Channel
@iraniancityofphilosophy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,747subscribers
+79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002025548738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iraniancityofphilosophy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iraniancityofphilosophy |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 3,747 | +12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 3,735 | +29 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 3,706 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 3,699 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 3,704 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 3,700 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 3,695 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 3,686 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 3,682 | +12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 3,670 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 3,664 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 3,668 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
110 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 43.6% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 40.9% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما در فلسفه چیزی را نتیجهگیری نمیکنیم. «ولی باید اینطور باشد!» یک گزارۀ فلسفی نیست. فلسفه فقط چیزهایی را بیان میکند که همه بدانها اذعان دارند. فلسفه صرفاً همه چیز را پیش روی ما میگذارد، نه چیزی را تبیین میکند نه استنتاج. ________________________ پژوهشهای فلسفی، لودویگ ویتگنشتاین ________________________ www.philosophycity.ir
👎8❤7
Signed شهر فلسفه
موسسه دیروز برگزار میکند: یادگیری زبان آلمانی به عنوان مهارت پژوهشی (با تمرکز بر خوانش و فهم متون علوم انسانی) 👨🏫 مدرس: وحید احمدی • دانشآموختۀ دکتری فلسفه از دانشگاه تهران و پژوهشگر فلسفه • از مترجمان کتاب متنهایی درباره هرمنویتیک؛ از افلاطون تا امروز • دارای سابقۀ تدریس و برگزاری دورههای آموزش زبان آلمانی ━━━━━━━━━━━ سطح A1 📅 ۱۰ جلسه | پنجشنبهها ◽️ساعت ۱۰:۰۰ تا ۱۱:۰۰ ◽️ ساعت ۱۱:۳۰ تا ۱۲:۳۰ ◽️ شروع دوره:…
❤3
Signed شهر فلسفه
هیچکس هرگز عقل را جز در پیکری انسانی ندیده است؛ پس خدایان نیز باید پیکری انسانی داشته باشند. _____________________________ اپیکور (۳۴۱ تا ۲۷۰ پیش از میلاد) _____________________________ #اپیکور www.philosophycity.ir
❤4👍4👎4
Signed شهر فلسفه
⬛ میدونستی دنیا یه آشغلدونی متعفنه؟ میدونستی اگه جلوی خونهها رو برمیداشتی پشت همهشون کثافت پیدا میکردی؟ ________________________ 🎬 سایه یک شک، آلفرد هیچکاک، 1943 ________________________ #سایه_یک_شک؛ #آلفرد_هیچکاک www.philosophycity.ir
❤1👍1
Signed شهر فلسفه
انسان گرگ انسان است. توماس هابز 🏛 شهر فلسفۀ ایران از مجموعه دورههای آشنایی با متفکران پایهای برگزار میکند: 🛎 آشنایی با توماس هابز 📢 مدرس: امیرعباس سولیخانی 🗓 شنبهها ساعت 18 تا 20 ⏰ تاریخ آغاز: شنبه 17 مرداد 1405 ‼ برای ثبت نام به شهر فلسفۀ ایران در تلگرام (09361135000) پیام دهید. #توماس_هابز؛ #امیرعباس_سولیخانی www.philosophycity.ir
❤5👍1
Signed شهر فلسفه
«به گمانم، فلسفه امروز در میان آدمیان همان وضعی را دارد که گفتهاند گندم و شراب در روزگاران کهن در جهان داشتند. از همان آغاز، تاکها و خوشههای گندم بهگونهای پراکنده در دشتها میروییدند، اما کسی به کِشت و پرورش آنها نمیپرداخت. ازاینرو، مردم خوراک خویش را از بلوط فراهم میآوردند؛ و اگر کسی آنقدر جسور بود که میوههای ناشناخته و نامطمئن را بیازماید، سلامت خود را به خطر میانداخت. فلسفه نیز چنین است. هر انسانی فلس…
❤6👍3🔥1
Signed شهر فلسفه
میلورزی در زمانۀ ما هم گناهآلود است و هم ملالآور؛ زیرا میل در این زمانه چشم طمع به همسایه میدوزد. اما همسایه از آن چیزی که او میجوید بیش از خود او برخوردار نیست. www.philosophycity.ir
👍4❤1
Signed شهر فلسفه
دوزخ همان حقیقت است، اما حقیقتی که دیرهنگام بدان پی بردهایم. توماس هابز #توماس_هابز www.philosophycity.ir
❤5
Signed شهر فلسفه
كتاب یادداشتهای فیلموسوفیک مجموعهای از تأملات سینمایی است که از سال ۱۳۹۴ تاکنون نگاشته شدهاند. این جستارها با الهام از فلسفه، سیاست، و روانکاوی، تلاشی است برای اندیشیدن به سینما، نه با تعصب به نظریهای خاص، بلکه با ابزارهایی از لکان و نانسی و فوکو و دلوز و بدیو تا رانسیر و لیوتار و بنیامین و مارکس و…. نظریهها در اینجا فقط جعبهابزاری هستند برای گفتوگویی لذتبخش با فیلمهای محبوب نویسنده. سینما، مانند ادبیات و …
👍6
Signed شهر فلسفه
پیمانها بدون شمشیرها صرفاً کلمهاند و بس! این نه دانش بلکه اقتدار است که قانون میسازد. توماس هابز، لویاتان #توماس_هابز؛ #لویاتان www.philosophycity.ir
👍10
Signed شهر فلسفه
ترجیح میدهم با کودکان سخن بگویم، با آنان که هنوز میتوان امید داشت روزی موجوداتی معقول شوند؛ ولی امان از آنان که ذیشعور شدهاند - خدایا پناه بر تو! عقل مردم پارهسنگ برداشته! هیچگاه از آزادیهایی که براستی دارند استفاده نمیکنند، هماره آزادیهایی را که ندارند طلب میکنند؛ آزادی فکر دارند اما آزادی بیان میخواهند. ______________ _________ یا این یا آن، جلد اول، سورن کیرکگور، ترجمۀ صالح نجفی، نشر مرکز، 1399، صفحۀ 16 …
👍9👎3
Signed شهر فلسفه
تنها در جهان مدرن است که میتوان، مانند گوردون گکو در فیلم وال استریت (الیور استون، 1987) ادعا کرد «طمع خوب است». در جوامع باستانی طمع همواره معصیت به شمار میرفت (به عبارت دیگر، همواره پایداری نظم اجتماعی را تهدید میکرد)، اما همان چیزی که جوامع باستان را تهدید به نابودی میکرد به نیروی حیات جوامع مدرن بدل شده است. _________________________ پایان ناخرسندی، ژاک لکان و ظهور جامعۀ لذت، تاد مک گوان، ترجمۀ امیرعلی علیمحم…
❤1
Signed شهر فلسفه
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @iraniancityofphilosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شهر فلسفه ایران” (@iraniancityofphilosophy), 3,747 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iraniancityofphilosophy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.