مدرسانۀ دورنما pinned a video

Channel
مدرسانۀ دورنما
@doornamaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,342subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001240263248 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doornamaa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doornamaa |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 5,342 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 5,341 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 5,338 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 5,339 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 34.8%
- avg views ÷ 5,342 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,860
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.36%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (21 December 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,140 |
| Reactions total | 152 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 31s
- Average length
- 2m 30s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 213 | 99.1% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.93% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#راوی #باز_نشر 🔹قسمت هشتم پادکست راوی، که سال گذشته در ایام اربعین منتشر شد، گزارش مقالهای بود از آنتوان بورو، که در آن به حضور واقعۀ کربلا در حافظه و خاطرۀ جمعی مسلمانان پرداخته است. بریدۀ کوتاه بالا ـ که برای این بازنشر انتخاب شده ـ به تحلیل دلایل سکوت منابع غیراسلامی در برابر این واقعه اختصاص دارد. 🔻توضیحات بیشتر را اینجا بخوانید. 🔻فایل مقالۀ اصلی را از اینجا بردارید. 🔻پادکست را از اینجاها بشنوید: تلگ…
👍16
مدرسانۀ دورنما pinned a video
۱. مقالهٔ فرد دانر در مرور بر کتاب «هاجریه» اثر کرون و کوک @doornamaa
👍22
#عطف (۲) #منابع_پادکست 🔹منابع اصلی قسمت دوم عطف ▫️Wansbrough, John E. Qur'anic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. ▫️Crone, Patricia, and Michael Cook. Hagarism: The making of the Islamic world. Cambridge University Press, 1977. ▫️Shoemaker, Stephen J. Creating the Qur’an. A Historical Critical Study. University of California Press, 2022. 🔹منابع استف…
👍10
#عطف (۲) #پادکست 🔅رادیو دورنما عطف ـ قسمت دوم 🔹«تجدیدنظرطلبی» در تاریخ قرآن؛ از ونسبرا تا شومیکر کاری از #فاطمه_مصلحزاده 🔺عطف را در کستباکس و شنوتو و سایر پادگیرها هم میتوان شنید. 🔻پادکست عطف در یوتوب و آپارات نیز در دسترس است. #تجدیدنظرطلبی #جان_ونسبرا #پاتریشیا_کرون #مایکل_کوک #استیون_شومیکر #مطالعات_قرآن_در_غرب #اسلام_پژوهی_غربیان #دورنما_بشنویم #رادیو_دورنما @doornamaa
👍26
#عطف (۲) #بریدۀ_پادکست #کاور_پادکست ▪️«تجدیدنظرطلبی» در تاریخ قرآن از ونسبرا تا شومیکر 🔹دومین شمارۀ پادکست عطف به معرفی و تحلیل رویکردهای جریان موسوم به «تجدیدنظرطلبی» در مطالعات اسلام و قرآن اختصاص دارد، جریانی که با آثار مهم جان ونسبرا ایجاد شد؛ با نوشتههای کسانی چون اندرو ریپین، پاتریشیا کرون و مایکل کوک به اوج رسید؛ و در سالهای اخیر با پژوهشهای محققانی چون استیون شومیکر ادامه یافت. در ادامۀ نخستین شما…
👍16
#آغاز_دوباره ▪️سالی که گذشت سال بد بود … 🔹ما روزهای بد دیده بودیم، هفتههای بد، حتی ماههای سخت و غمانگیز هم تجربه کرده بودیم؛ ما آدم روزهای سخت بودیم، اما آنقدر که در این یک سال زخم نشست بر جانمان، بر تن ایرانمان، را هرگز ندیده بودیم. در این یک سال، جانی نبود برای گفتنِ حرفی، سکوت بود فقط. سال بد بود … 🔹اما از پسِ این یک سال هم جهان ادامه دارد. معلوممان نیست کِی و چهطور دوباره روزهای معمولی را زندگی خواهیم …
👍60👎2
مدرسانۀ دورنما pinned a photo
▪️خوانش آثار ایرانی-اسلامی 🔹در طی بیش از ده سال گذشته، زیر عنوان کلیِ «متنخوانی آثار کلاسیک تفسیر و علوم قرآن» ده دورۀ آموزشی برگزار کردهام و به برخی تألیفات مشهور و شناختهشده در حوزۀ قرآنشناسی در سدههای گذشته پرداختهام. متنهای برگزیدۀ دو دورۀ اخیر، که پاییز و زمستان پارسال برگزار شدند، تفسیرهای کهن فارسی بودند و دربارۀ دلیل انتخاب آن متنها همانجا نوشتم که مدتی است دلمشغولِ «تاریخ تحولات دین و اندیشۀ دینی …
👍11
▪️سیری در آثار راغب اصفهانی با تدریس #مهرداد_عباسی 🔹دورۀ هفتجلسهایِ آنلاین 🔹یکشنبهها شش بعدازظهر، از چهاردهم دی 🔹با امکان دسترسی به فایل صوتی جلسهها 🔹ثبتنام با ارسال پیام به ۰۹۱۲۵۰۲۰۸۲۴ #دورۀ_آموزشی #متن_خوانی #راغب_خوانی #راغب_اصفهانی #خوانش_آثار_ایرانی_اسلامی @drmehrdadabbasi
👍5
▪️وصف دورنما در قم 🔹بههمت مرکز مطالعات قرآن دانشگاه مفید، صبح یکشنبه هفتم دیماه جلسهای برپا خواهد بود برای معرفی مدرسانۀ دورنما. اکنون که با لطف و مشارکت همکاران عزیز و همراهان گرانقدر، دورنما وارد هفتمین سال فعالیت خود شده، مجال مناسبی است تا در حلقهای دانشگاهی، از برنامههای سابق و لاحق دورنما بگویم. از دکتر حامد شیواپور (مدیر مرکز)، که ایدۀ برگزاری این جلسه به پیشنهاد و دعوت او شکل گرفت، بسیار سپاسگزارم.…
👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @doornamaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 54,931 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مدرسانۀ دورنما” (@doornamaa), 5,342 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doornamaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.