Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سروش دباغ

Channel

سروش دباغ

@Soroushdabbagh_Official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,901subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001054157233
TypeChannel
Username@Soroushdabbagh_Official
Created28 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Soroushdabbagh_Official

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,83711,97511,90611,9015 August 202612 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 98 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,816–11,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 06:5111,901-2
10 Nov 2026, 06:3111,903+3
8 Nov 2026, 21:5411,900-1
7 Nov 2026, 13:0611,901+1
6 Nov 2026, 12:2611,900+8
5 Nov 2026, 11:1711,892-4
4 Nov 2026, 14:1411,896+2
3 Nov 2026, 17:3911,894+4
1 Nov 2026, 21:3611,890-3
31 Oct 2026, 23:1711,893-6
31 Oct 2026, 01:1911,899-3
28 Oct 2026, 22:0511,902-5
27 Oct 2026, 20:4811,907+4
26 Oct 2026, 20:4611,903+1
25 Oct 2026, 23:0711,902+3
25 Oct 2026, 00:1711,899-8
24 Oct 2026, 03:4511,907-3
23 Oct 2026, 01:1811,910-1
20 Oct 2026, 20:0711,911+1
18 Oct 2026, 00:1711,910first reading

Engagement

113 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.66%
avg views ÷ 11,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
50
of 113 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held113 (23 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total51,552
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 12:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,870
Videos
≈259
Links
≈3,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 22s
Average length
1m 27s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (18.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 20:49 UTC544 viewsread 15 November 2026

با توجه به تاملات سروش دباغ که به تطبیق زیست‌ جهان اسپینوزا و سهراب سپهری حول چهار محور «فلسفه‌ورزی» ، «مواجهه با متن مقدس» ، «نیایش» و «شادی درونی» می‌پردازد، می‌توان این پرسش‌های را با وضعیت کنونی و شرایط زیسته مردم ایران پیوند زد: ۱) در باب «پله مذهب و کوچه شک» و بحران ایمان در ایران امروز می توان گفت : سهراب می‌گوید: «رفتم از پله مذهب بالا، تا ته کوچه شک». اسپینوزا هم به خاطر نقدهایش تکفیر شد و از جامعه خود رانده…

14 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC492 viewsread 15 November 2026

. " اسپینوزا و سپهری به روایت سروش دباغ" 🔹علی غلامی من در این جستار سروش دباغ، " از پلهٔ مذهب تا کوچه شک؛زیست جهان‌ اسپینوزا و سپهری"، خوانش تطبیقی بسیار بدیعی از زیست‌جهان باروخ اسپینوزا و سهراب سپهری می‌بینم. او این دو سالک مدرن را در چهار محور فلسفه‌ورزی، مواجهه با متن مقدس، نیایش و شادی درونی کنار هم می‌نشاند و نشان می‌دهد که هر دو از بستر سنتی برخاستند، اما مسیر عبور از مذهب سنتی را طی کردند. سپهری با آن جمل…

14 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC482 viewsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @DidgahenochannelPhoto

درس‌گفتارهای حلقه دیدگاه نو دوره نُهم کتاب “ویتگنشتاین و گادامر” به‌سوی فلسفه پساتحلیلی اثر کریس لان مدرس: سروش دباغ یکشنبه‌ها، ۸ جلسه اولین جلسه؛ ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۲۴، ساعت ۱۹:۳۰ به وقت تهران Nov 15, 2026, 11 AM EST کلاب حلقه دیدگاه نو لینک کلاب هاوس #حلقه_دیدگاه_نو @didgahenochannel

14 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC494 viewsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @theopensocietyFile

✨”در محضر حافظ” جلسه هفتم دکتر سروش دباغ @theopensociety

14 Nov 2026, 16:49 UTC543 viewsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @theopensocietyPhoto

https://t.me/theopensociety?livestream=d56410b07f9c445355 ✨”در محضر حافظ” جلسه هفتم دکتر سروش دباغ بازخوانی هرمنوتیکی دیوان حافظ شنبه ۱۴ نوامبر ساعت ۱۲ ظهر بوقت امریکای شمالی ۸:۳۰ عصر بوقت تهران @theopensociety

14 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC679 viewsread 15 November 2026

. زمزمۀ ۲۰. « قشنگ یعنی چه؟/قشنگ یعنی تعبیر عاشقانۀ اشکال/ و عشق، تنها عشق/ ترا به گرمی یک سیب می کند مانوس/ و عشق، تنها عشق/ مرا به وسعت اندوه زندگی ها برد/ مرا رساند به امکان یک پرنده شدن.» در فقراتی از دفتر «مسافر»، که از جنس گفتگوی اگزیستانسیل و عافیت سوزِ میان مسافر و میزبان است، میزبان از مسافر (سهراب) می پرسد: قشنگ (زیبا) به چه معناست؟ و پاسخ می شنود: قشنگی (زیبایی) با تعبیر و تفسیر عاشقانۀ اشکال و پدیده ها…

12 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC731 viewsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @tahkimmelat

‍ ♦️بیانیه مشترک ۳۰ کنشگر سیاسی و مدنی در ضرورت توقف فوری اعدام ۳۰ کنشگر سیاسی و مدنی با انتشار بیانیه‌ای مشترک، ضمن اعتراض به تشدید اعدام‌های سیاسی و امنیتی در ایران و نقض دادرسی عادلانه، خواستار توقف فوری و بی‌قیدوشرط اعدام‌ها شدند و نسبت به پیامدهای خشونت دولتی بر امنیت و همبستگی ملی هشدار دادند. متن کامل بیانیه به شرح زیر است: با کمال تاسف تا کنون عده‌ای از بازداشت شدگان اعتراضات دی‌ماه ١٤٠٤ اعدام شده‌اند. بیش…

11 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 15 November 2026

. زمزمۀ 19. « زیر باران باید رفت/ فکر را، خاطره را، زیر باران باید برد/ با همۀ مردم شهر، زیر باران باید رفت/ دوست را، زیر باران باید دید/ عشق را، زیر باران باید جست/ زیر باران باید با زن خوابید/ زیر باران باید بازی کرد/ زیر باران باید چیز نوشت، حرف زد، نیلوفر کاشت». روانشناسان و روان درمانگرانِ متعددی در دهه های اخیر، مبتنی بر شواهد علمیِ متقن متذکر شده اند، بکار بستنِ هر یک از حواسِ پنجگانۀ بینایی، شنوایی، لامسه،…

11 Nov 2026, 15:49 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @dinonline

🔻من پر از فانوسم پدیدارشناسی؛ آثار و اندیشه‌های سروش دباغ ✍فرهاد مشکور ✔️ سال‌هاست که در مسیر پژوهش و تأملات فلسفی، نام سروش دباغ را به‌عنوان اندیشمندی در گستره حکمت، فلسفه، عرفان، ادبیات و حالا روانشناسی دنبال می‌کنم. او در طی این سال‌ها نه‌تنها در مقام فیلسوفی جستجوگر بلکه به‌عنوان متفکری با دغدغه‌های اگزیستانسیال، پرسش‌های بنیادین زمانه ما را از زوایای گوناگون کاویده است. اما آنچه بیش از هر چیز برای من جالب‌توجه …

Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @Soroushdabbagh_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Soroushdabbagh_Official edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 14 posts on @Soroushdabbagh_Official as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

وبسایت فرهنگی صدانت
@Sedanet · 21,501
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
📚 کتابخانه نایاب عرفانی نور 📚
@book_noor · 44,686
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
فلسفه اگزیستانسیالیسم و روانکاوی
@phenomenology_existentialism · 19,575
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
مصطفی ملکیان
@mostafamalekian · 65,809
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei
@drsargolzaei · 35,609
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
انبارستان🎧
@anbar100 · 29,863
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
هزار داستان با مسعود بهنود
@hezardastanbehnood · 44,125
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سروش دباغ” (@Soroushdabbagh_Official), 11,901 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Soroushdabbagh_Official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.