Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

آکادمی مدیریت

@pmacademy

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

30,169subscribers

-126 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001009343778
TypeChannel
Username@pmacademy
Created29 September 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pmacademy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “آکادمی مدیریت حرفه ای — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@pmacademy/19850 · this entry2 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC@Digiikar/35653 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC0.9727 hours
@pmacademy/19843 · this entry9 Jun 2026, 11:18 UTC@Digiikar/356210 Jun 2026, 10:28 UTC0.9723 hours
@pmacademy/19844 · this entry12 Jun 2026, 11:58 UTC@Digiikar/356314 Jun 2026, 09:14 UTC0.9645 hours
@pmacademy/19861 · this entry19 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC@Digiikar/356821 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC0.9642 hours
@pmacademy/19870 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC@Digiikar/35691 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC0.949.0 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Digiikar5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9627 hoursthis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @pmacademy — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

29,32330,29529,8095 August 2026 — 30,295 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,295 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,206 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,156 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,479 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,323 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,271 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,205 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,169 subscribers30,1695 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,177–30,441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5530,169-36
11 Aug 2026, 21:5230,205-66
11 Aug 2026, 01:0230,271+948
9 Aug 2026, 23:3229,323-156
8 Aug 2026, 23:0129,479-677
7 Aug 2026, 19:3630,156-50
6 Aug 2026, 20:4730,206-89
6 Aug 2026, 01:5230,295no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0530,295first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.25%
avg views ÷ 30,169 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held24 (9 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total24,524
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC188 viewsread 12 August 2026

✅ 🤩⁣ نشانه‌های یک رئیس خوب 🔸رابرت ساتن، استاد دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه استنفورد، در مقاله خود به نام «چگونه در شرایط بد اقتصادی، رئیس خوبی باشیم؟» می‌نویسد: اگر بخواهیم رو راست باشیم، رئیس خوب بودن حتی در شرایط خوب اقتصادی هم سخت است، چه برسد به شرایط بد اقتصادی 🔹برای همین، تمرین «رئیس خوب بودن در شرایط بد اقتصادی»، تمرینی بسیار واجب برای هر مدیری است که می‌خواهد شرکتش شرایط بد اقتصادی را با موفقیت پشت سر بگذارد و در

12 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC267 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @parspajouhaan_industry

اگه مهندس صنایع هستی یا به این حوزه علاقمندی این کانال و از دست نده👇 📊اطلاع رسانی وبینارها و ورکشاپ های مهندسی صنایع 📊 معرفی و آموزش نرم‌افزارهای مهندسی صنایع 📊 منابع آموزشی و فایل‌های تخصصی صنایع 📊 مشاوره و همکاری در انجام پروژه‌های مهندسی 📊 اطلاع‌رسانی موقعیت‌های شغلی و فرصت‌های کاری #ارسال_دوستان @parspajouhaan_industry

10 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC589 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤩 «از چرا شروع کنید» چرا بعضی سازمان‌ها، مدیران و برندها می‌توانند دیگران را الهام ببخشند، درحالی‌که بسیاری از رقبا با وجود برخورداری از منابع، دانش و محصولات مشابه، چنین تأثیری ندارند؟ سایمون سینک در کتاب Start with Why توضیح می‌دهد که تفاوت اصلی در نقطه آغاز تفکر و ارتباطات آن‌هاست. بیشتر سازمان‌ها ابتدا درباره «چه چیزی» صحبت می‌کنند؛ یعنی محصول، خدمت یا نتیجه‌ای که ارائه می‌دهند. سپس توضیح می‌دهند «چگونه» این کا

10 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✨ وقت رونق کسب‌وکار شماست گاهی مشتری محصول موردنظر خود را انتخاب کرده، اما به‌دلیل محدودیت در پرداخت، خرید خود را به زمان دیگری موکول می‌کند یا از آن منصرف می‌شود. 🔹 خرید اعتباری تارا با افزایش قدرت خرید مشتریان، مسیر خرید را هموارتر می‌کند و فرصت بیشتری برای افزایش فروش و رشد کسب‌وکارها فراهم می‌کند. 📊 در حال حاضر، بیش از ۱۱ میلیون کاربر و ۲۳ هزار پذیرنده در شبکه تارا فعال هستند. 📌 شما هم می‌توانید با پیوستن به

8 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤩 مدیریت مبتنی بر نتیجه؛ به‌جای کنترل کارها، نتیجه را مدیریت کنید یکی از تغییرات مهم در مدیریت مدرن، حرکت از Activity-Based Management به سمت Outcome-Based Management است؛ یعنی به‌جای اینکه مدیر دائماً بررسی کند کارکنان «چه کاری انجام داده‌اند»، تمرکز اصلی روی این باشد که «چه نتیجه‌ای ایجاد شده است». در رویکرد سنتی، عملکرد اغلب با معیارهایی مثل تعداد جلسات، ساعت کار، تعداد گزارش‌ها یا میزان فعالیت افراد سنجیده می‌ش

8 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @management_advPhoto

🎓 ثبت‌نام دوره‌های MBA و DBA مؤسسه آموزش عالی بهار آغاز شد 🔴اگر می‌خواهید تصمیم‌های مدیریتی دقیق‌تر بگیرید، کسب‌وکار خود را حرفه‌ای‌تر مدیریت کنید و مهارت‌های مدیریتی خود را به سطح بالاتری برسانید، این دوره‌ها برای شما طراحی شده‌اند. ✅ برگزاری به صورت حضوری و آفلاین ✅ مدرک پایان‌دوره معتبر و قابل ترجمه رسمی ✅ شرایط پرداخت نقد و اقساط 📅 شروع دوره‌ها: مرداد و شهریورماه ۱۴۰۵ 🟠 برای دریافت اطلاعات کامل و ثبت‌نام، از

4 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤩 مدیریت منابع انسانی پس از بحران؛ بازسازی با تمرکز بر انسان پس از عبور از بحران، چالش‌های سازمان پایان نمی‌پذیرد؛ بلکه وارد مرحله‌ای حیاتی‌تر به‌نام بازسازی می‌شود. در این مرحله، نقش مدیریت منابع انسانی از همیشه پررنگ‌تر است. زیرا حالا باید نه‌تنها عملکرد سازمان بازیابی شود، بلکه روحیه، انگیزه و اعتماد کارکنان نیز احیا شود. 🔹 بازسازی اعتماد و ایجاد ثبات بحران‌ها اغلب همراه با استرس، نااطمینانی و فرسودگی ذهنی کارکن

3 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,950 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩 مدیریت استعداد (Talent Management)؛ فراتر از استخدام در بسیاری از سازمان‌ها، هنوز مدیریت استعداد با استخدام اشتباه گرفته می‌شود؛ در حالی که استخدام تنها یکی از مراحل این فرآیند است. مدیریت استعداد یک رویکرد استراتژیک برای جذب، توسعه، حفظ و مدیریت سرمایه انسانی است تا سازمان بتواند اهداف کسب‌وکار خود را محقق کند. مدیریت استعداد زمانی ارزش واقعی ایجاد می‌کند که بین استراتژی کسب‌وکار و استراتژی نیروی انسانی ارتباط ب

31 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤩 خودکارآمدی (Self-efficacy) خودکارآمدی (Self-efficacy) در محیط کار به معنای اعتقاد فرد به توانایی خود برای انجام وظایف خاص و مواجهه با چالش‌ها است. این مفهوم به تفکر فرد در مورد توانایی شخصی او برای مواجهه با موقعیت‌ها، حل مسائل، و دستیابی به اهداف مرتبط با شغل اشاره دارد. خودکارآمدی به عنوان یک ارزیابی از قدرت شخصی در مواجهه با چالش‌ها و دستیابی به موفقیت در کارهایی که انجام می‌دهد، مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. عنا

26 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC≈3,060 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤩 ⁣ افراد را مسئول دست یابی به اهدافشان بدانید اغلب مدیران برایشان آسان تر است که کاری را خودشان انجام دهند تا اینکه مسئولیتش را به کسی دیگری واگذارند. ✅اگر این مسئله در مورد شما صدق می کند، به پیشنهادهای زیر توجه کنید: 1⃣ مطمئن شوید افراد، اهدافی را که مسئول دست یافتن به آنها هستند را درک می کنند. 2⃣ برای هر هدف نتایج قابل سنجش تعیین کنید و عملکردهای قابل قبول و غیرقابل قبول را به بحث بگذارید. 3⃣ تفاوت بین مسئول

25 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈3,020 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤩 محیط‌های کاری سمی شده‌اند – توهم نیست! نظرسنجی جدیدی از شرکت Express و مؤسسه Harris نشان می‌دهد که رفتارهای خصمانه و تنش در محیط‌های کاری به شکل نگران‌کننده‌ای افزایش یافته است. بیش از ۳۰٪ از کارکنانی که به دنبال تغییر شغل هستند، گفته‌اند که محل کارشان نسبت به سه سال قبل پرتنش‌تر شده و روابط بین همکاران خصمانه‌تر شده است. 📌 حق با شماست؛ فضا تغییر کرده است. دیگر آن فضای آرام، صمیمی و روتین گذشته وجود ندارد. ۵۴٪ کا

22 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC≈3,000 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤩 تله‌های مدیریتی؛ دام‌هایی که حتی مدیران حرفه‌ای هم در آن گرفتار می‌شوند در دنیای مدیریت، اشتباهات همیشه از کمبود تجربه یا ضعف دانش نمی‌آیند. بسیاری از مدیران باتجربه هم در «تله‌های مدیریتی» گرفتار می‌شوند؛ دام‌هایی ذهنی و رفتاری که عملکرد تیم، سرعت تصمیم‌گیری و کیفیت نتایج را به شدت کاهش می‌دهد. شناخت این تله‌ها اولین قدم برای جلوگیری از افتادن در آنهاست. ۱) تله کنترل بیش‌ازحد (Micromanagement) مدیرانی که روی هر

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @pmacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 764,452 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آکادمی مدیریت” (@pmacademy), 30,169 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pmacademy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.