4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,084–5,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 22:26
5,085
-5
10 Aug 2026, 01:41
5,090
+5
7 Aug 2026, 03:38
5,085
-2
6 Aug 2026, 13:34
5,087
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 5,085 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
21 (21 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
12,086
Reactions total
183
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
230 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
88
38.3%
👍
76
33.0%
👎
28
12.2%
👏
12
5.22%
👌
6
2.61%
🙏
6
2.61%
🤣
5
2.17%
🤔
4
1.74%
🥴
4
1.74%
😁
1
0.435%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔻فلسفهورزی بدون درگیر شدن با تاریخ (ــِ فلسفه) ما را گرفتار «اکنونزدگی» (Presentism) میکند؛ انگار که میتوان چرخ حل مسأله را از نو اختراع کرد. در نقطهی مقابل، «تاریخزدگی» (Antiquarianism) هم موجب میشود که چشمهی خلاقیت بخشکد و فلسفهورزی به سرایداری میراث فیلسوفان مُرده بدل شود. بر این اساس، فلسفهورزی نه نادیده گرفتن تاریخ است و نه تسلیم محض شدن در برابر آن؛ فلسفهورزی درگیریِ فیلسوفانه با تاریخ است. 🔴 @YMirda…
👆ارجاعاتِ فرستهی قبل
ــــــ
[1]. چنانکه گفتیم متون فقهی و عقیدتی در این باره بسیار است. برای مطالعهی بیشتر میتوان به این اثر مراجعه کرد: عبد الله بن عبد الحميد الأثري، الوجيز في عقيدة السلف الصالح، ص173ـ186، السعودية: وزارة الشؤون الإسلامية. و یا برای مطالعهی تفصیلی دیدگاههای ابن تیمیه در این باب نک: السمهوری، نقد گفتمان سلفی: مورد ابن تیمیه، ص129ـ228، ترجمه و حواشی: عدنان فلاحی، لندن: نشر نوگام، 2026.
[2]. الش…
☪️اسلامی که لیبرال شد: مورد فقه و بدعتگزاران (دگراندیشان)
یکی از مدعیات اخیر د. عبدالکریم سروش آن است که «اسلام لیبرال نداریم». اگر مقصود از این سخن آن باشد که لیبرالیسم به عنوان یک مکتب فلسفی، از درون منابع نخستین اسلام استخراج نمیشود، این ادعا قابل بحث است. اما اگر مقصود آن باشد که لیبرالیسم هیچ تأثیری بر فهم و صورتبندی گفتمان معاصر اسلامی نگذاشته است، شواهد قطعی تاریخی خلاف آن را نشان میدهد.
باب «أهل الأ…
🔰گفتوگو با یاسر میردامادی در باب کتاب «گفتوگو؛ آیین حقجویی»؛
در جستوجوی سنت گمشده گفتوگو
🔸حقایقی که بر زبان نیایند زهرآگین میشوند
یاسر میردامادی گفت:جامعهای که در بحرانها همه پلهای گفتوگو را پشت سر خود ویران کند توان خروج از بحران را نیز از دست خواهد داد. گفتوگو تضمین نمیکند که همهی اختلافها از میان بروند اما این امکان را فراهم میسازد که انسانها دوباره یکدیگر را نه صرفاً به عنوان «موضعِ رقیب» بلک…
📝📝📝برافراشتنِ گفتوگو در عصرِ «غلبهیِ جدل»
🔺نگاهی به کتاب «گفتوگو، آیین حقجویی، درآمدی بومی به گفتوگوشناسی»
✍️یاسر میردامادی
کتاب «گفتوگو، آیین حقجویی، درآمدی بومی به گفتوگوشناسی» را از آن رو نوشتم که پرسشی ذهن مرا به خود مشغول کرده بود سالها، پرسشی که بیش از هر کجا در شبکههای اجتماعی فارسی، بهویژه کلابهاوس، توییتر، فیسبوک، تلگرام و اینستاگرام، پیش چشمم جان گرفت و جولان کرد.
🖊در روزگاری به سر میبریم …
🔴 دربارهی پرفسور شاندلِ شریعتی
و فقر تخیلِ مفهومی دکتر غنینژاد
✍سینا جهاندیده
دکتر موسی غنینژاد، اقتصاددان و یکی از شناختهشدهترین منتقدان سنت چپ و روشنفکری دینی در ایران معاصر است. بخش مهمی از فعالیت فکری او در سالهای گذشته معطوف به نقد مارکسیسم، اندیشههای جمعگرایانه و شخصیتهایی چون علی شریعتی بوده است. او در برخی گفتوگوها و نوشتههای خود تلاش کرده است نشان دهد که بسیاری از مفاهیم رایج در روشنفکری ایرانی،…
باید سکوت را شکست
چند روز است فصل جدیدی از جنگ نابرابر و ظالمانه علیه ایران عزیزمان آغاز شده و اخبار هولناکی از کشتار هموطنان مظلوم و تخریب زیرساختها در جنوب کشور به گوش میرسد که قلب هر ایرانی منصفی را فشرده میکند.
برخلاف امواج قبلی جنگ، اما اینبار هنوز فضای عمومی کشور را سکوت فراگرفته و نشانی از احساس جنگ و واکنش به آن دیده نمیشود. اثر چندانی هم از فضای همدلی و وفاقی که در موج قبلی جنگ دیده میشود، باقی نمان…
📚ارانوس و دینگرایی
🖋️فَوتِر هانخراف | علیرضا سمنانی
📝نشر حکمت کلمه
ارانوس و دینگرایی مجموعه مقالاتی است که به موضوعاتی نظیر باطنیگرایی غربی، هرمنوتیک و گنوس اسلامی میپردازد. نوشتار نخستین با عنوان ارانوس و دینگرایی اثر فوتر هانخراف که نام اثر نیز برگرفته از آن است، نقش حلقۀ ارانوس و مهمترین چهرههای آن گرشوم شولم، هانری کُربن و میرچا الیاده را به بحث میگذارد.
🔗ارانوس و دینگرایی در شهر کتاب آنلاین
دیدن ه…
🔻این بخش از الفوائد المدنیة اثر ملامحمدامین استرآبادی (احیاگر مکتب اخباری) در پاسخ به این پرسش است که در اعتقادات دینی، علم اجمالی کفایت میکند یا تحصیل علم تفصیلی نیز لازم است. پاسخ ملا محمدامین استرآبادی آشکارا مثبت است، بله علم اجمالی کافی است: از نظر او، ایمان با اتکا به فطرت و ظواهر قرآن و سنت حاصل میشود و تحصیل علم تفصیلی از طریق کلام، منطق و فلسفه شرط تحقق ایمان نیست. بلکه او گامی فراتر مینهد و کلام را، آنگ…
سنجش فلسفی اسلام گرایی
نویسنده:عادل ضاهر
مترجم:یاسر میردامادی
👍11❤3
Signed Yaser Mirdamadi
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @YMirdamadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 275,213 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حباب؛ نوشته/گفتههای یاسر میردامادی” (@YMirdamadi), 5,085 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YMirdamadi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
