Футболки уже можно купить! Ловите ссылку на сайт. А я пока расскажу, что такое plusme👇🏼 Изначально название родилось из Марк + Ева, а потом обрело еще один смысл – plus me: что-то про тебя, для тебя, то, что становится частью тебя. И мне пока совсем не хочется называть plusme моим брендом. Это скорее проект дропов – вещей, которые очень ассоциируются со мной и которые я сама люблю. Сегодня это футболки, осенью б…

Channel
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
125,855subscribers
-408 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001443952539 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proektshmel |
| Description | Здесь мы: ❤️ исследуем жизнь и находим смыслы и тренды в хаосе соцсетей PR и реклама: @konasovamedia Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6735f3214d86083881cd3d5a®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 13 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proektshmel |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 125,855 | -69 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 125,924 | -63 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 125,987 | -55 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 126,042 | -62 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 126,104 | -27 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 126,131 | -79 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 126,210 | -53 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 126,263 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.4%
- avg views ÷ 125,855 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 18,100
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 253,760 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,270
- Videos
- ≈2,420
- Links
- ≈4,140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 44s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Уже видели эти бесконечные пародии на ролики Саши Спилберг, Димы Масленникова и Клавы Коки? Многие из них уже успели перерасти в полноценный такой хейт… Честно говоря, меня это удивило – и я решила разобраться, почему вообще возникает такая реакция 🙂 А от вас мне очень интересно узнать: какие чувства вызывают их видео? Вы видите в них что-то кринжовое, отталкивающее? Или ролики как ролики?
«Никогда не продавай свою квартиру ради покупки общей» Девушки за 30 дают советы девушкам за 20)) Продолжим в комментариях? Подпишись 🐝 | Канал в max
Я такое впервые вижу 😅 Девушка рассказывает, как выложила фото своего букета в сторис, а через время… увидела это свое фото у одногруппницы. Цветочек к цветочку, листочек к листочку. Очевидно, что фото не то, что идентичное – это оно и есть. Но одногруппница до последнего убежала девушку, что ей кажется и фотки просто похожи)) Но! Самое интересное – это реакция на ситуацию: многие написали в комментариях, что нич…
Вы ведь уже видели последний выпуск? Увидела идеальный ролик под него 🤣 Подпишись 🐝 | Канал в max
В Тредсе уже второй день подряд вижу обсуждения одной и той же истории – все дружно встали на сторону кондитера. И я вот тоже хочу с вами это обсудить, потому что ситуация какая-то неоднозначная. Девушка заказала торт, он ей не понравился, и она поставила кондитеру единицу. Кондитер попыталась выяснить, что именно было не так, но заказчица её проигнорировала. А когда появился негативный отзыв, попросила его удалить…
«Моя бирочка 53см❤️» А дальше мама с сыном обнимаются на камеру – и вроде бы ничего такого, но то КАК исполнены большинство этих роликов больше напоминает отношения пары, а не мамы с сыном 🥲 Я знаю, что эту тему вы любите и равнодушной она действительно оставить не может, поэтому скорее зову посмотреть целый ролик про сыночек-корзиночек и их мам 👈🏻
А когда в три ночи только они вдвоем были онлайн? Все понятно, выводы сделаны 😁 ролик: krafftsovaa Подпишись 🐝 | Канал в max
Откуда у всех столько денег!? Первый вопрос, когда видишь у блогеров обзоры на горы одежды, косметики, обуви, сумок и всего-всего-всего… А потом видишь в описании «UGC-креатор» и всё становится на свои места. Или нет? Новый ролик о том, как искренность превратилась в товар уже ждёт на канале 🔔
Девочки, она отомстила за всех 😂 Невеста из Казахстана отдала первый кусок торта своему отцу – после того, как жених отдал свой кусочек матери)) А теперь делитесь: сколько раз пересмотрели ролик?) Подпишись 🐝 | Канал в max
Что я только что прочла 😳 Девушка пишет, что лучшая подруга просила посидеть с ее ребенком, потому что у нее свидания… а свидания оказались с парнем этой девушки. И это не единственная трешовая история в ветке! А у вас было что-то похожее? Почему перестали общаться с подругой? Честно говоря, очень грустно, что такое происходит… Подпишись 🐝 | Канал в max
Если задуматься, я уже нормально так вкладываюсь в экономику Китая 😂 АлиЭкспресс? Да. Поездки в Китай? Да. Я даже была в мебельной столице Фошань и еле удержалась, чтобы не обновить вообще весь дом… Короче, если есть хоть малейшая возможность что-то заказать из Китая – я в деле. Единственное, что иногда останавливало – оплата. Я думала, что с переводами в Китай всё до сих пор сложно, но оказалось уже нет. Несу ва…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @proektshmel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 270,815 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@veronikastepanova20011 · 472,958
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@mosptichka · 471,284
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@daniya_alt · 175,615
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@zhidkovskiy_beauty · 151,513
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@KateClappTelegram · 172,403
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
@kanalnekiy · 182,314
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
@pushmanjulia · 187,189
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
@femalememes · 415,600
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 269,869
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
@profinansy · 582,991
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@lifekarina · 257,496
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
@formemas · 185,821
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
@yobajur · 189,840
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@GALICH_onok · 289,142
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@mikeryna_sashaa · 191,609
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@sofia_stuzhuk_official · 308,345
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
@sudmednotes · 170,135
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@mossgirls · 951,157
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@neopra_blin · 156,441
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,649
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@SuperRu · 198,495
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова” (@proektshmel), 125,855 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proektshmel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.