Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mohammad-Tabibian

@MohammadTabibian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,915subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001147807561
TypeChannel
Username@MohammadTabibian
Created7 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MohammadTabibian

Growth

5,9135,9155,9146 August 2026 — 5,915 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,915 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,913 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,915 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,913–5,915 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:335,915+2
9 Aug 2026, 07:125,913-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:315,915no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:045,915first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.3%
avg views ÷ 5,915 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,620
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held26 (28 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total36,693
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 41s
Average length
3m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC740 viewsread 12 August 2026

توضیح بالای مطلب از آقای دکتر قوچانی است.

11 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC782 viewsread 12 August 2026

این گزارش مستدل و متین آقای قوچانی گرانقدر را، که در بالا اشاره شد، اگر فرصت مطالعه دست یافت بی نقص خواهید یافت. چون برای هر نکته ماخذ و منبع معمولا از گفته های خود عبدالکریم سروش داده شده است. اما جواب آقای سروش!! دریغ از یک خط و یک جمله مستدل در توضیح و نقد و رد مطالب. این بار هم زبان به ناسزای ادبی و هتاکی گشوده‌اند. این خود ظرفیت فکری و روشنفکری کسی را نشان‌می‌دهد که عامل عمده آن به اصطلاح انقلاب فرهنگی و ‘پاک سا

8 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 12 August 2026

شماره ۶۴۲ مجله تجارت فردا منتشر شد. طبق معمول مجموعه ای نفیس و بدیع از مطالب روز آمد، آموزنده و مفید. از جمله مطلبی از اندیشمند گرانقدر دکتر محمد قوچانی، تحت عنوان لیبرالیزم نقابدار. آنچه من سعی کردم برای آگاهی جوانان در چند پاراگراف و زبان نارسا بنویسم ایشان به تفصیل و مستدل به ماخذ و منابع و مرور تاریخچه ای کامل نگاشته اند. تصویر صفحه اول نوشته ایشان در پایین آمده است.

28 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC≈4,060 viewsread 12 August 2026

دوستی این مطلب را فرستاده اند آقای سروش به دفاع از شریعتی به هتاکی به دکتر غنی نژاد پرداخته. ایشان در نقد آنچه اهانت به شریعتی دانسته اند، باب اهانت را از اول مرقومه خود باز کرده اند. گویی حق اهانت و پرخاش ادیبانه با شعر و جمله پردازی حق ایشان است و لاغیر. ‘ناشسته روی ناسزا گو’. این گرفتاری ما بوده؛ از جانب روشنفکران ایدئولوگ انقلاب. این سطح اندیشه ورزی اما در هتاکی! حقیقتا به سطوح عالی دست یافته اند.

28 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC≈6,560 viewsread 12 August 2026

جنجال دربارهٔ ماجرای «پروفسور شندل» و نسبت آن با شیادی فکری اخیراً دکتر موسی غنی‌نژاد در یک گفت‌وگو اشاره کرده‌اند که دکتر علی شریعتی در برخی نوشته‌های خود از شخصی به نام «پروفسور شندل» به‌عنوان منبع استفاده کرده، در حالی که چنین فردی وجود خارجی ندارد. بعدها پژوهشگران نشان دادند که «chandelle» در واقع نام مستعاری بوده که شریعتی برای ارجاع دادن به خود یا برای ایجاد اتوریتهٔ علمی ساختگی به کار می‌برد؛ و حتی در برخی مو

24 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTC≈3,150 viewsread 12 August 2026

استاد ارجمند دکتر عبده تبریزی تکمله قابل ملاحظه ای بر مطلب فوق نوشته اند، با تشکر از ایشان؛ *استاد محترم، جناب آقای دکتر محمد طبیبیان* با عرض سلام درست می‌فرمایید که پایان واقعی جنگ، حتی با خاموش شدن سلاح‌ها هم واقعیت نمی‌یابد؛ زمانی نمایان می‌شود که امکان آشتی، بازسازی نهادها، احیای اعتماد اجتماعی و بازگشت به مسیر توسعه فراهم شود. اگر این مرحله محقق نشود، جنگ حتی پس از پایان درگیری نظامی نیز، در اشکال دیگر، سال‌ه

24 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC≈4,050 viewsread 12 August 2026

عاقبت جنگ برای بسیاری این پرسش مطرح می شود که عاقبت این جنگ در صورت تداوم چگونه است؟ پیش‌بینی آینده دشوار است، اما بررسی روندهای تاریخی می‌تواند تصویر روشنی از پیامدهای جنگ ارائه دهد. پس از جنگ جهانی دوم، ایالات متحده در مجموعه‌ای از جنگ‌ها و مداخلات نظامی حضور داشته است؛ برخی با پیروزی نظامی جزیی و کوتاه‌مدت، و بسیاری با ناکامی در دستیابی به اهداف سیاسی بلندمدت. یعنی ناکامی در دست‌یابی به هر هدفی که بتوان پیروزی نا

21 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC≈2,560 viewsread 12 August 2026

تابلو نقاشی پیروزی مرگ اثر Pieter Bruege نقاشی سال ۱۵۶۲. این تصور عده‌ای از غایت موفقیت است.

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @MohammadTabibian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 710,136 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mohammad-Tabibian” (@MohammadTabibian), 5,915 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MohammadTabibian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.