توضیح بالای مطلب از آقای دکتر قوچانی است.

Channel
Mohammad-Tabibian
@MohammadTabibian
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,915subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001147807561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MohammadTabibian |
| Created | 7 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MohammadTabibian |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 5,915 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 5,913 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 5,915 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 5,915 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 44.3%
- avg views ÷ 5,915 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,620
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (28 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,693 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 41s
- Average length
- 3m 41s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
این گزارش مستدل و متین آقای قوچانی گرانقدر را، که در بالا اشاره شد، اگر فرصت مطالعه دست یافت بی نقص خواهید یافت. چون برای هر نکته ماخذ و منبع معمولا از گفته های خود عبدالکریم سروش داده شده است. اما جواب آقای سروش!! دریغ از یک خط و یک جمله مستدل در توضیح و نقد و رد مطالب. این بار هم زبان به ناسزای ادبی و هتاکی گشودهاند. این خود ظرفیت فکری و روشنفکری کسی را نشانمیدهد که عامل عمده آن به اصطلاح انقلاب فرهنگی و ‘پاک سا…
Photo, posted without a caption
شماره ۶۴۲ مجله تجارت فردا منتشر شد. طبق معمول مجموعه ای نفیس و بدیع از مطالب روز آمد، آموزنده و مفید. از جمله مطلبی از اندیشمند گرانقدر دکتر محمد قوچانی، تحت عنوان لیبرالیزم نقابدار. آنچه من سعی کردم برای آگاهی جوانان در چند پاراگراف و زبان نارسا بنویسم ایشان به تفصیل و مستدل به ماخذ و منابع و مرور تاریخچه ای کامل نگاشته اند. تصویر صفحه اول نوشته ایشان در پایین آمده است.
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
دوستی این مطلب را فرستاده اند آقای سروش به دفاع از شریعتی به هتاکی به دکتر غنی نژاد پرداخته. ایشان در نقد آنچه اهانت به شریعتی دانسته اند، باب اهانت را از اول مرقومه خود باز کرده اند. گویی حق اهانت و پرخاش ادیبانه با شعر و جمله پردازی حق ایشان است و لاغیر. ‘ناشسته روی ناسزا گو’. این گرفتاری ما بوده؛ از جانب روشنفکران ایدئولوگ انقلاب. این سطح اندیشه ورزی اما در هتاکی! حقیقتا به سطوح عالی دست یافته اند.
جنجال دربارهٔ ماجرای «پروفسور شندل» و نسبت آن با شیادی فکری اخیراً دکتر موسی غنینژاد در یک گفتوگو اشاره کردهاند که دکتر علی شریعتی در برخی نوشتههای خود از شخصی به نام «پروفسور شندل» بهعنوان منبع استفاده کرده، در حالی که چنین فردی وجود خارجی ندارد. بعدها پژوهشگران نشان دادند که «chandelle» در واقع نام مستعاری بوده که شریعتی برای ارجاع دادن به خود یا برای ایجاد اتوریتهٔ علمی ساختگی به کار میبرد؛ و حتی در برخی مو…
استاد ارجمند دکتر عبده تبریزی تکمله قابل ملاحظه ای بر مطلب فوق نوشته اند، با تشکر از ایشان؛ *استاد محترم، جناب آقای دکتر محمد طبیبیان* با عرض سلام درست میفرمایید که پایان واقعی جنگ، حتی با خاموش شدن سلاحها هم واقعیت نمییابد؛ زمانی نمایان میشود که امکان آشتی، بازسازی نهادها، احیای اعتماد اجتماعی و بازگشت به مسیر توسعه فراهم شود. اگر این مرحله محقق نشود، جنگ حتی پس از پایان درگیری نظامی نیز، در اشکال دیگر، ساله…
عاقبت جنگ برای بسیاری این پرسش مطرح می شود که عاقبت این جنگ در صورت تداوم چگونه است؟ پیشبینی آینده دشوار است، اما بررسی روندهای تاریخی میتواند تصویر روشنی از پیامدهای جنگ ارائه دهد. پس از جنگ جهانی دوم، ایالات متحده در مجموعهای از جنگها و مداخلات نظامی حضور داشته است؛ برخی با پیروزی نظامی جزیی و کوتاهمدت، و بسیاری با ناکامی در دستیابی به اهداف سیاسی بلندمدت. یعنی ناکامی در دستیابی به هر هدفی که بتوان پیروزی نا…
تابلو نقاشی پیروزی مرگ اثر Pieter Bruege نقاشی سال ۱۵۶۲. این تصور عدهای از غایت موفقیت است.
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @MohammadTabibian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 710,136 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mohammad-Tabibian” (@MohammadTabibian), 5,915 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MohammadTabibian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.