سوالات مشابه امروز دارین؟
- نه بلدیم در این حد17%
- آره منم تازه کارم83%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Mahboobe Golkar

Channel
@nevisagp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,313subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001388794187 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nevisagp |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nevisagp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 1,313 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 1,310 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 1,306 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 1,306 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (30 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,236 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 61.1% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سوالات مشابه امروز دارین؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
دوستمون میخواد تیتر بنویسه و همزمان اصول سئو رعایت بشه. پاسخ من: در هر عنوان یه عبارت یا کیورد رو هدف بگیر . اینجوری که گفتی اگه متظورت استفاده از سایر عبارات هم کانسپت( هم هدف از نظر موضوع) در زیر عنوانهاست، درسته اما اگه بخوای چند کیورد رو در یه تیتر بذاری چون سرچ بالایی دارن، درست پیش نمیری
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
در ظاهر منعی نداره اما سئو جلب رضایت مخاطبه با رعایت الگوریتمها که باز برگرفته از الگوهای رفتاری تکرارشونده کاربرهاست و موتورهای جستجو و حتی چتباتها هم به خوشایند کاربر فکر میکنن. پس به این نکات نگاه کن: خودت به عنوان کاربر اگه وارد سایتی بشی و توی تمام تایتلها واژه "قسطی" ببینی برات خوشایند و اعتمادزاست یا اینکه بنری باشه برای معرفی امکان قسطی و کال تو اکشن به لندینگی که شرایط اقساط رو میگه؟ مورد دوم: آیا اض…
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
توی مقاله سرچ انجین لند میگه داشتن نسخه مارک داون تنهایی کافی نیست و اگه حولست نباشه خودش میتونه چالش بشه. توی پست آقای زمانی میگه از این امکان برای بررسی سریع صفحات سایت خودت و رقبا میشه کمک بگیری حالا استاد الوهیمی میگن چون بخشی از خریدها و کارها به زودی با ایجنتهاست این نسخههای مارک داون واجبه برای اینکه انتخاب ایجنتها باشی. تقریبا دو سال پیش در وبیناری از بابک بنیادی هم شنیدم که ما باید دو نسخه از هر محتو…
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
ماجرای داشتن نسخه markdown داره جدی میشه. امروز پستی از آقای الوهیمی دیدم که لینکش رو میذارم. کنار لینک باقی مطالبی که در موردش قبلا گذاشته بودم. من اول اینجا ازش خوندم https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-cautions-against-markdown-versions-of-websites-for-ai-seo/ و این پست رو براش نوشتم: https://t.me/nevisagp/3648 بعد توی کانال آ. محمد زمانی پیشنهاد این سایت برای بررسی سریع رقبا http://markdown.new و حال…
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
نکته مهم اینه که جزئیات توافق رو بنویسید و درباره روش پیشنهادی اطلاعات بگیرین. ■تماس تنها یا تماس منجر به فروش ■چه درصدی؟ ■چه زمان تسویه میشه؟ ■با چه روشی تسویه میشه؟ ■اگه نشه در قبال زمان و انرژی که میذارین چطور محاسبه میشه ■این توافق تا چه زمانی و در چه شرایطی ادامه داره یا کنسل میشه؟ ■□■هر دو طرف لازمه جواب خودشونو داشته باشن این درخواست هم سئو تنها نیست در واقع شما دارین قرارداد بازاریابی و اگه تماس منجر به فر…
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
⭕️ وبینار چطور بیشتر بفروشیم؟ انتقال تجربه فروش ۱ میلیاردی در جت پیامک ✅ بعضی کسبوکارها هر روز تبلیغ میکنن، اما فروششون تغییری نمیکنه ✅ اگه احساس میکنید بازدید دارید، محتوا تولید میکنید، پیامک میفرستید یا تبلیغ میکنید اما هنوز فروش دلخواهتان را تجربه نکردهاید، این وبینار دقیقاً برای شماست 👨🏫 مدرس وبینار: سجاد کهریزی فاندر جت پیامک و کافه دی ام 📆 زمان وبینار: دوشنبه 19 مرداد ساعت 20 الی 21 🔗 لینک ثبت نام رای…
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
از دیروز میخوام ماجرای google flow رو دقیق بفهمم. ولی راستش کلاف ذهنم پیچیده بود تو هم. همین دغدغه رو توی کامنت گروه ویدئو مارکتینگ گذاشتم و خانم یوسفی عزیز دست به کار شد و در ۲ قسمت آموزش داده. رویه ایشون برای من یادآور اجایل یا چابک بود؛ رویکرد برای مدیریت پروژه است که بخشهای مختلف پروژه کوچک میشه تا رسیدن به هدف سریع و آسون بشه همزمان میتونید برای تغییرات بازار و بازخود به مخاطب پیشی بگیرین. تمرکز روش چابک، ر…
👍2
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
Posted without readable text
🔥1
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
چشم و دل کاربر باید سیر بشه؛ راهی نداره جز تغدیه اساسی با محتوای غنی . خاطر گاربر باید جمع و امن باشه، شدنیه اگه مدام بهش گوش بدی پ.ن: عکس از دوستیه که تخصصی برای معماری بوشهر محتوا میسازه
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
من یه قرار شخصی با خودم دارم؛ " هیچ آموزهای رو بیمصرف نذارم و خودمو توش پیدا کنم." حالا چقد بتونم و نتونم مهم نیست دیگه یاد گرفتیم " نیت مهمه😉" یادتونه با هوشمصنوعی یه تصویر ساختم برای پست "چطور در ۲۰۲۶ سئو محتوا کنیم؟" پشت بندش آقای مازندرانی از هوشمصنوعی کنوا کمک گرفت و بهبودش داد. حالا خانم یوسفی عزیز از گروه آموزشی ویدئو مارکتینگ اومده آموزش همون تغییرات رو داده با جزئیات تمام. به گمونم این رفقا هم با خو…
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
قدیما یکی معتمد محل بود کسی روی حرفش حرف نمیزد و حرفش حجت بود به خاطر شهرتش توی روراستی. به قول امروزیها honest و clear بود. هنوزم همینه و خواهد بود حتی با وجود هوشمصنوعی جدیتر هم میشه. توی اروپا و اون جاهایی که قانون و قاعده بیشتری برای رفتارهای اجتماعی هست، اگه محتوایی با هوش مصنوعی میسازی باید برچسب بزنی و بقیه رو خبردار کنی که محصول مشترک آدم و رباته. توی مقاله سرچ انجین لند هم گفته خیلی خوبه که با فناو…
❤4👍1
Signed Mahboobe Golkar
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nevisagp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
سوالات مشابه امروز دارین؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 805,417 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بازاریابی و فروش با محتوا” (@nevisagp), 1,313 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevisagp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.