رمپنا از زمان معرفی، تا امروز حدود ۴۰ درصد بازدهی داده! طلا تو همین مدت کمتر از ۱۵ درصد بازدهی داشته.
❤14👍1👎1

Channel
@BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,845subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001033420772 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance |
| Description | کانال تلگرامی دکتر مصطفی نصراصفهانی|موسسه بینشهای رفتاری ارتباط با ما: @WealthCounselor |
| Created | 9 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 8,845 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 8,849 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 8,860 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 8,860 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (6 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,202 |
| Reactions total | 546 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
863 reactions across 30 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 263 | 30.5% | |
| 👎 | 201 | 23.3% | |
| ❤ | 142 | 16.5% | |
| 🤣 | 112 | 13.0% | |
| 💔 | 50 | 5.79% | |
| 👏 | 43 | 4.98% | |
| 😢 | 42 | 4.87% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 1.04% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.116% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 863reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
رمپنا از زمان معرفی، تا امروز حدود ۴۰ درصد بازدهی داده! طلا تو همین مدت کمتر از ۱۵ درصد بازدهی داشته.
❤14👍1👎1
ترامپ داره به یک جای دیگه میزنه(هنوز انقدر خرفت نشده که چیز به این سادگی رو اشتباه کنه)! میخواد بگه که خود ما شاه رو هم سرنگون کردیم، چون قلدربازی میخواست دربیاره! این پست یارشار سلطانی در مورد اینکه اجازه غنیسازی اورانیوم در خاک ایران رو حتی به شاه هم ندادند رو ببینید. برای کنشگری درست باید مسیله را خوب فهمیده باشیم. @BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance
👍9👎4❤2
ترجمه توییت: «۵۱ سال رفتار بد..» پ.ن: حکومت فعلی ۴۷ سال است که روی کار است.
🤣14👍9👎4❤1
⭕️◻️لزوم تعیین تکلیف با اسرائیل پیرو دو پست قبلی، باید گفت واقعیت این است که زمان به نفع ایران نیست. من حواسم هست که اسباببازی نیروهای سیاسی مختلف (اعم از پوزیسیون و اپوزیسیون و ...) نشوم و باورم این است که همین حکومت اگر روابطش با سایر کشورها و روابطش با مردم را درست کند همه چیز خوب خواهد شد. کسی ممکن است بگوید این اصلاح/تغییر از جمهوری اسلامی ایران بعید است، اما من آن را کاملا ممکن میدانم. قدرتمندان جمهوری اسلا…
👎21❤15👍7
⭕️◻️آری! گفتگو با آمریکا کافی نیست، با اسرائیل هم باید گفتگو کرد! پیرو پست قبلی (اینجا) تو این ویدیو هم این آقا اگرچه به اصل داستان اشاره میکنه، اما راه حلی ارایه نمیکنه. راه حل، پایان دادن به جنگ با اسرائیل است. اگر فکر میکنید پشت خیمه معاویه هستید بروید و جنگ را تمام کنید، و اگر مثل من فکر میکنید این چیزی که آن را به خانه عنکبوت تشبیه کردید جنسش از سنگ خاره هم محکمتر است، بیش از این مردم را تحت فشار نگذارید. …
👍39👎15🙏1
اینکه هزینه شادکامی ایرانیان انقدر بالا رفته یکی از خروجیهای جنگ هیبریدی ۴۸ ساله است. و کسی که نتواند چیزی به این وضوح را ببیند در واقع کور است.
👍12👌1👎1👏1
⭕️◻️۴۸ سال جنگ با اسرائیل یکی از واقعیاتی که اصلاحطلبان جرات مطرح کردن آن را ندارند این است که ایران در ۴۸ سال بعد از انقلاب ۵۷ در یک جنگ پیوسته با اسرائیل قرار داشته است. اگر تکتک بلاها و تحریمهایی که بر سر مردم ایران آوار شد را بررسی کنید، پشت آن لابی آیپک و اسرائیل بوده است: ➖تحریمهای متنوع اقتصادی، ➖تهاجم فرهنگی (برای بالابردن آنتروپی) ➖مهندسی کردن اعتراضات اجتماعی و به خشونت کشاندن آنها(مثل همین دیماه …
👏21👎6👌3❤2
شاخص کل بورس امروز بالای ۱۲۴ هزار واحد مثبت شد. چیزی که تو تاریخ بورس بیسابقه هست. تو اوج بدبینیها و احتیاطهای نابجایی که اکثر تحلیلگرها داشتند ما همیشه روی ارزندگی بازار سهام تأکید میکردیم.
👏10👍6
قفل صف خرید...
❤4🤣4
⭕️◻️فعل و عمل ما را و دعوی ایشان را! تکهای که چند روز پیش سخنگوی وزارت خارجه به ترامپ انداخت بینظیر بود: «فعل و عمل ما را و دعوی ایشان را» پ.ن: این جمله اشاره به یکی از حکایتهای بیادبی عبید زاکانی هست که در اینجا از بازگو کردن آن صرفنظر میکنیم. ✔️ اقتصاد رفتاری @BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance
🤣16❤3👍1
⭕️◻️بوسههای مرحوم حاج اسماعیل بابایی، پدر شهید عباس بابایی بر پای پسرش شهید بابایی بیش از ۳۰۰۰ ساعت پرواز و ۶۰ عملیات جنگی موفق داشت و بنیانگذار سوختگیری هوایی با هواپیمای اف۱۴ بود. پانزدهم مردادماه، سالروز شهادت شهید عباس بابایی ✔️ اقتصاد رفتاری @BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance
❤42💔11😢3
یکی از آخرین ویدیوهای اکبر عبدی.
😢30💔9
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 391,330 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اقتصاد رفتاری” (@BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance), 8,845 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.