Channel
@chinastockrestaurant8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,768subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002363912296 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chinastockrestaurant8 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chinastockrestaurant8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 4,768 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 4,767 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 4,772 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 4,774 | +11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 4,763 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 4,763 | first reading |
64 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 38,640 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
17 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 6 | 35.3% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 23.5% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
8월 11일, 골드만삭스는 AI(인공지능) 컴퓨팅 인프라에 대한 투자가 계속 확대됨에 따라 AI 투자 주제가 컴퓨팅 파워 경쟁에서 최종 사용 애플리케이션으로 전환되고 있으며, 휴머노이드 로봇이 다음 성장 엔진이 될 것으로 기대된다는 최신 보고서를 발표했습니다. 골드만 삭스는 휴머노이드 로봇이 아직 기술 검증에서 상용화로 전환 중이며, 대규모 배치는 2027년에서 2029년 사이에 점진적으로 시작될 것으로 예상합니다. 글로벌 휴머노이드 로봇 출하량은 2027년에 76,000대에 달하고 2032년까지 502,000대로 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다. 올해 초부터 국내 휴머노이드 로봇 출하량이 꾸준히 증가하고 있으며, 업계는 '기술 검증'에서 '대량 배송'으로 가속화되고 있습니다. 중심증권의 연구 보고서에 따르면, 주요 제조업체들이 산업 및 상업 현장…
많은 지역에서 자동차 소비 보조금 정책을 더욱 강화했습니다 2026-08-12 00:15 출처: Securities Daily 자동차 소비 확대를 위해 연중 하반기부터 시안, 취안저우, 바오지, 지난, 칭다오, 충칭 등 여러 도시가 새로운 자동차 소비 보조금 활동을 시작했습니다. 중국기업경제학회 부회장 송샹칭은 증권일보에 전역적으로 자동차 소비 보조금 정책을 더욱 업그레이드하고 개선하는 것이 소비 잠재력을 더 잘 발휘하고, 주민들의 다양한 자동차 소비 요구를 효과적으로 충족하며, 자동차 시장의 고품질 발전을 촉진하는 데 도움이 된다고 말했습니다. 이번 조치들에서 자동차 소비를 지역 간 확대하는 두 가지 주요 방향이 나타났다: 보조금 기금 증액과 보조금 범위 확대. 일부 지역에서는 중고차도 자동차 소비 보조금 범위에 포함된다고 발표했습니…
Photo, posted without a caption
오후장 광 관련주들 초급등나옴 A-share 광부품 부문은 계속 상승세를 보였으며, 광지 테크놀로지와 중런 옵틱스가 10% 이상 상승했고, 뒤를 동톈 마이크로, 지즈 테크놀로지, 크리스탈-옵토일렉트로닉스, 웨이브롱스 옵토일렉트로닉스, 고비지아가 뒤를 이었습니다. (来自华尔街见闻APP)
Photo, posted without a caption
미국정부는 제재하려고 하고 기업은 같이 일할려고 하고 ㅎㅎ
😱NVIDIA가 중제욱창과 신이성에 투자할 계획이라는 소문이 있습니다. 회사가 긴급히 대응했다
중국 우시앱텍(WuXi AppTec)이 미국 국방부(DoD)의 중국 군사기업 관련 ‘1260H 리스트’ 지정에 반발해 제기한 소송에서 ‘예비적 금지명령(preliminary injunction)’을 받아냈습니다. 이에 따라 우시앱텍은 본안 소송이 진행되는 동안 1260H 리스트 지정에 따른 즉각적인 불이익을 피할 수 있게 됐습니다. 우시앱텍은 9일 홍콩증권거래소 공시를 통해 ‘미국 컬럼비아특별구 연방 지방법원이 지난 7일(현지시간) 회사가 신청한 예비적 금지명령을 인용했다’고 밝혔습니다. 회사는 이번 결정으로 1260H 리스트 지정을 둘러싼 소송이 진행되는 동안 해당 지정에 따른 즉각적인 불이익을 피할 수 있게 됐다고 설명했습니다. 1260H 리스트는 미 국방부가 미국에서 직접 또는 간접적으로 활동하는 중국 군사기업을 식별하기 위해 관리하…
🤔1
중국은 오늘 뭐 다 오르니깐 정신이 없네요
[JPMorgan, 싱가포르 해협 시간 지수 목표를 6500으로 상향 조정] JPMorgan Chase는 싱가포르 해협 시간대 지수에 대한 목표를 6500포인트로 상향 조정하며, "적절한" 경제 상황이 수익 성장을 촉진하고 당국에 더 큰 재정 유연성을 부여할 것이라고 밝혔다. JP모건 애널리스트들은 "적절한 경제 환경이 주당순이익 성장을 계속 지원하고 재정 여유를 마련할 수 있어야 한다고 믿는다"고 말했다. "평가액이 평년을 넘어섰지만, 싱가포르 해협 타임즈 지수가 재평가되고 높은 수익률과 통화 안정성에 힘입어 다른 선진 시장으로 이동하면서 이 수준은 유지될 것으로 보고 있습니다." JPMorgan은 또한 싱가포르 해협 타임즈 지수의 장-숏 시나리오 목표치를 각각 7,000포인트와 5,000포인트로 상향 조정했습니다.
# 탄산리튬 반등하니 리튬주들 급등🔥🔥🔥 锂矿概念异动拉升 永杉锂业直线涨停 锂矿概念盘中异动拉升，永杉锂业直线涨停，盛新锂能、天华新能、国城矿业、大中矿业、融捷股份等跟涨。
실적 망가지니 바로 하향 👉시티는 텐센트 뮤직 엔터테인먼트의 미국 예탁증서(American Depositary Receipts) 목표가를 13달러에서 11.4달러로 인하했습니다.
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @chinastockrestaurant8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 467,512 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“중국주식반점(饭店)” (@chinastockrestaurant8), 4,768 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chinastockrestaurant8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.