Photo, posted without a caption
👌2❤1

Channel
@modiriran
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,253subscribers
-1,824 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001007815204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @modiriran |
| Description | ☀️ آموزشهای کاربردی و به روز برای مدیران و صاحبان کار و کسب علاقمند به توسعه پایدار کوچینگ توسعه فردی 44841991☎️ instagram.com/modiriran 📷 modiriran.ir 🛒 👥عضویت در باشگاه مدیران ایران: modiriran.ir/club 🎉تبلیغات @modiriran1 | 09383644531 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/modiriran |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Recorded in 2019 as “مدیران ایران” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @modiriran/21302 · this entry9 Oct 2026, 19:47 UTC | @strategym_academy/315412 Oct 2026, 05:18 UTC | 1.00 | 2 days |
| @modiriran/21129 · this entry16 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC | @strategym_academy/308017 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC | 0.99 | 17 hours |
| @modiriran/21097 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC | @strategym_academy/306510 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC | 0.98 | 4 days |
| @strategym_academy/316217 Oct 2026, 11:03 UTC | @modiriran/21333 · this entry17 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC | 0.97 | 2.1 hours |
| @modiriran/21430 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 10:11 UTC | @strategym_academy/31757 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC | 0.97 | 29 hours |
| @modiriran/21083 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC | @strategym_academy/30573 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC | 0.97 | 41 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @strategym_academy | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 29 hours | this entry (6–1) |
| @organizationalbehavior | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 4 days | this entry (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 195 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 03:18 | 34,253 | -55 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:46 | 34,308 | -50 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:27 | 34,358 | -25 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:35 | 34,383 | -48 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:44 | 34,431 | -31 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:26 | 34,462 | -61 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:30 | 34,523 | -76 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 34,599 | -161 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:58 | 34,760 | -166 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 34,926 | -219 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 35,145 | -124 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 35,269 | -160 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 35,429 | -93 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 35,522 | -92 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 35,614 | -66 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 35,680 | -118 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 35,798 | -104 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 35,902 | +970 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 34,932 | -57 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 34,989 | first reading |
325 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 110 of 118 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 325 (28 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 355,410 |
| Reactions total | 499 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,615 reactions across 297 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,283 | 35.5% | |
| 👍 | 893 | 24.7% | |
| 👌 | 684 | 18.9% | |
| 🤩 | 590 | 16.3% | |
| 🙏 | 52 | 1.44% | |
| 🤬 | 33 | 0.913% | |
| 🕊 | 30 | 0.83% | |
| 😱 | 18 | 0.498% | |
| 😢 | 17 | 0.47% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 0.249% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 0.166% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 305 of the 325 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,661 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 325 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @modiriran. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 325 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 26 of 119 posts held from the last 30 days (21.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
👌2❤1
ّسامر به شما کمک می کند مدیریت و رشد کسب و کارتان را حتی در شرایط فعلی با لذت انجام دهید. Saamer.ir
❤2👌2
همراهان خوب کانال مدیران ایران با این کد 5 درصد تخفیف ویژه دارند : Noghte5
🙏1
💡اقتصاد و کسبوکار در بحران؛ شناخت تحولات اقتصادی، روانشناختی، اجتماعی و فناورانه ایران و تأثیر آنها بر آینده کسبوکار و مسیر حرفهای. 💠مرکز کارآفرینی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف و پلتفرم نمو برگزار میکنند. 🗣️سخنرانان: 👤آذرخش مکری 🔺روانپزشک و استاد دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران. 👤 فرهاد نیلی 🔺اقتصاددان و استاد دانشگاه صنعتی شریف 👤 میلاد منشیپور 🔺کارآفرین حوزه هوش مصنوعی و تکنولوژی 👤سروش صحت 🔺تهیهکننده و کارگردان 👤مه…
🧠✍️ مدیران موفق فقط اطلاعات را ثبت نمیکنند؛ آنها به شیوه فکر کردنشان هم توجه میکنند! وقتی مینویسید، در مغزتان چه اتفاقی میافتد؟ آیا تا به حال فکر کردهاید چرا گاهی نوشتن چند جمله روی کاغذ، به شفافتر شدن یک تصمیم پیچیده کمک میکند؟ 🔬 پژوهشهای علوم اعصاب نشان میدهند که دستنویسی و تایپکردن، شبکههای عصبی متعدد و تا حدی متفاوتی را درگیر میکنند؛ شبکههایی که با پردازش زبان، برنامهریزی حرکتی، پردازش دیداری و…
سقف انتقال پول در ساتنا، پایا و پل افزایش پیدا کرد. طبق مصوبه بانک مرکزی، محدودیتهای جدید انتقال وجه به این صورته: ساتنا: حداقل انتقال ۲۰۰ میلیون تومان پایا: سقف غیرحضوری ۳۰۰ میلیون و حضوری ۵۰۰ میلیون تومان پل: سقف روزانه غیرحضوری ۲۰۰ میلیون و حضوری ۳۰۰ میلیون تومان همچنین هر حساب در سامانه پل روزانه حداکثر میتونه ۵ انتقال ورودی دریافت کنه 🌐 مدیران ایران | modiriran.ir @modiriran مدیران ایران 🕊
📌 جهش نرخ سود بینبانکی به ۳۴ درصد؛ زنگ خطر جدید برای کسبوکارهای ایرانی؟ 🔴 اتفاق مهمی در بازار پول ایران رخ داده که مدیران و صاحبان کسبوکار بهتر است آن را جدی بگیرند. بر اساس آمار رسمی بانک مرکزی، نرخ سود بازار بینبانکی در ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ از ۲۴ درصد به ۳۳٫۹۲ درصد رسیده است. همزمان، سقف نرخ اعتبارگیری بانکها از بانک مرکزی نیز از ۲۴ به ۳۴ درصد افزایش یافته است. اما این اعداد چه معنایی دارند و چه تأثیری بر آینده کسبو…
❤2
✅وقتی شخصیت یک مدیرعامل، سرنوشت یک شرکت چند تریلیون دلاری را تحت تأثیر قرار میدهد! ⚠️داستان سقوط سهام انویدیا، فقط یک خبر بورسی نیست؛ یک درس مهم مدیریتی است. انویدیا (NVIDIA)، یکی از ارزشمندترین شرکتهای جهان و بازیگر اصلی صنعت هوش مصنوعی، در روزهای اخیر با افت شدید ارزش سهام خود مواجه شده است. در ۵ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶، سهام این شرکت حدود ۹.۳ درصد سقوط کرد. علت اصلی، نگرانی سرمایهگذاران از آینده سرمایهگذاریهای سنگین در …
❤2👌2👍1
فصل ارزیابی که میرسد، در بسیاری از سازمانهای ایرانی حالوهوای اداره عوض میشود: مدیران با عجله فرم پر میکنند، کارکنان نگران نمرهاند و در نهایت بیشتر افراد نمرهای «خوب» یا «بسیار خوب» میگیرند که هیچ اطلاعات تازهای به کسی نمیدهد. ارزیابی عملکرد کارکنان اگر درست طراحی شود، یکی از قویترین ابزارهای مدیر برای رشد تیم است؛ و اگر غلط اجرا شود، انگیزه و اعتماد را از بین میبرد. در این مقاله به روشها، گامهای اجرا و…
❤2👌2
🎙️ پادکست گوش دادن نقادانه یکی از همراهان کانال «آموزش تفکر نقادانه» با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی Notebook زحمت کشیدند پادکست کتاب «گوش دادن نقادانه» را تهیه کردهاند. از ابتکار ارزشمند ایشان صمیمانه سپاسگزارم. 🌱 آموزش تفکر نقادانه https://t.me/wikifallacy
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍7
هفت سخنرانی جذاب TED برای فروشندگان ⭕️ سخنرانی ۱ آنچه من از ۱۰۰ روز تجربه نه شنیدن و طرد شدن آموختم https://www.aparat.com/v/b343530 ⭕️سخنرانی۲ میخواهید به کسی کمک کنید؛ ساکت باشید و گوشی کنید. https://www.aparat.com/v/lsa0zr0 ⭕️ سخنرانی ۳ زبان بدن شما هویت شما را شکل میدهد https://www.aparat.com/v/c7459i2 ⭕️ سخنرانی ۴ ثابت قدمی کلید اصلی موفقیت https://www.aparat.com/v/CvOQD ⭕️ سخنرانی ۵ چگونه گفتگوی ب…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 325 posts we hold for @modiriran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@modiriran edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 10 posts on @modiriran as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظر شما ترید با هوش مصنوعی به شکلی که در فضای مجازی هست واقعی است ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
شما جز کدوم دسته هستین ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام وبینار می تونه براتون مفید باشه ؟
The shares total 232%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 325 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@modiriran named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊” (@modiriran), 34,253 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modiriran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.