نستأنف مجلس "المختصر في تفسير القرآن الكريم" - بمشيئة الله تعالى - يوم السبت. ربّ يسر وأعن وتقبل، يا كريم!

Channel
أحمد الجوهري
@algoharyahmad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,205subscribers
-98 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001146135646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @algoharyahmad |
| Description | الشيخ أحمد الجوهري عبد الجواد من علماء الأزهر الشريف |
| Created | 2 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/algoharyahmad |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 40,205 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 40,203 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 40,206 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 40,222 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 40,248 | -34 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 40,282 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 40,303 | first reading |
Engagement
116 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.72%
- avg views ÷ 40,205 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,090
- 114 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 116
- of 116 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 116 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 124,603 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,400
- Videos
- ≈704
- Links
- ≈3,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
(عصفورة الألباني) بين مصر والشام! من الطرق التي يسلكها سدنة الظلم في شغل المسلمين عن عدوهم الحقيقي: "إقامة المعارك الداخلية بين أطياف المجتمع المسلم بغرض إلهائه عنه". مثلما كان يفعل الهالك: (البوطي) مع علماء بلاد الشام - الشيخ (الألباني) وغيره - يوهم الناس أنهم سبب كل بلاء، بينما كان النصيريون والدروز والرافضة في مأمن منه، بل كان يكيل الثناء لبعضهم ويبكي حرقة لما يصيبهم من أذى أو وفاة. وبينما كان الألباني وغيره من …
#تفريغ_الحزب السادس
#تسجيل_الحزب العاشر
#ملف_الحزب العاشر
المختصر في التفسير - المجلس العاشر نلتقي معكم اليوم - بمشيئة الله تعالى - في عاشر مجالس "قراءة المختصر في تفسير القرآن الكريم" عند الساعة 6.00 م بتوقيت مكة المكرمة. رب يسر وأعن يا كريم! قناة البث: https://t.me/algoharyahmad منتدى التعليقات: https://t.me/montadaalgoharyllolom
● رأيت فتاة تكتب تعليقًا على منشور لرجل بطريقة غير مقبولة شرعًا، فماذا أفعل؟ - تكتب لها في رد تحت تعليقها تنصحها برفق وتنهاها بوضوح عن ذلك. ● هل أبحث في صفحتها عن زوجها أو خطيبها وأخبره بما حدث منها؟ - لا، هذا من التعدي. وليس من حدود إنكار المنكر. بل فيه منكرات شرعية أخرى وهي النميمة والتخبيب وربما يترتب عليها مفسدة عظيمة فوق هذا المنكر الذي تسعى في إنكاره. ● وهل أدخل إلى صفحتها وأكلمها في الرسائل أفضل من الرد على …
https://youtu.be/3_3HzXU7Ueg?si=8tHf-lmPUU1z2X-k
https://youtu.be/oQItyVygS3I?si=BbmvQS8rKcUltmDO
أسوأ ما ينطوي عليه صدرك تجاه أولئك العمال الذين ماتوا في طريقهم إلى العمل أنك بريء من دمهم، فكيف بكل من هم في موقع (مسؤول)، إلا من عرف وكره أو بذل الجهد صادقًا في موقعه.
(الجنيه) الذي تعطيه لمتسول إعانة على (الإثم والعدوان) وقد يكون شركة في جريمة. أبواب الصدقات كثيرة ومعلومة. وأقربها أهلك وجيرانك.
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @algoharyahmad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
في برنامج إثراء، (فرع القراءة الحرة) معنا قريبًا من مئة عنوان، هل أنت مستعد لنبدأ معنا هذه الرحلة المفيدة؟!
- نعم مستعد.54%
- ألحق بكم بعد مدة.14%
- أحب هذا لكن جدولي ممتلئ.35%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 26,932 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fathoon · 26,6174 postsإبراهيم سابق
@ibraheemsabik · 7483 postsرَاحِلاً أَبْتَغِي طَيّبَ الأثَرِ 🤍🕊
@ABN_ALAZHAR · 5862 postsEnglish House
@hossamhassan4 · 232 postsالبلاء الشديد...والميلاد الجديد
@albalae · 1651 postقناة مسابقة إتقان في تفسير القرآن
@alemrabbany_itqan2 · 1,0631 postفاستقم كما أُمِرت
@allahakram1 · 1,5871 postالمشتاقة للفردوس
@almoshtaqallferdaws · 1611 post🔻دورة فاتحون "فلسطين حتى لاتكون أندلسا أخرى"🔻
@daortfathoonpalasteen · 46,9171 post[ الفقيهُ الشافعيُّ ]
@FaQSha · 2,8601 postالمُقتفَى Almo9tafa🔻
@farta9eb · 4711 postدورات فاتحون
@fathoon33 · 9,9641 postعبق التاريخ
@fragrant_history · 8261 postغراس القلوب 🌱
@gheerassalqoloob · 5601 postالباحث حامد الطاهر _القناة الرسمية
@hamedtaheri192 · 4,3941 postIsraaLights 🌴 الإسراء
@israalights · 3221 postكُنَّاشةُ أبَوُ عَمِرُ الغَزيِّ
@konashaboamr · 2511 postلمى خاطر
@lamakhater1 · 2,9271 postالقُبــــة 🔻
@seeyrwaalaam · 341 postسمية صالح
@Somaya_Saleh · 4391 postمُختاراتٌ إيمانية
@tafsirayat_quran · 521 postتَذْكِرَة
@tazkrea · 4,1641 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Alheweny · 187,154
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
@itsTheQuraan · 277,179
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
@alsayed_ah · 520,524
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 August 2026
@Quran_Station · 365,885
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
@EyadQunaibi · 222,699
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
@ayatqurancenter · 325,706
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@drhazemshouman · 266,409
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
@Ahmed_Elaraby · 177,586
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
@mhmd5airy · 192,484
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@uraware2014 · 222,943
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@MsjdAboAhmed · 230,763
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أحمد الجوهري” (@algoharyahmad), 40,205 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algoharyahmad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.