Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کافه ارتباط | Cafe Ertebat

@CafeErtebat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,957subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001353825951
TypeChannel
Username@CafeErtebat
Created25 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CafeErtebat

Growth

3,9263,9573,941.56 August 2026 — 3,926 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,926 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,942 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,957 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,921–3,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:443,957+15
9 Aug 2026, 17:023,942+16
6 Aug 2026, 11:313,926no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:523,926first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.8%
avg views ÷ 3,957 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held12 (13 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total7,880
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

191 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9449.2%
👍4523.6%
👌2814.7%
🎉136.81%
🙏42.09%
😁31.57%
🫡21.05%
🕊10.524%
😢10.524%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 12 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CafeErtebat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,760 views28 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🗣 متعدد میگن که... ◀️ اصلاً فکرشم نمی‌کردم تا اینجا پیش ببری ◀️ چقدر خوبه که این مدلی هوای تیم‌تون رو دارین ◀️ حتم داشتم که خسته میشی نه اینکه سه سال ادامه بدی ◀️ تابحال ندیده بودم کسی اینقدر برای مخاطبش احترام قائل باشه ◀️ من اینهمه ایونت رفتم، جالب بود ندیده بودم کسی این مدلی اجرا کنه ◀️ توی جنگ، زمانیکه بیشتر برندها متوقف بودن، شما فعال بودین دم‌تون گرم 📈 هر چند که صدِ ما همین هست و البته که استاندارد، این نیست

19👍5👌3🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,620 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⁉️ میزِ بیزینس چی هست!؟ ☑️ در این ۱۱ سال Business Networking در کافه ارتباط آموختیم که خیلی از اتفاقات، در شرایطِ به قول معروف «اَفتِری» رخ میده. یعنی بعد از برگزاری برنامه‌های ۸۰ نفره، اون ۵% نفر گلچین‌شده، گُل و اصلِ ماجرا هستن...! ✅ نزدیک به دوسالی هست که در دورهمی‌های کافه ارتباط، یک ردیف یک بلیطی اضافه کردیم با عنوان «میز بیزینس یا VIP» که افرادی که در کسب‌وکار، جدی هستند و Asset و دارایی دارند که می‌تونن با د

👌7👍43

27 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,440 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨آخرین اطلاع‌رسانی🚨 همین الآن که دارید این پیام رو می‌خونید، از ۸۰ نفر شاید حتی همین ۲ ظرفیت هم تموم شده باشه! اگر برای شما هم: ☑️ ارتباط با میهمان (مدیرعامل پیلبان) ☑️ توسعه‌ی شبکه‌ی حرفه‌ای ☑️ معرفی خود برای ۷۹ نفر دیگر... اهمیت دارد، همین الان ثبت‌نام کنید 🔗 ثبت‌نام فوری (غیرقابل تمدید⚠️) 🧲 @Cafe Ertebat 🤝 جایی که ارتباط، موثر است

👍4👌2😢1🙏1

25 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,200 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

♥️ دورهمی‌ای که بخاطرش از کرج، اصفهان، قزوین، تبریز، ارومیه و... میان تهران، هر نقطه‌ای از تهران🫡

7👍4😁3👌2🕊1

25 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,860 views15 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♥️ پس از ۸ مااااه دوری از شما، قصد داریم ۹۳ اُمین دورهمی حضوری کافه ارتباط رو برگزار کنیم... 🎤 جناب آقای #علی_رضایی ☑️ مدیر آژانس خلاقیت #پیلبان ✅ برند، آنچه هست و آنچه باید باشد ✅ از بریف تا خلق برند ✅ خلاقیت در خدمت کامیونیتی ✅ خلاقیت و شکست 🔗 ثبت‌نام در دورهمی کافه ارتباط ⚠️ از ۸۰ ظرفیت فقط ۲ ظرفیت باقیست 🧲 @Cafe Ertebat 🤝 جایی که ارتباط، موثر است

10👍4🎉1

9 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,750 views20 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

☝️راستی ⏳ما بزودی دورهمی حضوری کافه ارتباط، مدیران و یک دورهمی جدیدِ که بسیار کارآمد هم هست رو شروع می‌کنیم... ✍️ محتواهای آموزشیِ کسب‌وکاری هم بزودی استارت می‌خوره✍️

👍85🎉4👌3

9 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,560 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Community_TechTalkVideo

❌ محصولی که فیدبک نگیرد، محکوم به مرگ خاموش و در نهایت Shut Down است! ⏳ اینکه هر از گاهی با روش‌های متفاوت به سراغ ذینفعان برویم و از آن‌ها بازخورد بگیریم، یک کار لوکس نیست، بلکه یک ضرورت است. همین بازخوردهای مستمر است که به ما کمک می‌کند بعد از هر ریلیز، محصولی کارآمدتر، دقیق‌تر و نزدیک‌تر به خروجی مطلوب خلق کنیم و محصولِ بدون فیدبک، مثل رانندگی با چشم بسته در اتوبان است...! 🗣 جمعه ۲۹ خرداد ۱۴۰۵ با جمعی گلچین شده

12👍3👌1🙏1

30 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,520 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Community_TechTalkVideo

🙏 همراهی شما در این رویداد تخصصی باعث شد تا تجارب گرانبهای شرکت‌کنندگانِ سینیور، بجای اینکه در ذهن‌ها خاک بخورد، بیرون ریخته شده، از زاویای دیگر هم بررسی و چکش‌کاری شود تا سایرین همان خطاها را مرتکب نشوند. شما عاملی بر بقای کامیونیتی تِک کشور بودین. دست شما را به گرمی می‌فشاریم🤝 💎 حامی چهارمین دورهمی تخصصی تِک‌تاک؛ کاریابی بین‌المللی نیکان (PluSolutions) 🎯 متمرکز بر جاب آفر و بلوکارت آلمان 🎯 دیجیتال نومد اسپانیا (ا

9👍3👌1🙏1

20 Jun 2026, 14:39 UTC≈5,010 views27 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫀 قلب تپنده‌ی یک بیزینس، طبیعتاً محصولِ آن کسب و کار است و تا زمانیکه اجزای سازنده‌ی آن محصول، بایکدیگر «تعامل قوی و حرفه‌ای» نداشته باشند، از محصول و کسب درآمد و رشد و موفقیت، خبری نیست، یعنی از بیزینس خبری نیست!!! 🗣 جمعه ۲۹ خرداد ۱۴۰۵ با جمعی گلچین شده از بین چند صد متخصص (مدیران فنی، مدیران محصول، تِک‌لید و برنامه‌نویسان سینیور) در این مورد صحبت کردیم که: > چالشِ اصلی CTO و CPO دقیقاً کجاست!؟ > کجا، چه کسی تصمیم‌

17👍6👌3🎉1

18 Jun 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,360 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

📊 نزدیک به ۷۰۰ بازدید و ۲۱۶ مشارکت!! 👍 اصلاً توقع‌اش رو نداشتیم!

🎉53👍1

14 Jun 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,740 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

✅ زیر ۲۴ ساعت ۳۵۰ نفر بازدید و ۱۳۰ نفر مشارکت!☝️ 🤔 البته تعجبی نداشت که ۷۵% تِکی هستن و ۲۵% پروداکتی :) 🔍 خب دیگه بریم برای غربالگری این عزیزان برای ایونتِ جمعه😉 🔗 دورهمی حضوری TechTalk؛ چالش‌های تِک و پروداکت 🆔 @CafeErtebat

👌65🎉2👍2

13 Jun 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,600 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

⚠️ عزیزان یک خطایی در پرسشنامه بود که حل شد. اگر تا پیش از این لحظه پر کرده بودین، خواهشمندیم دوباره اقدام کنین🙏

4🫡2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @CafeErtebat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 76,824 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کافه ارتباط | Cafe Ertebat” (@CafeErtebat), 3,957 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CafeErtebat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.