Channel
@seo24
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,996subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001000258723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seo24 |
| Description | وب۲۴: طراح موفقیت کسب و کار 👤ارتباط با کارشناسان وب۲۴ جهت مشاوره و سفارش سئو و طراحی سایت حرفهای: 👇👇👇 @web24ir درخواست سئو و طراحی سایت 👇👇👇 www.web24.ir |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seo24 |
Recorded in 2019 as “سئو24 | وب24” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 4,996 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 4,999 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 5,002 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 5,002 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 October 2024 – 16 July 2026) |
| Views total | 519 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
166 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 43.4% | |
| 👍 | 58 | 34.9% | |
| 👎 | 33 | 19.9% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.20% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.602% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2024 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭕️ جمعآوری دادههای گزارش سئو تریبون شروع شد! مجموعه تریبون هر سال دادههای مرتبط با سئو را جمعآوری میکند و گزارش سالانه سئو را منتشر میکند. سال گذشته حدود سه ماه قطعی و اختلال اینترنت در ایران و وجود بحرانها و اتفاقات مختلف را داشتیم. سال ۴۰۴ سالی سخت و پرفشار برای همه فعالان حوزه آنلاین بود. مشارکت در جمعآوری دادههای این گزارش باعث خواهد شد که دید بهتری از فضای حاکم و روند اتفاقات پیش رو داشته باشیم. اگر …
❤1👍1
چطور بهترین نتیجه رو از سئو بگیریم؟ یکی از نگرانیهای همیشگی مدیرا اینه که آیا واقعا داره روی سئوی سایت من کار میشه؟ یا از کجا متوجه بشم منابعی که صرف کردیم باعث شده نتیجه بگیریم؟ آقای شیرازی تو این ویدیو به طور کامل به این سوالات پاسخ میدن. @seo24 --------------------------------------------- #سئو #شرکت_سئو
❤5👍1😁1
هر یک ثانیه تاخیر بالا اومدن سایت...؟! باعث میشه ۱۶٪ رضایت کاربر کمتر بشه و نهتنها تجربه خوبی رقم نمیخوره، بلکه سایت رو میبنده و دیگه هم برنمیگرده. سرعت سایت علاوهبر اینکه روی سئو خیلی مهم و موثره، حتی میتونه روی افزایش فروش شما هم تاثیر مستقیم بذاره. برای همین ما سعی میکنیم از همون ابتدا با رعایت نکات مربوط به پرفورمنس، عملکرد سایت شما رو طوری بهينه کنیم که سرعت خیلی خوبی داشته باشه. اگه شما هم یه سایت حرفهای…
👍4
چطور یه آژانس خوب سئو انتخاب کنیم؟ 🤔 ❓ اون که نتیجه میگیره یا اون که وعده میده؟ هنوز هم یکی از مهمترین و پرتکرارترین دغدغههای کارفرماها و مدیران اینه که چطور یه شرکت خوب سئو پیدا کنن تا بتونن خوب نتیجه بگیرن و هزینهشون سوخت نشه. تو این ویدیو آقای شیرازی بهتون میگن که برای انتخاب یه شرکت خوب سئو باید چه معیارهایی رو در نظر بگیرین. اگه شما هم موردی به ذهنتون میرسه میتونید تو کامنتها با ما در میون بذارید. @seo2…
👍3👎2
👈 استخدام کارشناس سئو برای پروژههای انگلیسی ما در تیم وب24 به یک همکار جدید نیاز داریم. شرایط احراز: ▫️حداقل 3 سال سابقه کار در حوزه سئو ▫️تسلط نسبی به زبان انگلیسی ▫️دارا بودن سابقه فعالیت بر روی سئو سایتهای انگلیسی خارج از ایران ▫️سن مورد نظر بین 22 تا 32 سال ▫️سکونت در تهران (محل شرکت محدوده میدان ونک) تواناییهای فنی: ▫️تسلط به سرچ کنسول گوگل و ابزارهای سئو ▫️تسلط کامل به سئو off page و on page ▫️تسلط به htm…
👎12❤1👍1
وبینار رایگان مرگ سئو یا فرصت رشد کسبوکارها با هوش مصنوعی؟💥 ✅ در این وبینار ویژه مدیران کسبوکار با روندهای جدید، تفاوت سئو سنتی و مدرن، مفهوم سئو جامعنگر، و تکنولوژیهای نوظهور مثل GEO، AEO و MEO آشنا شوید، تا در بازار رقابتی امروز، تصمیمهای دقیقتری برای آینده بگیرید. سرفصلها: - تاثیر هوش مصنوعی بر روند جستجوی کاربران - سئو سنتی و مدرن چه تفاوت هایی دارند - سئو جامعنگر چیست و چه انتظاراتی از سئو داشته باشیم…
❤4
🟢 برای سئو هزینه میکنیم یا سرمایهگذاری؟ —————— @seo24
👍3❤2
تو اوضاع الان بازار سئو رو رها کنیم یا نه؟✨️ 🎯 شما سئو رو از برنامه بازاریابیتون حذف کردید یا نه؟ —————— @seo24
👍4❤2😁1
🎯 هنر جنگ 📘 توصیههای مدیران برجسته ایران برای بقای کسبوکارها در روزهایی که هر تصمیم اشتباه، میتونه آخرین تصمیم یک کسبوکار باشه... در دورانی که زنده موندن خودش یه پیروزیه... این فایل راهنماییه برای همه مدیرانی که نمیخوان تسلیم بشن. برای اونایی که هنوز امید دارن، هنوز تیم دارن، و هنوز میخوان بجنگن! ———— @seo24
👍8❤1
با نهایت تأسف و تأثر، درگذشت سرکار خانم سروناز واعظزاده، از همکاران محترم مجموعه یکتانت را تسلیت عرض مینماییم. این ضایعه غمانگیز را به خانواده محترم ایشان و مجموعه یکتانت صمیمانه تسلیت گفته و برای بازماندگان محترم صبر و آرامش آرزو داریم. 🖤🙏
❤41
سلام به همه عزیزان امیدواریم که حال همگی خوب باشه، به دلیل شرایط به وجود آمده این وبینار فردا برگزار نخواهد شد و تاریخ جدید متعاقبا اعلام میشه🌿 به امید روزهای روشن 💛
❤7
خدمات سئو و طراحی سایت سئو۲۴ | وب۲۴ pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seo24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
لینکهای داخلی سایت در کدام بخش اعتبار بیشتری منتقل میکنند؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2024 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 803,694 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خدمات سئو و طراحی سایت سئو۲۴ | وب۲۴” (@seo24), 4,996 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seo24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.