Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for با متمم | هایلایت | محمدرضا شعبانعلی

Channel

با متمم | هایلایت | محمدرضا شعبانعلی

@bamotamem

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

25,905subscribers

+404 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002346696889
TypeChannel
Username@bamotamem
Descriptionاین‌جا چیزهایی را می‌نویسم که یا آن‌قدر کوتاهند که مناسب متمم و روزنوشته‌ها نیستند یا قرار است بعدا درباره‌شان بیشتر بنویسم. اسمش را می‌شود گذاشت "هایلایت" motamem.org mrshabanali.com محمدرضا شعبانعلی
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bamotamem

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

18,500 average views per post against 25,905 subscribers — an engagement rate of 71.6%. Across the 4,414 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,006–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.68% and 13.3%, with a median of 6.38%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (30 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Posts measured14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled259,600
Mature posts only71.6% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers25,905 measured 25 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 4,414 channels · p10 1.15% · p25 2.68% · p50 6.38% · p75 13.3% · p90 21.9%
Position in cohort99.479th percentile · 11.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.042% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 29 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

25,48725,90525,6966 August 2026 — 25,501 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,501 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,502 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,499 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,497 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,498 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,500 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,501 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,496 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,489 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,491 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,495 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,494 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,488 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,490 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,488 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,492 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,487 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,499 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,502 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,495 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,494 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,501 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,504 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,499 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,508 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,491 subscribers8 September 2026 — 25,513 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,578 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,629 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,724 subscribers16 September 2026 — 25,774 subscribers18 September 2026 — 25,798 subscribers25 September 2026 — 25,905 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +404. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,424–25,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 00:3725,905+107
18 Sept 2026, 16:0125,798+24
16 Sept 2026, 11:0025,774+50
14 Sept 2026, 16:4025,724+95
13 Sept 2026, 06:0225,629+51
11 Sept 2026, 05:5625,578+65
8 Sept 2026, 08:5725,513+22
5 Sept 2026, 04:0125,491-17
3 Sept 2026, 09:3425,508+9
2 Sept 2026, 04:4725,499-5
1 Sept 2026, 03:1525,504+3
31 Aug 2026, 04:1625,501+7
30 Aug 2026, 07:4325,494-1
29 Aug 2026, 10:4925,495-7
28 Aug 2026, 11:1325,502+3
26 Aug 2026, 10:3725,499+12
25 Aug 2026, 11:3425,487-5
22 Aug 2026, 22:0625,492+4
21 Aug 2026, 09:3625,488-2
20 Aug 2026, 07:2225,490first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 13 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.6%
avg views ÷ 25,905 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,500
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held34 (13 December 2025 – 25 September 2026)
Views total259,600
Reactions total8,895
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
245
Videos
20
Links
150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 11s
Average length
4m 06s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

34,439 reactions across 34 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤23,26867.6%
👍9,29827.0%
✍1,2283.57%
🐳6451.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,439 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 16:29 UTC≈11,800 views972 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

ادای احترام بر سردر ساختمان اصلی ادارهٔ پست آمریکا در نیویورک (ساختمان فارلی) جمله‌ای حک شده که شاید قبلاً در عکس‌ها دیده باشید: «نه برف، نه باران، نه گرما، و نه تاریکی شب، هیچ‌یک این پیک‌ها را از انجام سریع مأموریت‌شان بازنمی‌دارد.» جمله در سال ۱۹۱۴ حک شده و آن‌قدر معروف است که بسیاری آن را شعار رسمی پست آمریکا می‌دانند. دیوید لئونارد در کتاب «نه برف و نه باران» که به تاریخچهٔ پست آمریکا اختصاص دارد،‌ داستان پشت…

❤855👍93✍24

21 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC≈16,300 views454 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

از امید به امید قدرت پرواز ذهن بشر را آن‌جا می‌توان دید که از امیدی پر می‌گیرد و بر امیدی دیگر می‌نشیند. مضمون از ساموئل جانسون #جمله‌های_روزانه_متمم

❤405👍38✍11

21 Sept 2026, 06:53 UTC≈15,900 views432 reactionsread 29 September 2026

یه زمانی در جنگ ایران و عراق، یه جمله‌ای از کیسینجر نقل می‌شد با این مضمون که: «کاش می‌شد توی این جنگ هر دوشون ببازن.» (احتمال بسیار زیاد خودش گفته. نگفته باشه هم تصمیم‌هاش کاملاً در این راستا بود. معتقد بود که توی جنگ باید از طرفی که خیلی ضعیف شده حمایت کرد تا استهلاک دو طرف بیشتر بشه و ماجرا با هزینهٔ کم جمع نشه). من حس می‌کنم احتمالاً چین در اوضاع فعلی با توجه به پروژه‌های B&R در منطقه چنین نگاهی داره. هم دوست…

❤271👍137✍24

20 Sept 2026, 17:56 UTC≈14,900 views438 reactionsread 29 September 2026

برنامهٔ B&R - قسمت سوم برداشت من اینه که اون‌قدر که از B&R میشه ایده‌ها و استراتژی‌ها و جهت‌گیری چین رو فهمید، از بریکس و سازمان همکاری شانگهای نمی‌شه فهمید. می‌دونم مقایسهٔ یه برنامه با یک سازمان یا مجمع یا معاهده غلطه. اما از این نظر می‌گم که توی B&R دست چین بازه و گیر هماهنگی با دولت‌های متعدد نیست. از طرفی، مستقیماً باید منابع رو به پروژه‌ها تخصیص بده. بنابراین شاید توی بریکس و شانگهای یه جاهایی تعارف تیکه‌پار…

❤360👍56✍22

20 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC≈11,500 views282 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

برنامهٔ B&R - قسمت دوم دولت چین از سال ۲۰۱۳ برنامهٔ Belt & Road Initiative رو شروع کرد. منظور از Belt یا کمربند، مسیر زمینه. Road هم این‌جا منظور جاده نیست، راهه؛ راه دریایی. ایدهٔ B&R توسعه مسیر زمینی و دریایی چین به غرب (مشخصاً اروپا) هست و حدوداً ۱۵۰ کشور درگیرش هستن. یعنی چین یک به یک با کشورها رفته حرف زده و با هر کدوم یه چارچوبی در آورده که چه همکاری‌هایی در این مسیر می‌تونه باهاشون داشته باشه. دو تا کتاب در…

❤213👍52✍17

20 Sept 2026, 14:21 UTC≈12,900 views519 reactionsread 29 September 2026

دولت چین و وضع امروز خاورمیانه برنامهٔ B&R - قسمت اول به‌نظرم میاد دوستانی که این روزها دنبال تحلیل وضعیت فعلی خاورمیانه و بررسی سناریوهای احتمالی آتی هستن، به‌طور ویژه‌ای به ایران، آمریکا و بازی بازیگران منطقه‌ای توجه می‌کنن و سهم کمتری رو به چین اختصاص می‌دن. این در حالیه که تصمیم‌های چین در سال‌های اخیر نقش مهمی در منطقه داشته (چه جاهایی که برخلاف انتظار مداخله کرده؛ مثل رابطهٔ ایران و عربستان. چه جاهایی که با و…

❤387👍106✍26

18 Sept 2026, 17:56 UTC≈13,500 views657 reactionsread 29 September 2026

علت اصلی نوشتن بیشتر آن است که نویسنده نمی‌تواند ننویسد. حسن کامشاد منبع ‌

❤487👍131✍39

17 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC≈18,000 views675 reactionsread 29 September 2026

روشنفکر دینی پیش از این هم چند بار گفته‌ام. ترکیب «روشنفکر دینی» با بدسلیقگی ساخته شده. بهتره به جای این ترکیب از اصطلاح «نواندیش دینی» استفاده کنیم. ما در حوزهٔ دین و دینداری با دو دسته آدم روبه‌رو هستیم. یه عده از دینداران که زندگی‌شون رو می‌کنن و کاری هم با فکر و اندیشه و اندیشه‌ورزی ندارن. گروه کوچک‌تری از دینداران هم هستند که در حوزهٔ دین فکر میکنن و دغدغه دارن. برای این گروه دوم میشه یه طیف در نظر گرفت از که…

❤455👍185✍35

16 Sept 2026, 17:38 UTC≈16,800 views305 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

توضیح تکمیلی دربارهٔ خاطرات آندره وی کتاب اصلی به زبان فرانسه است. ترجمهٔ انگلیسی (که من هایلایت‌هاش رو گذاشتم) با هماهنگی خود آندره وی انجام شده و عنوانش رو The Apprenticeship of a Mathematician گذاشته‌ان. الان سرچ کردم دیدم نشر نی هم ترجمهٔ فارسی کتاب رو به اسم «شاگردی یک ریاضیدان» منتشر کرده‌. کیفیت ترجمه رو نمی‌دونم. خودتون باید نگاه کنید. اسم نویسنده روی جلد آندره ویل خورده که شاید بعداً آندره وی بشه بهتر با…

❤255👍34✍16

16 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTC≈15,000 views471 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

تمرین تایپ زندگی‌نامهٔ آندره وی (Andre Weil) جالبه. این ریاضیدان فرانسوی در سفری به فنلاند، در هتلی نزدیک مرز فنلاند و شوروی بوده. برای این‌که خانمش مهارت تایپ سریع رو فراموش نکنه، گاهی یه متن‌هایی رو براش می‌خونده و اون تایپ می‌کرده. این کار رو در اون سفر هم انجام می‌دن (و لابه‌لاش، متوقف می‌شدن و از منظره لذت می‌بردن) ظاهراً میزبان‌ مشکوک می‌شه (چرا یه نفر دوردست رو نگاه می‌کنه و به خانمش می‌گه مشاهداتش رو تایپ …

❤413✍33👍25

14 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTC≈27,800 views1,031 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

جسارت پذیرش نامحبوب بودن اگر صرفاً در پی این باشی که دوستت داشته باشند، باید هر لحظه و هر جا آماده باشی که بر سر هر چیز کوتاه بیایی. و در نهایت هم به هیچ چیز نخواهی رسید. مارگارت تاچر __ ده‌ها نفر به ده‌ها بیان این حرف رو گفته‌ان. اما به قول حافظ، از هر زبان که می‌شنوی نامکرر است. #جمله‌های_روزانه_متمم

❤818👍190✍23

12 Sept 2026, 16:42 UTC≈22,700 views353 reactionsread 29 September 2026

هوش مصنوعی و انقراض انسان یکی از دوستان متممی توی روزنوشته‌ها به بحث "هوش مصنوعی و خطر انقراض انسان" که اخیراً دوباره زیاد شنیده می‌شه اشاره کرده بود و نظر من رو هم پرسیده بود. طبیعتاً برای چنین بحث‌هایی، دانش و مطالعهٔ تخصصی لازمه که من به اندازهٔ کافی ندارم. اینه که یه جواب نسبتاً مختصر و شخصی نوشتم. اعتبار حرف‌هام رو در حد گپ‌های مردم توی تاکسی (که گاهی تحلیل خاورمیانه و آمریکا و ... رو هم پوشش می‌ده) در نظر …

❤284👍50✍19

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @bamotamem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bamotamem edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 September 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“با متمم | هایلایت | محمدرضا شعبانعلی” (@bamotamem), 25,905 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bamotamem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.