@lllmmmlllllll · 22,429#36
@ahlullhadith · 6,105#37
@tr728 · 22,915#38
@mhbaraayasin · 6,611#39
@Ahmedmansouraja · 96,629#40
@AhmedMawlana · 43,565#41
@baraagk · 52,793#42
@ArabAffairsTV · 60,243#43
@EyadQunaibi · 224,515#44
@abo_beshr_alotibe · 2,850#45
@roqua_a · 9,061#46
@aquds · 4,446#47
@qayd_alawabid · 18,598#48
@sam27050 · 16,682#49
@ehyaa7 · 12,087#50
@yousefsom · 11,737#51
@aaltalabanty · 22,161#52
@menhaj_elsunna · 5,737#53
@Prfmsoror · 20,150#54
@darolhadeeth · 1,948#55
@a2qanita1 · 21,420#56
@Qutooff · 102,308#57
@rdodelmeh · 6,093#58
@salem_qq55 · 6,572#59
@Algoayme · 46,131#60
@assdais · 24,141#61
@ahl_alhadith_walathar · 8,498#62
@maymanaplatform · 25,459#63
@hassanalikettani · 5,673#64
@Alhanabla · 12,190#65
@H_Shafe3i · 5,204#66
@zahran_kada · 6,858#67
@abdulwahab7m · 9,407#68
@Mahad_AlsunanArchive · 4,547#69
@tahaelazhre · 6,234#70
@grey_z0ne · 10,437#71
@aaea113 · 15,313#72
@CornerOfHwashi · 17,398#73
@sari_orabi · 12,651#74
@waelh1399 · 18,026#75
@mostafaame · 3,730#76
@eqtebasaati · 8,550#77
@alshafe3i · 2,075#78
@ahmad_zayed · 5,355#79
@alfikh · 14,804#80
@mohdromih_drs · 12,176#81
@Kbahaa · 23,569#82
@pinnace_momeh · 2,837#83
@YamanKhalilAlMuflehAlDoumi · 7,127#84
@Dr_Sami_Ameri · 29,327#85
@iqtenas · 5,181#86
@koutobi · 76,230#87
@alghanm20 · 12,313#88
@ajanews · 1,300,955#89
@sawt_alsudan · 26,235#90
@alkhattabirw · 44,502#91
@NORSFS2 · 108,945#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fathoon · 25,771
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
@mo3inat · 22,238
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
@melhamy · 103,723
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
@eipo0o · 25,897
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
@Alheweny · 184,036
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
@basemelewa · 29,885
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@Ahmadhajry · 21,177
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
@elmasrw · 23,073
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
@fetra20 · 50,320
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
@HusseinAhmed1983 · 98,725
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
@Prfmsoror · 20,150
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
@lllmmmlllllll · 22,429
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
@Qutooff · 102,308
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
@moroor_abir · 22,954
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
@emadahmed4567 · 30,711
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
@Afotouhll · 40,146
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@usraaman · 69,656
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
@itsTheQuraan · 277,363
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
@MHAbdellatif · 20,636
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
@HusseinAhmedChannel · 46,865
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
@Altarefedrr · 45,394
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
@El_minshawy · 108,291
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@saeed_algabry · 24,183
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
@Alsakrandrr · 32,732
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 114 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أحمد الجوهري” (@algoharyahmad), 39,119 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algoharyahmad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.