5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,759–1,772 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:15
1,760
-2
9 Aug 2026, 14:11
1,762
-6
6 Aug 2026, 17:30
1,768
-2
6 Aug 2026, 07:02
1,770
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:22
1,770
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 1,760 subscribers
Avg views / post
386
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.782%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (29 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
4,242
Reactions total
32
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
29s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
97 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
93
95.9%
👍
4
4.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ritual AMA 요약
Q1. Ritual은 어떤 블록체인이며, 왜 스스로를 ‘자율 지능을 위한 실험실’이라고 설명하나요?
A. Ritual이 풀려는 핵심은 더 좋은 AI 모델을 만드는 것보다 이미 강력해진 에이전트의 ‘자율성 격차’를 닫는 것입니다. 지금의 에이전트는 도구를 사용하고 서로 소통할 수 있지만, 대개 사용자가 노트북을 닫으면 함께 멈춥니다. Ritual은 에이전트가 온체인과 인터넷에서 계속 작동하고, 자산을 보유하며, 환경을 오가고, 자신의 컴퓨팅 자원을 선택하면서 사람이 매 단계 지켜보지 않아도 지속될 수 있는 레이어를 만드는 것을 목표로 합니다.
이를 위해 단순한 모델 개선이 아니라 암호학, 메커니즘 설계, 합의, 시스템 엔지니어링, 신뢰 실행 환경을 결합해야 한다는 입장입니다. 궁극적으로는 에이전트가 자신이 만든 가치…
🔴 Ritual x 코인같이투자 AMA
오늘 밤 10시, Ritual AMA가 진행됩니다!
🗓️장소 및 일시 : 8월 5일(화) 오후 10시 (KST) 코인같이투자 트위터
메인넷을 앞둔 Ritual의 최신 업데이트와 앞으로의 계획에 대해 이야기할 예정입니다.
많은 관심과 참여 부탁드립니다!
AMA 이벤트 공지
🔴 Ritual 커뮤니티
디스코드 l 트위터 l 사이트 l KR TG 공지방 l KR TG 채팅방
🔴 Public Testnet 종료 안내
메인넷 출시를 앞두고 Ritual Labs는 지난 몇 달간 체인 업데이트, 보안 감사 완료, 그리고 dApp 빌더들의 피드백 반영 작업을 진행해왔습니다.
이에 따라 퍼블릭 테스트넷은 앞으로 1~2일 내 종료될 예정입니다.
메인넷과 함께 새로운 소식들이 곧 공개될 예정이니 많은 기대 부탁드립니다.
🔴 Ritual 커뮤니티
디스코드 l 트위터 l 사이트 l KR TG 공지방 l KR TG 채팅방
🔴 PloPlo NFT 민팅 오픈
<화이트리스트 민팅>
7월23일 오전 00:55 - 7월24일 오전 00:55
<퍼블릭 민팅>
7월24일 오전 00:55 - 7월25일 오전 00:55
민팅링크
🔴 Ritual 커뮤니티
디스코드 l 트위터 l 사이트 l KR TG 공지방 l KR TG 채팅방
🔴 PloPlo 화이트리스트 체커 오픈
Ritual 생태계의 NFT인 PloPlo 화이트리스트 체커가 오픈되었습니다.
공식링크는 하나 뿐이니, 스캠링크에 주의하세요!
화이트리스트 체크 사이트
PloPlo 공식 트윗
🔴 Ritual 커뮤니티
디스코드 l 트위터 l 사이트 l KR TG 공지방 l KR TG 채팅방
🔴 PloPlo 민팅 일정
📝 화이트리스트 신청 마감: 7월 20일(월) 00:55
🔍 화이트리스트 당첨 확인: 7월 22일(수) 00:55
🎟️ 화이트리스트 민팅: 7월 23일(목) 00:55 ~ 7월 24일(금) 00:54
🌍 퍼블릭 민팅: 7월 24일(금) 00:55 ~ 7월 26일(일) 00:54
초기 PloPlo 홀더가 될 기회를 놓치지 마세요.
화이트리스트 신청 폼
🔴 Ritual 커뮤니티
디스코드 l 트위터 l 사이트 l KR TG 공지방 l KR TG 채팅방
🔴 Ritual 사칭스캠 주의🚨
최근 많이 보이는 PloPlo NFT 민팅 관련 스캠에 주의하시길 바랍니다.
(해당 사진은 스캠입니다)
반드시 Ritual 공식 계정인지 확인하시길 바랍니다!
🔴 Ritual 커뮤니티
디스코드 l 트위터 l 사이트 l KR TG 공지방 l KR TG 채팅방
리츄얼 생태계 PloPlo의 첫 컬렉션 ET-Friends-001 WL 획득 경로가 추가
✅ 이미 WL 확정 — 따로 할 것 없음
- Ritual Genesis 1000 대상자
- 채널별 이벤트를 통해 WL에 당첨된 분
✅ 조건 충족자 — 신청 필요
아래 조건에 해당하면 디스코드·지갑 계정을 맞춰 신청서를 제출해야 합니다.
- PloPlo Discord의 PloPlo Pioneer Ab Role 보유
- Ritual Discord의 Ritualist, Ritty, Radiant Ritualist Role 보유
- 공식 Quest 캠페인 완료
✅ 기존 조건이 없어도 WL 도전 가능
아래 활동 내역을 구글폼으로 제출하면 심사를 거쳐 WL을 받을 수 있습니다.
- X에 PloPlo·Siggy·Ritual 관련 고품질 콘텐츠 작성
- Plo…
🔥 PloPlo AMA 현장 이벤트
오늘밤 9시 진행되는 리추얼 메인넷에 배포될 AI 컴패니언 PloPlo와의 AMA !! 현재 많은 한국 커뮤니티에서 WL 배포가 진행중인데요.
저도 오늘 AMA 참여자를 대상으로 WL를 배포하도록 하겠습니다!
🗂 가이드
: 현장 스트리밍 링크 Like RT (곧 공개)
: AMA 청취 후 인증샷 해당 그룹에 공유
: 네이버폼 작성
리워드 - PloPlo WL 30개 및 커피 기프티콘 200개
WL의 경우 오늘중으로 모든 당첨자를 선발할 예정이라 빠르게 결판을 낼 예정이니 참고! 리추얼과 PloPlo 가보자고!
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RitualKorea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 284,210 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ritual Korea 공지” (@RitualKorea), 1,760 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RitualKorea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.