Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 98 days, net +396. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,726–11,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 21:49
11,194
+1
10 Nov 2026, 00:16
11,193
+2
8 Nov 2026, 16:10
11,191
+2
7 Nov 2026, 06:11
11,189
-2
6 Nov 2026, 07:10
11,191
+6
5 Nov 2026, 10:06
11,185
+2
4 Nov 2026, 10:26
11,183
+7
3 Nov 2026, 10:56
11,176
+2
2 Nov 2026, 07:59
11,174
-1
1 Nov 2026, 06:24
11,175
-8
31 Oct 2026, 08:30
11,183
+6
29 Oct 2026, 06:41
11,177
+9
28 Oct 2026, 01:46
11,168
+3
26 Oct 2026, 23:47
11,165
+3
25 Oct 2026, 23:29
11,162
+6
24 Oct 2026, 20:37
11,156
+3
24 Oct 2026, 00:06
11,153
-3
22 Oct 2026, 23:50
11,156
+6
22 Oct 2026, 00:49
11,150
-1
20 Oct 2026, 16:41
11,151
first reading
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 11,194 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.588%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
100 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
68,831
Reactions total
405
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 22:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,570
Videos
≈255
Links
≈3,870
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 36s
Average length
5m 36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
909 reactions across 96 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
637
70.1%
👍
111
12.2%
👎
75
8.25%
👏
19
2.09%
🔥
15
1.65%
😐
9
0.99%
❤🔥
8
0.88%
💔
7
0.77%
😁
7
0.77%
👌
6
0.66%
🕊
4
0.44%
😎
4
0.44%
🤔
4
0.44%
🙉
2
0.22%
😍
1
0.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 909 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 22 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (55.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
منتشر شد
راهنمای دانشجویان برای «بردارها و تانسورها»
دانیل فلایش
ترجمهٔ بهنام شیخ باقری
قوانین متریک با استفاده از تانسورها توصیف میشوند، بنابراین، نظریۀ نسبیت عام بر پایۀ فرمولبندی تانسوری قوانین فیزیکی و مفاهیمی چون تانسور متریک، نمادهای کریستوفل، و مشتقات هموردا استوار است. تانسور انحنای ریمان مهمترین تانسور در نسبیت عام است، که گاهی به افتخار ریاضیدانان قرن نوزدهمی آلمان به نامهای برنهارد ریمان و الوین برو…
به هر روی مهم است در ذهن داشته باشیم که از نظر کانت، انگیزۀ عمل انسان در هر لحظۀ معیّن هر چه باشد، انسانها همیشه به دلیلی دست به عمل میزنند. همواره انگیزهای وجود دارد که سرچشمۀ عمل را فراهم میکند. این سخن که انسانها همیشه به دلیلی دست به عمل میزنند به این معناست که انسانها همیشه بنا بر اصول یا آنچه کانت ضوابط مینامد عمل میکنند. کانت ضابطه را اینگونه تعریف میکند: «قاعدهای که خودِ قوۀ انتخاب برای اِعمال …
به گواه تاریخنامههای دوران سلطنت شاه عباس، قهوهخانهها بخشی از برنامۀ ساختوسازِ چهارباغ، گردشگاه معروف اصفهان، بودند. میرزا بیگ جُنابدی در کتاب روضة الصفویه گزارش میدهد که «میخانهها و قهوهخانهها جهت معاشران میخواره و افیونیان بیسرمایه در آن خیابان مهیا بود». در روایت جلالالدین منجم یزدی از احداث چهارباغ نیز به قهوهخانهها اشاره شده است. طبق گزارش وی، شاه عباس در دوازدهم رجب ۱۰۱۱ق/۲۶ دسامبر ۱۶۰۲م، پس از اتم…
منتشر شد
تاریخ روزنامهنگاری در قلمرو زبان فارسی (دوره پنج جلدی)
ناصرالدین پروین
نخستین جرقههای روزنامهنگاری فارسی در حدود سال ۹۷۰ خورشیدی با انتشار خبرنامههای دستنویس دربار اکبرشاه گورکانی در هند زده شد، خبرنامههایی که در صدها نسخه به سراسر امپراتوری فرستاده میشدند و چند قرن دوام یافتند. در زمستان ۱۱۵۸ خورشیدی، زبان فارسی بار دیگر در هند به عرصه روزنامههای چاپی راه یافت و شصت سال دوام آورد، بی آنکه هیچ ف…
🔸 منتشر شد
مجلد نخست از تاریخ روزنامهنگاری در قلمرو زبان فارسی مربوط به ۱۱۶ سال نخست این مسیر است و دوره پادشاهی محمدشاه و ناصرالدینشاه قاجار را در بر میگیرد.
مجلد دوم تاریخ روزنامهنگاری در قلمرو زبان فارسی مربوط به دورۀ مذکور است. در این دوره، دستکم ۲۰۸ عنوان روزنامه و مجله به زبان فارسی منتشر شد و فقط هشت نشریه فارسیزبان بیرون از ایران فعالیت داشتند.
مجلد سوم تاریخ روزنامهنگاری در قلمرو زبان فارسی مر…
چينىها بهگونهاى مرموز از باران مىترسند؛ بارها در تاريخشان آمده است كه بهعلت بارش باران از جنگ دست كشيدند، يا اگر باران نباريده بود كشتارى بس بيشتر كرده بودند. چينىها معتقدند كه وقتى باران مىبارد، آسمان و زمين با هم آميزش مىكنند؛ عنصر نرينه جهان، يانگ، و مادينه، يين، جفت مىشوند و بىحرمتى است كه كسى بيرون رود و ميان اين دو قرار گيرد.
زندگى روزانه چينى شكنجهاى عينى است، زيرا احساس مىكند كه نيروهاى نادي…
یکی از موضوعاتی که مشخصۀ دوران مغول و، تا حدی، قرن متعاقب تیموری است توجه بیشتر به زنان است، به این معنا که زنان طبقۀ نخبه نهتنها در امور سیاسی و اقتصادی بلکه در اواخر این دوران در حمایت از فعالیتهای فرهنگی نیز آزادی عمل دارند. در تصاویر دیتس و انجامۀ شاهنامهای از دورۀ ایلخانی، بر قابلرؤیت بودن زنان و اهمیت آنان در فضای مغولی صحه میگذارند. مجموعهای از تصاویر کوچک از زوجهای نشسته بر تخت که طبق اشارۀ رشیدالدین و…
در دست انتشار
«دری از پس دری دیگر»
رمان؛ ادبیات آمریکا
جسی بال
ترجمهٔ اسد ناصحی
جسی بال از آن دست نویسندگانی به شمار میرود که باب دندان اهل قلم است. ولی با ذهنیتی پذیرا، هر خوانندهای از گیرایی روایت بازیگوشانه او لذت خواهد برد. این قصه قصه جوان گوشهگیریست که عشق نویافته خود را گم کرده و میخواهد هر طور شده دوباره پیدایش کند؛ حتی شده به زورِ دست بردن در روایت خود قصه.
از مقدمهٔ مترجم
«لورن داریوس! خوب تو را م…
چاپ بیستویکم منتشر شد
ویراست سوم
«تاریخ عقاید اقتصادی»
از افلاطون تا دورهی معاصر
از ۶۰۰ قبل از میلاد تا ۲۰۰۰ میلادی
فریدون تفضلی
دانش اقتصاد ساخته و پرداختهی اندیشهی بزرگانی است که سالیان پیوسته در این زمینه کوشیدهاند. لیکن هر اندیشهی اقتصادی تحت تأثیر محیط اجتماعی، زمان، سیاست، فلسفه و مشرب اقتصاددانان قرار گرفته و میدان را به پیدایش نظریهی مخالف یا گشایش راه تکامل یا عقیدهای تازه در سطحی برتر و جامعتر …
بعضی افراد موفقیت را وسیلهای میدانند برای پیشیگرفتن کینهتوزانه و انتقامجویانه از دیگران؛ میترسند دیگران از انگیزهی آنان باخبر شوند و وقتی موفقیت زیادی بزرگ شد، از آنها انتقام بگیرند. فروید معتقد بود این مسئله با ترس از پیشی گرفتن از پدر و در نتیجه قرار گرفتن در معرض خطر اختگی مرتبط است.
فردی که در زندگی غوطهور میشود، محکوم به اضطراب است. قدبرافراشتن و گذشتن از طبیعت، پدرِ خود شدن یا بهاصطلاح اسپینوزا «خ…
👍7🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @neypub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@neypub edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 November 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @neypub as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
رسانه، فرهنگ - نشانه @irCDS · 19,502 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
باشگاه ادبیات @BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,714 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
انبارستان🎧 @anbar100 · 29,569 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
سرای دانایی @llib7 · 26,346 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Aasoo - آسو @NashrAasoo · 29,061 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
ART CHANNEL @artchanel · 20,173 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026
جامعهشناسی @iransociology · 37,367 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
📖📚 شیفتگان کتــــــاب 📚📖 @shifteganketab · 85,333 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
Classical Music @classicmusic3 · 40,965 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
کتاب خانه جامع 📚 @KetabTOpdf · 63,706 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
کتابخانه @bookhapdf · 75,502 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@litera999کتابخانهوموزه @litera999 · 78,212 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
شفیعی کدکنی @shafiei_kadkani · 44,376 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
وبسایت فرهنگی صدانت @Sedanet · 21,511 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
کتوزیست ketozist @ketozist · 44,205 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 September 2026
نطقیات @nutqiyyat · 30,709 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Biijame @biijameart · 33,920 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
مصطفی ملکیان @mostafamalekian · 65,810 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
صدای دانشجویان دانشگاه تبریز❤ @sedayedaneshjoyan · 17,528 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
سخنرانیها @sokhanranihaa · 132,182 Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نشر نی” (@neypub), 11,194 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neypub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.