Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 31 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @tavaanatech — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,597. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79,990–82,067 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 06:10
80,230
-7
8 Nov 2026, 21:06
80,237
-33
7 Nov 2026, 12:41
80,270
-26
6 Nov 2026, 09:46
80,296
-28
5 Nov 2026, 12:26
80,324
-26
4 Nov 2026, 15:28
80,350
-21
3 Nov 2026, 13:59
80,371
-12
2 Nov 2026, 10:56
80,383
-7
1 Nov 2026, 07:37
80,390
-17
31 Oct 2026, 06:20
80,407
-17
30 Oct 2026, 04:30
80,424
-21
29 Oct 2026, 07:56
80,445
-13
28 Oct 2026, 03:08
80,458
-22
27 Oct 2026, 02:31
80,480
-15
26 Oct 2026, 01:22
80,495
-4
24 Oct 2026, 03:28
80,499
-13
23 Oct 2026, 06:01
80,512
+1
22 Oct 2026, 03:37
80,511
+2
20 Oct 2026, 21:45
80,509
-29
19 Oct 2026, 23:27
80,538
first reading
Engagement
897 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.64%
avg views ÷ 80,230 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,520
266 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
267
of 897 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
897 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
1,202,970
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 19:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈25,500
Videos
≈11,400
Links
≈17,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 44m
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 287 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 30 of 267 posts held from the last 30 days (11.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
مادر جاویدنام دانیال برکتی:
ما این بچهها را برای گلوله خوردن بزرگ نکرده بودیم!
لیلا سجادیان، مادر دانیال برکتی، با انتشار تصویری از کودکیهای فرزندش نوشت:
«ما این بچه ها رو برای گلوله خوردن بزرگ نکرده بودیم! ما برای اینکه برق زندگی تو چشماشون باشه همه کار کردیم تا بزرگ بشن و جلو چشمامون راه برن و قربون صدقه شون بریم، تا جشن ازدواج براشون بگیریم بچه هاشون و تو آغوش بگیریم تا زندگی کنند ، زندگی کنیم .
امیدوارم اونایی…
⚠️بدافزار پنهان در یک فایل ZIP واتساپ میتواند رمزها و اطلاعات بانکی شما را سرقت کند
پیامی با عنوان «رسید پرداخت» از شماره یکی از آشنایان میرسد و از شما میخواهد فایل پیوست را فوری باز کنید. اگر منتظر چنین فایلی نبودید، اول با آن فرد تماس بگیرید و بپرسید چه چیزی فرستاده است. مهاجمان میتوانند از حساب هکشده یک آشنا پیام بفرستند و فایل مخرب را با عنوانهایی مثل «فاکتور»، «رسید پرداخت» یا «گزارش مالی» جا بزنند.
در …
ادعای حسین طائب درباره تقاضای بیش از ۳۰ کشور برای تجهیزات ایران!
کاربران میپرسند کدام کشورها؟
حسین طائب، رئیس سازمان بسیج مستضعفین، در اختتامیه دومین رویداد ملی «تا ثریا» در شیراز گفت ایران که زمانی برای پایش دادههای ماهوارهای و استفاده از سامانههای راداری به خارج وابسته بود، حالا به جایی رسیده که «بیش از ۳۰ کشور جهان خواهان استفاده از تجهیزات ساخت ایران هستند.»
پرسش شهروندان خیلی ساده است. این بیش از ۳۰ کشور …
مادر رهام سعادتی پس از ده ماه هنوز پسرش را صدا میزند:
هوا سرده، سرما میخوری
ده ماه پس از آنکه رهام سعادتی، نوجوان ۱۷ ساله، با شلیک مستقیم نیروهای سرکوب در اعتراضات کرج کشته شد، مادرش در یادداشتی از بوی لباسهای پسرش نوشته که هنوز در خانه مانده است. با سرد شدن هوا، به بیرون آوردن کاپشن رهام از کمد فکر میکند و باز صدایش میزند
«هوا سرده، سرما میخوری».
خانواده رهام سعادتی، نوجوان ۱۷ ساله و عضو تیم والیبال ستارگان …
مادر آرش یزدانی:
۱۰ ماهه که آغوشت از من گرفته شده
آرش یزدانی، جوان ۲۷ ساله، شامگاه ۱۸ دیماه ۱۴۰۴ حدود ساعت ۱۲ شب در محدوده هفتحوض نارمک تهران بر اثر اصابت گلوله جان خود را از دست داد.
او هدف سه گلوله جنگی قرار گرفت که به ناحیه پهلو و کلیه او اصابت کرده بود. به گفته منابع نزدیک، پس از مجروح شدن، او را برای احیا به بیمارستان منتقل کردند، اما تلاشها برای نجات جانش بینتیجه ماند.
پیکر آرش یزدانی پس از انتقال به سرد…
فرانسه در گزارش هک یخچالهای فروشگاهها از سه مقام سپاه نام برد
فرانسه میگوید حملهای که در شب ۱۱ به ۱۲ اکتبر سامانههای سرمایشی حدود ۷۰۰ مرکز فروش و توزیع را هدف گرفت، به دستور سپاه پاسداران و به دست واحد سایبری «شهید کاوه» انجام شد. مهاجمان تنظیمات یخزدایی را از راه دور دستکاری کردند. بخشی از مواد غذایی از بین رفت و مقامهای فرانسه دستکم ۱۵ مورد آتشسوزی ثبت کردند.
🔸در گزارش فنی منتشرشده در CERT-FR، حمیدرضا لش…
فرانسه سپاه را مسئول هک یخچالهای صدها فروشگاه دانست
در شب ۱۱ به ۱۲ اکتبر، مهاجمان از راه دور تنظیمات یخزدایی یخچالها و فریزرهای فروشگاههای فرانسه را دستکاری کردند. در بعضی فروشگاهها دما به ۵۰ درجه سانتیگراد رسید و کارکنان ناچار شدند مواد غذایی تازه و منجمد را دور بریزند. حدود ۷۰۰ مرکز توزیع و فروش، از جمله شعبههای کارفور و اینترمارشه، هدف قرار گرفتند. مقامهای فرانسه دستکم ۱۵ مورد آتشسوزی ثبت کردند و ارزش م…
⚠️هشدار درباره آگهیهای استخدامی جعلی؛
وقتی وعده شغل پردرآمد به سرقت اطلاعات ختم میشود!
به گزارش ایران هشدار، کلاهبرداران سایبری با سوءاستفاده از نیاز افراد به اشتغال، آگهیهای استخدامی جذاب و فریبندهای منتشر میکنند؛ آگهیهایی با وعدههایی مانند حقوق بالا، استخدام فوری، شرایط آسان و مزایای غیرمتعارف که ممکن است در واقع پوششی برای سرقت اطلاعات شخصی و بانکی کاربران باشد.
در این شیوه، مجرمان با جلب اعتماد متقاضیان …
پرونده قضایی علیه یک پزشک زنان و زایمان و مسدود شدن صفحه اینستاگرامش
یک پزشک متخصص زنان و زایمان در ویدیویی در صفحه اینستاگرامش گفت چهار نوزاد از مادرانی به دنیا آمدهاند که ازدواج نکرده بودند. به گفته او، هر چهار مادر آگاهانه تصمیم گرفته بودند فرزندانشان را به دنیا بیاورند و میدانستند که پدران این کودکان در کنارشان نخواهند بود.
پس از انتشار این ویدیو، دادستانی تهران برای این پزشک پرونده قضایی تشکیل داد و صفحه او …
نرگس علمی، پژوهشگر ۳۰ ساله ژنتیک، شامگاه یکشنبه ۲۱ دی ۱۴۰۴ در تهران با شلیک گلوله کشته شد
چمدان نرگس علمی بسته بود و ویزایش را گرفته بود. این پژوهشگر ۳۰ ساله و دانشآموخته ژنتیک دانشگاه تهران، برای شروع فصل تازهای از زندگیاش آماده میشد. شامگاه یکشنبه ۲۱ دی ۱۴۰۴، او و خواهرش در خودرویی در تهران هدف تیراندازی قرار گرفتند.
به گفته شاهدان، یکی از نیروهای جمهوری اسلامی اسلحهاش را به شیشه بالارفته خودرو نزدیک کرد و ش…
آرنیکا دباغ، نوجوان ۱۵ ساله که دیماه ۱۴۰۴، با شلیک مستقیم گلوله جان شیرینش را از دست داد
آرنیکا دباغ یک ورزشکار نوجوان، دانشآموز و شناگر اهل گرگان بود که در جریان اعتراضات سراسری در سن ۱۵ سالگی هدف شلیک مستقیم گلوله قرار گرفت و جان باخت.
خواهر آرنیکا در یادداشتی نوشت که همان شب حادثه عینک خونآلود آرنیکا را پیدا کرد و در ابتدا تصور میکرد بدترین حالت، آسیبدیدگی چشم او باشد. او گفت جرات نداشت وارد سردخانه شود، اما…
📱 اینستاگرام حالا سن نوجوانان را با هوش مصنوعی تخمین میزند حتی اگر خودشان را بزرگسال معرفی کرده باشند
اگر تاریخ تولد ثبتشده در اینستاگرام شما را بزرگسال نشان دهد، اینستاگرام همچنان میتواند حسابتان را در گروه نوجوانان قرار دهد. متا روز ۹ نوامبر اعلام کرد که استفاده از هوش مصنوعی برای شناسایی کاربران ۱۳ تا ۱۷ ساله را در سراسر جهان گسترش میدهد. اگر سامانه احتمال دهد حسابی متعلق به یک نوجوان است، تنظیمات «حساب نوجو…
Showing the 12 most recent of 897 posts we hold for @tavaanatech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tavaanatech edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tavaanatech named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sketch named in 1 post, 10 September 2026 – 10 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بشکن Beshkan @beshkan · 275,190 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
آموزشکده توانا @Tavaana_TavaanaTech · 47,494 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
کتابخانه مجازی @ketabkhaneh2015 · 47,389 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
Paskoocheh | پسکوچه @paskoocheh · 124,901 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
|Swallow English|اینجا زبان رو قورت بده @SwallowEng · 32,234 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
فریبرز کرمی زند @F_karamizand · 34,545 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Top Persian ✅ @top_p · 43,735 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
شبكه رسانهاى بیان @BayanMediaNetwork · 24,107 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Iranwire @Farsi_Iranwire · 47,351 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
Hossein Ronaghi - حسین رونقی @hosseinronaghi · 18,407 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026
مسیح علینژاد @masih_alinejad · 54,540 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
I am Zeus @zeus110 · 22,974 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Aasoo - آسو @NashrAasoo · 29,062 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
DW Persian دویچهوله فارسی @dw_farsi · 114,660 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری) @FarazTed · 21,045 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
RadioFarda @radiofarda · 110,019 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
AVATODAY @javanmardi77 · 198,639 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
حافظه تاریخی @hafezeye_tarikhi · 139,881 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
مجتبا پورمحسن/ Mojtaba Pourmohsen @mojtabapourmohsen · 23,815 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
{ CMO } چرکنویس مدیا🎈 @Rfrens · 54,514 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
تلویزیون منوتو @manototv · 373,151 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Toomaj | توماج @ToomajSalehi · 31,120 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
آزادنیوز 📡 @anzalishahreeshghe · 33,885 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
رادیوایران✌️✌️ @Radioiran_plus · 43,916 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 70 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
9 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تواناتک Tavaanatech” (@tavaanatech), 80,230 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tavaanatech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.