3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,150–2,156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 06:56
2,151
-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:07
2,155
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:48
2,155
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 2,151 subscribers
Avg views / post
365
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
21 (23 May 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
2,187
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
85 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
33
38.8%
👍
27
31.8%
🔥
12
14.1%
😢
12
14.1%
🤩
1
1.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
در این پست صوتی در خصوص متنی که یکی از دانشجویان درباره تبلیغی که در جام جهانی دیده بود نوشته بود، تاثیر همکلاسان در کیفیت کلاس، ویدئوهای آموزشی که داشتم در یوتیوب قرار میدادم، توضیح من در خصوص نظرم در مورد استفاده از هوش مصنوعی در آموزش و نحوه آزمونهایم سر کلاس و ... توضیحاتی را برایتان گفته ام.
⏱️ 00:17:32
#️⃣ #فایل_صوتی
🆔 t.me/AlirezaMojahedi
🌐 AlirezaMojahedi.com
بخشی از گفتگوی صوتی من با یکی از دوستان صمیمی همکلاسی دبستان که پزشکی است در انگلستان را اینجا هم درج میکنم.
بحث این بود که هوش مصنوعی باعث میشه نتونیم دانشجویان چینی رو خوب ارزیابی کنیم که نکنه از هوش مصنوعی استفاده کرده و تحقیقاتش الکی باشه یا نمراتش با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی بالا رفته باشه و امتحانات رو نباید اجازه بدیم اوپن بوک باشه و ... (در پذیرش دانشگاه دستی در آتش دارد)
پاسخ من برایش بسیار جالب بود و به فکر رف…
یک آگهی دعوت به همکاری دیگری را در لینکداین منتشر کرده ام.
این آگهی مربوط به دعوت از یک متخصص برای شبکه های اجتماعی است با عنوان دعوت به همکاری پروژهای
Social Media Content & Community Manager | AI Content Creator
علت فارسی بودن آگهی هم این است که دنبال فردی از داخل ایران میگردم ترجیحا ساکن تهران که شرکت در جلسات طوفان فکری برایش امکان پذیر باشد. برگزاری حضوری اینطور جلسات موثرتر از جلسات آنلاین بوده است.
امکان ارت…
ظاهرا وصول مالیات از تراکنشهای بانکی شروع شده است و از سال 1399 کلیه تراکنشهای همه حسابهای بانکی شما را جمع زده، 1 درصدش به عنوان درآمد محاسبه شده و 25 درصد درآمد محاسبه شده به عنوان مالیات برای شما ابلاغ خواهد شد.
حالا این تراکنشها برای جابجایی پول بوده، سود بانکی بوده، قرض بوده هر چی که بوده مهم نیست. با کارمندها هم بحث فایده نداره خودشون شاکی تر از من و شما هستند.
بعلاوه جریمه کتمان مالیات و جریمه دیرکرد پرداخت…
هر چه بیشتر در مدیریت و کسب و کار تجربه و مطالعه ام بیشتر شده، بیشتر متوجه شده ام که هیچ نظری قطعی نیست. در همه چیز میتوان شک کرد.
اگر کسی خیلی پا فشاری کرد، احتمالا هنوز مطالعه و دانشش کافی نیست.
🆔 t.me/AlirezaMojahedi
🌐 AlirezaMojahedi.com
«گزارش کامپیوتر»؛ روایت بیش از چهار دهه تحول دانش انفورماتیک در ایران
🔹 این شماره از مجموعه «کاوشی در گنجینه کتابخانه ملی ایران» به معرفی نشریه «گزارش کامپیوتر»، یکی از قدیمیترین و اثرگذارترین نشریات تخصصی رایانه و فناوری اطلاعات در ایران، اختصاص یافته است.
🔹 این نشریه از سال ۱۳۵۸ به همت انجمن انفورماتیک ایران منتشر شد و در دوره محدودبودن منابع فارسی، نقشی مهم در انتقال دانش کامپیوتر، معرفی فناوریهای نوین، بازتاب…
هنوز که هنوزه داریم کار میکنیم و به شرایط قبل نرسیدیم.
توسعه که پیشکش
حتی با این شرایط بعید میدونم بتونم به جیتکس ترکیه برسم. حتی اصلا معلوم نیست دوباره پروازها برقرار باشند یا نباشند، اینترنت داشته باشیم یا نداشته باشیم و ...
برای همین شاید عاقلانه ترین کار این باشه که فعلا تعهد خارج از آنچه بسیار ساده و روان میتونیم برقرار کنیم را بر عهده نگیرم. به عبارتی باید پایم را اندازه گلیمم دراز کنم.
باید این دوران را به آرا…
I will attend IGEXX ISTANBUL GLOBAL E-EXPORT SUMMIT 2026, Türkiye’s flagship e-export summit 🚀
I hope to meet you there and start and continue a good business partnership with you at www.eBiziner.com
For further information: www.igexx.com
📅 03–05 September 2026 | 📍 Istanbul Haliç Congress Center
🆔 t.me/AlirezaMojahedi
🌐 AlirezaMojahedi.com
از حالا دعوتهای کنفرانس تجارت الکترونیکی برلین شروع شده.
برای من هم یک دعوتنامه فرستادن که سخنرانی جدیدی ارائه کنم.
البته تاریخ توی این تصویر مربوط به پوستر سالی است که بار اول برای سخنرانی دعوت شدم با موضوع اهمیت رویکرد سیستمی در ایکامرس
امسال قراره در 17 تا 18 فوریه 2027 برگزار بشه
موضوع من مبتنی بر تجربیات اخیر و تاثیر مثبت الکترونیکی بودن کسب و کار و تجارت در حفظ جریان نقدینگی و بقا در بحرانهای شدیدی چون جنگ خوا…
ادامه از پست قبلی ... 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
داگلاس در هلند پیشتاز است، در حالی که گالاکسوس در سوئیس مقام اول را دارد.
Sephora، Notino، Flaconi، Boots، Lookfantastic، Primor، Druni، dm، ICI PARIS XL، Kruidvat، bol.، Deloox، Aroma Zone، Nocibé، El Corte Inglés، Vinted، Zalando، eBay، SHEIN، TikTok Shop همگی در بین پلتفرمهای برتر حداقل در یک بازار قرار دارند. ا
ین تنوع نشان میدهد که خرید محصولات زیبایی همچنان با اکوسیستمهای خردهف…
چشمانداز تجارت الکترونیکی صنعت زیبایی در اروپای غربی، چیزی فراتر از رهبری بازار را آشکار میکند
آخرین رتبهبندی پلتفرمهای تجارت الکترونیکی زیبایی در سراسر اروپای غربی، داستانی را روایت میکند که ظریفتر از سهم بازار به تنهایی است.
آمازون در هشت بازار از ده بازار تحت پوشش، جایگاه اول را در اختیار دارد، با این حال تصویر کلیتر نشان میدهد که زیبایی همچنان یکی از معدود دستههای خردهفروشی است که در آن مقیاس، به طور خ…
🔥1
Signed Alireza Mojahedi
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @alirezamojahedi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 960,960 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دکتر شیری @drshiri · 98,921 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
ترفند مدیریت @tarfandemodiriat · 98,841 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
دانشگاه بازاریابی @iranmarketinguniversity · 105,812 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
پادکست پلی لیست|Playlist @Playlistpodcas · 152,357 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“eBiz” (@alirezamojahedi), 2,151 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alirezamojahedi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.