Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “✔ فلسفه اخلاق” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net +177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,238–7,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 19:29
7,467
-5
7 Nov 2026, 10:16
7,472
+8
4 Nov 2026, 10:18
7,464
+27
1 Nov 2026, 09:56
7,437
-8
29 Oct 2026, 12:41
7,445
-4
26 Oct 2026, 20:26
7,449
-4
23 Oct 2026, 14:57
7,453
-8
20 Oct 2026, 10:47
7,461
-14
17 Oct 2026, 17:30
7,475
+9
14 Oct 2026, 21:15
7,466
+43
11 Oct 2026, 15:56
7,423
-13
5 Oct 2026, 04:21
7,436
+11
26 Sept 2026, 22:59
7,425
-33
17 Sept 2026, 21:00
7,458
-5
13 Sept 2026, 07:15
7,463
+40
9 Sept 2026, 16:56
7,423
+31
4 Sept 2026, 05:37
7,392
+79
28 Aug 2026, 14:16
7,313
+1
25 Aug 2026, 05:47
7,312
+16
22 Aug 2026, 06:38
7,296
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 7,467 subscribers
Avg views / post
917
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
38 (9 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
9,173
Reactions total
156
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 02:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,450
Videos
≈1,390
Links
≈1,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
35m 48s
Average length
17m 54s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
585 reactions across 35 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
369
63.1%
👏
138
23.6%
👍
49
8.38%
🔥
10
1.71%
💯
6
1.03%
👌
4
0.684%
🕊
3
0.513%
🙏
2
0.342%
✍
1
0.171%
😢
1
0.171%
🤩
1
0.171%
🥰
1
0.171%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 585 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📍بازجویی از خود
(اگر دیگر نتوانیم پشت جوابهای آماده پنهان شویم، چه حقیقتی از ما آشکار میشود؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 گاهی یک سؤال ساده بیشتر از یک ساعت حرف زدن آدم را به فکر فرو میبرد؛ نه چون جوابش دشوار است، چون جوابش را میدانیم و مدتهاست دورش میچرخیم. پنج پرسش در فضای مجازی به کارل یونگ نسبت داده شدهاند؛ درباره ترس، اجتناب، شکست، محیط اطراف و تصویری که از خودمان ساختهایم. نمیتوان با اطمینان گفت اینها پرسشه…
#موسیقی #عاشقانه
🔻اگر روزی جهان از مدار آرامشش بیرون بیفتد، شهرها خاموش شوند و آسمان از دودِ اتفاقها تیره شود، من باز هم از میان تمام ویرانیها راهی به سمت تو پیدا میکنم. تو از آن اتفاقهایی هستی که اگر هزار بار دیگر متولد شوم، دلم میخواهد در هر بار، دوباره پیدایت کنم؛ حتی اگر رسیدن به تو، تنها مسیرِ گمشدنِ شیرین من باشد.
من تو را فقط در بهارهای زندگیام نمیخواهم؛ دلم میخواهد در پاییزهای بیبرگ، زمستانهای بی…
📍 ریشههای جهنمی
(اگر آدم خوبی هستیم، چرا از بعضی آدمها اینقدر بدمان میآید؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 چند وقت پیش توی یک جمع کاری، یکی از دوستان تعریف میکرد که همکارش چطور زیرآب یکی دیگر را زده و موقعیت شغلیاش را به خطر انداخته است. از آن داستانهایی که آدم وسط شنیدنش دلش میخواهد طرف را بگیرد و ببرد وسط میدان شهر و با بلندگو اعلام کند که این موجود دوپا، در واقع یک کفتار با لباس اداری است. من هم نشسته بودم و با حرار…
📍رفاقت و شراکت؛ دو قانون متفاوت
(آیا میتوان همزمان رفیق و شریک یکدیگر بود؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 رفاقت از کجا شروع میشود؟
به نظرم رفاقت و شراکت، با وجود شباهت ظاهریشان، از دو منطق متفاوت پیروی میکنند. در رفاقت، آدمها یکدیگر را به خاطر خودشان میخواهند؛ به خاطر حضورشان، خاطرات مشترکشان و احساسی که از کنار هم بودن دارند. رفاقت قرار نیست همیشه سودآور باشد. گاهی یکی بیشتر میدهد و دیگری بیشتر میگیرد، اما این نابرا…
📍 هیولای قصهی دیگری
(چرا اصرار داریم در داستان زندگی همه، آدم خوبی باشیم؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 هرکدام از ما در داستان زندگی یک نفر، ممکن است هیولا باشیم. شاید در خاطرهی کسی، همان آدمی باشیم که ترکش کرده؛ شاید دوستی که ناگهان سرد شده، یا کسی که باعث شده یک نفر ساعت سه صبح، روی زمین اتاقش بنشیند و گریه کند. ممکن است قصد آزار نداشته باشیم و از نگاه خودمان، تلاشمان را کرده باشیم. آنها ما را از میان تجربهها و زخمهای…
🔆سوگ در مرزِ درد، وجدان و حیرت
خوانشی روانشناختی ـ وجودی از تجربه فقدان
با تأملی بر آرای #نیما_قربانی ، #مصطفی_ملکیان و #آذرخش_مکری
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
سوگ، غالباً بهمثابه واکنشی عاطفی به مرگ و فقدان تعریف میشود؛ گویی مسئله اصلی فرد سوگوار، تحمل اندوه ناشی از نبودن دیگری و سازگار شدن تدریجی با واقعیت فقدان است؛ با این حال، تجربه زیسته سوگ نشان میدهد که آنچه پس از مرگ یک عزیز رخ میدهد، به «غمِ نبودن» محدود نیست. …
📍 هنرِ زمین خوردن
(چرا کودکان باید با مشقت بزرگ شوند، نه با درد و رنج؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 بعضی پدر و مادرها دلشان میخواهد فرزندشان هیچوقت سختی نکشد. پیش از آنکه زمین بخورد، دستش را میگیرند؛ پیش از آنکه اشتباه کند، راه درست را نشانش میدهند و پیش از آنکه با مشکلی روبهرو شود، خودشان آن را حل میکنند. در مقابل، والدینی هم هستند که میگویند: «بگذار سختی بکشد تا قوی شود.» انگار میان این دو راه، انتخاب دیگری وجود ند…
📍از نقش تا خود
(چرا گاهی همه از ما راضیاند، جز خودمان؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 تا حالا شده کسی از شما بپرسد چه میخواهید و قبل از فکرکردن، جوابی بدهید که طرف مقابل را خوشحال میکند؟ مادرتان میپرسد چرا فلان رشته را انتخاب نمیکنی، پدرتان نگران آیندهی شغلیتان است یا دوستی میگوید اگر جای تو بودم، چنین تصمیمی نمیگرفتم. شما میگویید: «آره، شاید حق با تو باشه.» بحث تمام میشود، همه راضیاند و زندگی ادامه پیدا میکند. ف…
📍 لایه ۰۳ | نبضِ پنهانِ کلمات؛ چگونه به متنِ مُرده جان بدهیم؟
(چرا بعضی داستانها نفس میکشند و بعضی دیگر، با تمام زیباییشان، جنازهای از کلماتاند؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 بعضی متنها را میخوانی و هیچ اتفاقی درونت نمیافتد. جملهها درستاند، واژهها زیبا هستند، توصیفها سر جای خودشان نشستهاند؛ اما چیزی کم است. انگار وارد خانهای شدهای که تمام وسایلش مرتباند، ولی کسی در آن زندگی نمیکند. در مقابل، گاهی داستانی با …
📍در ستایش انتظار
(شاید آنچه ما را میسازد، همان چیزی باشد که هنوز به دستش نیاوردهایم؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 پروست جایی از زمان حرف میزند که دیگر شبیه یک خط مستقیم نیست؛ زمانی که در حافظه، حس و تجربهی انسان شکل دیگری پیدا میکند. انتظار هم چنین کیفیتی دارد. یک اتفاق هنوز نیفتاده، اما فضای زندگی را پر کرده است. صدای پیام نیامده، پشت درِ خانهای که هنوز باز نشده، نتیجهای که هنوز اعلام نشده؛ گاهی یک «هنوز» کوچک میتو…
📍در ستایش باخت
(اگر قرار باشد گاهی ببازیم، چرا اینهمه برای برنده ماندن زندگی میکنیم؟)
✍️ #مصطفی_سلیمانی
🔻 ما از کودکی جدول عجیبی جلوی چشممان گذاشتهاند: نمره بیشتر، رتبه بهتر، دانشگاه بهتر، شغل بهتر، خانه بهتر، درآمد بیشتر. کمکم یاد گرفتهایم زندگی را با خطکش نتیجه اندازه بگیریم. کسی که جلوتر است، موفقتر به نظر میرسد و کسی که عقب افتاده، باید توضیحی برای عقبماندنش داشته باشد. انگار زندگی مسابقهای است که هرکس…
👏22❤13🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @filsofak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @filsofak as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
44 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@filsofak named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@advertis_manager named in 2 posts, 4 November 2026 – 5 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مصطفی ملکیان @mostafamalekian · 65,810 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
آخرین خبر فوری/مذاکره/جنگ/اسرائیل @newskhabar_ir · 70,522 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 August 2026
بانک کتاب صوتی @soutidastan · 95,168 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
دکتر شیری @drshiri · 97,091 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
شبکه توسعه @I_D_Network · 38,563 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Sherwin Vakili (شروین وکیلی) @sherwin_vakili · 22,219 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فلسفه اخلاق | مصطفی سلیمانی” (@filsofak), 7,467 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filsofak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
