Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,653–7,848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:21
7,825
+51
15 Sept 2026, 03:55
7,774
+32
11 Sept 2026, 13:16
7,742
+10
7 Sept 2026, 01:37
7,732
+8
2 Sept 2026, 17:07
7,724
+7
30 Aug 2026, 19:05
7,717
+7
27 Aug 2026, 17:35
7,710
+6
24 Aug 2026, 16:59
7,704
+1
21 Aug 2026, 00:02
7,703
+3
17 Aug 2026, 18:14
7,700
+12
14 Aug 2026, 16:38
7,688
+6
11 Aug 2026, 03:59
7,682
+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:42
7,681
+6
7 Aug 2026, 12:16
7,675
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:08
7,675
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4,578 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,229
48.7%
👍
1,237
27.0%
👏
558
12.2%
👎
311
6.79%
🤔
80
1.75%
🔥
66
1.44%
😍
54
1.18%
😁
43
0.939%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,578 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اگر عرف است که به کارگری مثلا ۵ هزار تومان انعام داده شود، دادن یک انعام ۱۰ هزار تومانی، شاید X واحد به ما فشار بیاورد. اما چون برای او تجربهای کم تکرار و نادر است (و به قول من، داستانی برای سفرهی شام آن خانواده میسازد) احتمالاً ۵X یا ۱۰X ذوق خواهد کرد و در آن لحظه، قدر مطلق خوشحالی در جهان بسیار بیشتر خواهد بود (تازه من در معادلات خودم، لذت گفتگوی شام و خوشحالی ایجاد شده برای خانواده را لحاظ نکردم و فقط هیجان و ت…
چند روز پیش، برای خرید یک محصول غذایی، به فروشگاهی رفتم و مرد فروشنده گفت این محصول را به جای ۳۰۰ هزار تومان، ۲۰۰ هزار تومان میدهم چون از تاریخ مصرف آن، فقط یک ماه مانده است و اگر این روزها فروش نرود، متضرر میشوم (من ده عدد از آن محصول لازم داشتم).
من به او توضیح دادم که من قصد دارم در همین هفته، آنها را مصرف میکنم و بنابراین، تاریخ انقضای آنها برای من محدودیتی ایجاد نمیکند. ضمناً اگر شما این تخفیف را نمیدادید …
من تقریباً تمام نوتیفیکیشنها رو در همه نرم افزارها قطع کردهام و برنامه زمان بندی ذهنی برای هر اپلیکیشن دارم. ضمن اینکه در روز طی یازده تا چهارده نوبت نیم ساعته، موبایل رو کامل سایلنت میکنم و کنار میگذارم و بعد از اینکه هدف مشخص در اون نیم ساعت محقق شد، اگر لازم بود، موبایل رو چک میکنم.
فکر میکنم حتی فوت نزدیکان رو هم میشه با چند ساعت تاخیر شنید. چیزی وجود نداره که اگر نیم ساعت یا یکساعت دیگر بشنوم، اتفاق عجیبی…
قسمت سوم
فایل صوتی یادگیری تطبیقی
اینکه از کمالگرایی فاصله گرفتم و راحت ضبط کردم، حس خوبی بهم داد. باعث شد وقت کمی ازم گرفته بشه و شوق و علاقهٔ بیشتری برای ضبط یادداشتهای صوتی بعدی داشته باشم. محمدرضا شعبانعلی
لینک پست متمم
تیر ۱۴۰۵
شاید یکی از ریشههای علاقه ما به داشتن فرزند این باشد که دوست داریم او حسرتهای ما را جبران کرده و آرزوهای نزیسته ما را زندگی کند.
حتی آن هنگام هم که روشنفکرانه او را در میان انتخابهای مختلف رها میکنیم تا آگاهانه و مختارانه انتخاب کند، هوشمندانه گزینهها را چنان محدود میکنیم که زمین بازیاش از افق دید اندیشه ما دورتر نباشد.
#محمدرضا_شعبانعلی
@shabanali_motamem
ما متأسفانه در فرهنگمون مرز بین ادبیات و اندیشهورزی رو جدی نمیگیریم.
بهخاطر همین، یه آدمی مثل مولوی رو هم که از نظر ادبی فاخر و از نظر قدرت اندیشه نازل هست (و مغزی بسیار ضعیف، باورهایی کهنه و ذهنی ناتوان از تحلیل و درک عالم داره) متأسفانه بهعنوان متفکر یا الگوی فکری تحلیل میکنیم. اگر نهایتاً «ادیب + معلم اخلاق» میدیدیمش (اونم اخلاق سنتی، در حدی که روی منبر می گن، نه اخلاقی با پیچیدگیهای امروزی که از درک بسیا…
وقتی یه نفر راجع به یه موضوعی حرف زد و نوبت شما شد، برای همدلی، از خودتون مثال نزنید. بلکه با سوال، دوباره توپ بحث رو پاس بدید به خود اون آدم.
این دو مکالمه رو نگاه کن:
مکالمهٔ اول
+ من دیروز سبزی نشُسته خوردم و تا صبح مجبور شدم هی برم دستشویی و بیام.
– آخ. آخ. میدونم چی میگی. منم چند وقت پیش اینطوری شدم. حتماً خیلی اذیت شدی.
مکالمهٔ دوم
+ من دیروز سبزی نشُسته خوردم و تا صبح مجبور شدم هی برم دستشویی.
– آخ.…
خیلی وقتها کاربرد یه چیزی رو هرگز نمیتونیم حدس بزنیم. فقط باید بذاریم توی مغزمون بشینه، تا به موقع، شاید روزها یا ماهها بعد یه جا به کارمون بیاد.
خیلی وقتها هم آموختههای ما توی مغزمون با سایر دانستهها و خاطرات و تجربیاتمون ترکیب میشن و یه جایی که اصلاً فکر نمیکنیم، یه ایده، راهحل، تحلیل و تفسیر رو برامون تداعی میکنن. به خاطر همین همیشه میگن خلاقیت، مال مغزهای پر هست و نه مغزهای خالی. این ژستهایی که بع…
برخی از نشانههای اعتیاد به تکنولوژی
هر لحظه صدای نوتیفیکیشن گوشیتان را میشنوید، بیاراده به سمت آن کشیده میشوید.
اگر نوتیفیکیشن یا پیغامی روی گوشی بیاید و نتوانید همان موقع آن را چک کنید، مضطرب میشوید.
وقتی نمیتوانید آنلاین شوید، علائم شبیه دوری از مواد مخدر را تجربه میکنید (مثلاً بیحوصلگی و تحریکپذیری بیشتر)
استفاده از ابزارهای مختلف تکنولوژی (از شبکه های اجتماعی و پیامرسانها تا ایمیل و یوتیوب) وق…
👍54❤20👎10👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shabanali_motamem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@shabanali_motamem named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@shabanali_motam named in 9 posts, 8 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دکتر آذرخش مکری @DrAzarakhshMokri · 201,418 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
گفت و چای | فهیم عطار @fahimattar · 43,042 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری | آرشیو @Dr_Azarakhsh_Mokri_Public_Files · 22,111 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
پادکست جافِكری @jafekri · 41,175 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
Mehrsasharoleslam @mehrsasharoleslam · 36,477 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊 @modiriran · 34,367 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
شبکه توسعه @I_D_Network · 38,829 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
مدیریت رفتار سازمانی @organizationalbehavior · 31,684 Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نشر و حفظ آثار محمدرضا شعبانعلی” (@shabanali_motamem), 7,825 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shabanali_motamem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
