Photo, posted without a caption
❤11👍5👏2

Channel
@mahmoodbashash
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,081subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001025086219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mahmoodbashash |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mahmoodbashash |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 2,081 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 2,086 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 2,079 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 2,083 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 2,082 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 2,087 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 2,085 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 2,086 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 2,086 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
228 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 64.0% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 14.9% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 11.0% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 4.82% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 2.19% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2025 to 28 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11👍5👏2
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1y0lcGQ1qd8lco6y1mPNxk?si=I5RtVS7CQPi1ujA97CPh-g
❤7👍2👌1
سلام دوستان، امیدوارم پست جدید برای شما جالب و مفید باشد: https://open.substack.com/pub/digitalk/p/e109
❤6👏3👍1
اپیزودهای کوتاه مخصوص بیزیها🥰 https://open.spotify.com/episode/7FKkJuC5iTEJawInZWcWqd?si=_8Tco70GS3KDgptfRJI7Kw
❤4
https://open.spotify.com/episode/7rlAckZVxxFy9p4jGbU7mj?si=na4BI1sCQpyVRFa5wzpgnQ
❤3👏2
امیدوارم این پست جدید را بپسندید. منتظر کامنتهای شما هستم: https://open.substack.com/pub/digitalk/p/e105
❤10👍2👏1🥰1
هیچکدام از کتابهای من پرفروش نشدند. نه در صدر آمازون رفتند و نه مرا برای مصاحبه به تلویزیون بردند. اما هر کدام چیزی ارزشمندتر به من دادند: انضباط، استقامت و یک مزیت ناعادلانه. به عنوان یک تازهوارد به کانادا، هیچ شبکهای نداشتم، هیچ نقشهای نبود، هیچ پشتوانهای هم نبود. اما هر کتاب درسی بود برای هر کارآفرین: •انضباط از استعداد مهمتر است. •استمرار مهمتر از نبوغ است. •عملگرایی مهمتر از دیده شدن است. •نه شنیدن ز…
❤36👏9🤩3👍2👌1
اولین گوشی هوشمندی که حدود سالهای ۲۰۰۳ استفاده میکردم. اون زمان یک گوشی واقعا خاص و تک بود. با رنگ یاسی خاص و صفحه کلیدی که باز میشد و حتی قابلیت جدا شدن داشت و قلم استایلوس و دوربین فیلمبرداری. از داشتنش واقعا لذت میبردم. حالا با یک پرامپت ChatGPT ببین به چه روزش آمده🤦♂️ کل پرامپت را در این زیر برایت قرار دادهام که کپی کنی و سرگرم بشی🥰 ——————— Create a hyper-realistic and stylish poster in a 4:5 aspect…
❤4👍3👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
چطور از ChatGPT برای نوشتن محتوای تاثیرگذار استفاده کنیم🤖 ۱. ✂️ خلاصهسازی متن 🎯 هدف: رساندن مفهوم با وضوح و تاثیر بیشتر 🔸 برای موارد زیر استفاده کنید: سادهسازی جملات پیچیده حذف کلمات تکراری شکستن پاراگرافهای طولانی 💬 پرامپت پیشنهادی: «این متن را برای وضوح و تاثیر بیشتر خلاصه کن.» ۲. 🛠 اصلاح اشتباهات 🎯 هدف: حذف غلطهای املایی و گرامری برای حرفهایتر شدن متن 🔸 برای موارد زیر استفاده کنید: بررسی املاء و دستور زب…
❤4
👏 قانون ۸۰/۲۰ برای موفقیت در کسبوکار ۸۰٪ از نتایج شما از ۲۰٪ از تلاشهاتون میاد. 🔸 ۲۰٪ مشتریان = ۸۰٪ درآمد 🔸 ۲۰٪ عادتها = ۸۰٪ انرژی 🔸 ۲۰٪ محتوا = ۸۰٪ تعامل 🔸 ۲۰٪ ابزارها = ۸۰٪ بهرهوری 🔸 ۲۰٪ مهارتها = ۸۰٪ ارزش شغلی 🔸 ۲۰٪ هزینهها = ۸۰٪ خرج واقعی 🔸 ۲۰٪ جلسات = ۸۰٪ تصمیمگیری 🔸 ۲۰٪ استرس = ۸۰٪ اضطراب ✅ نکته طلایی: شناسایی این ۲۰٪ها، رمزی برای رشد سریعتر، سبکتر و هوشمندتره. ⸻ این پست رو ذخیره کن، چون ممکنه مس…
❤7👍6
🧠 ۱۱ مهارتی که هوش مصنوعی هرگز جایگزین نمیکند! هوش مصنوعی شگفتانگیزه، اما هنوز بعضی چیزها فقط دست انسانه! ✋ این ۱۱ مهارت، رمز موندگاری و موفقیت شغلی تو در دنیای آیندهست: 1️⃣ هوش هیجانی – درک احساسات و ایجاد ارتباط عمیق 2️⃣ اعتماد و صداقت – ساختن اعتبار با پایبندی و شفافیت 3️⃣ الهامبخشی به دیگران – برانگیختن ذهن و قلبها برای آیندهای روشن 4️⃣ قضاوت ارزشی – تصمیمگیری بر اساس ارزشها و اصول 5️⃣ مربیگری و راهنما…
👍8❤6👏2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mahmoodbashash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 951,593 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دیجیتال مارکتینگ با محمود بشاش از تورنتو” (@mahmoodbashash), 2,081 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahmoodbashash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.