https://m.blog.naver.com/engineerinvestor/224349448356

Channel
30대에 퇴학당했다 살아돌아온 불불(🔥,🔥)
@bulbul2cryptoDAO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,913subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002029164160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bulbul2cryptoDAO |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bulbul2cryptoDAO |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 1,913 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 1,917 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,918 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 1,918 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.1%
- avg views ÷ 1,913 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 192
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 June 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 577 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
AI Agent한테 '해줘' 하니까 제법 많은걸 해주네요. 근데 AI라고 신처럼 알아서 다해주는건 아니고, 멍청한데 밤새도록 열일하는 알바생 뽑은거랑 비슷해서, 내가 명령을 잘 내려줘야 그거에 맞춰서 밤새도록 일함.
AI 에이전트끼리 포켓몬 TCG 배틀을 하게 해서 자동 매칭하고 순위메기는 Kaggle 대회중인데 이거 상금이 되게 크네요... 8등 안에 들어서 본선진출하면 전원 상금 3만불인데, 현재 의문의 한국인이 시뮬레이션 순위 7위중... 박강찬이라는 이름의 이 칸코쿠진은 실제론 포켓몬 카드게임 해본적도 없고 룰도 잘 모른다고 합니다. 😊😊 이말인즉슨 순수 AI 깎는 실력으로 본선 순위권에 들어갔다는 이야기죠 광대로 아는 사람이 많지만 사실 그 정체는 정말 똑똑한 젊은이... https://t.me/chanbobindustry/540 https://t.me/chanbobindustry/541
이더리움에 뭐 먹거리라도 생겼나요? 특히 Base랑 Solana에서 유출이 몇천억원이 빠져나왔네.
진짜 이건 좀 너무 슬프고 화가난다.. 코인충이 주식 기웃거리자 마자 미끄럼틀 당첨 나는 상승장 냄새도 못 맡았는데..
스테이블 코인이 무려 5b 빠져나감. 요 며칠 올랐던 코인들 고점에 개미들한테 죄다 떠넘기고 유유히 출금한게 아닐까 싶음 그 돈은 부동산이나 주식으로 가겠지, 다시 코인 사줄리는 없을듯 싶음...
👏3❤1
GRVT, 7월 21일 TGE 원문
🔥1
갑자기 USDC USDT 대출 이율이 소폭 상승했습니다. 누군가 대출받아서 단기적으로 알트코인 순환매를 만들려는 것 아닌가 하는, 느낌적인 느낌. 다만 전체 스테이블코인 공급은 여전히 하락세. 신규 자금이 코인판으로 들어오기는 커녕, 계속 빠져나가기만 하고있으니, 우리가 기다리던 대불장은 아직 조금 멀어 보이고, 이번 움직임도 개미들을 다시 꼬시기 위한 단기 반등쇼일 가능성이 높아보입니다. 제 전략은 비트코인 대비 상대강도가 높은 알트코인들이 과하게 튀어 오르면 분할로 숏을 모아갈 예정입니다. $HYPE, $LIT 제외. 반도체는 급등 이후 외국인/기관의 리밸런싱과 차익실현이 겹치면서 조정을 받은 것 같은데, 언제쯤 올라줄려나... 실적과 장기적인 투자 논리가 깨진것은 아니기 때문에 이악물고 버텨볼 생각입니다.
🔥2
이게 보호하려고 밀친걸로 보이는 사람들도 있음? 레알? 진심?
Altura 관련해서 자금 횡령 및 사기 의혹이 있네요. 자금의 래핑 및 트론 이동 - 사용자가 예치한 자금 중 일부는 크라켄 거래소로 입금. (약 2,500만 달러 이상) - 프로젝트 측은 이 자금으로 실물 금을 산다고 주장했으나, 온체인 데이터 확인 결과 크라켄 입금 후 몇 분 만에 거의 동일한 액수의 USDT가 트론(Tron) 지갑으로 출금. - 이 트론 자금들은 MEXC, Matrixport 등 다른 거래소로 분산되거나 고위험 채널 및 제재 대상 기업(HTX 등)으로 흘러 들어감. 허위 준비금 증명 (Proof of Reserves) - 알투라의 COO가 설립한 Aurellion Labs를 통해 검증 가능한 준비금을 가지고 있다고 주장. - 그러나 추적 결과, 자금이 크라켄 → Crypto.com → 아우렐리온 지갑 → 크라켄…
비트코인 = 잉여 전기의 저금통 형태 라고 생각했었음. 남는 전력을 써서 채굴하고, 그 전기가 비트코인이라는 형태로 저장되는 구조. 그런데 지금은 똑같이 엄청난 전기를 소비하면서도, 훨씬 더 생산적인 무언가가 등장했다. AI 예전에는 전기를 비트코인이라는 용기에 담았다면, 지금은 전기를 반도체라는 훨씬 정교한 용기에 담는다. 그리고 그 반도체는 단순히 가치만 저장하는 게 아니라, 추론을 하고, 서비스를 만들고, 실제 매출과 이익까지 발생시킨다. 그렇다면 굳이 구형 용기에 전기를 담아둘 이유가 있을까. 더 생산적이고, 현금흐름까지 만들어내는 신형 용기에 담는 편이 낫지 않을까. 언젠가는 하이닉스 같은 주식을 AAVE에 예치하고, 그걸 담보로 USDT를 대출받는 날이 올지도 모른다. 고수들은 이런 흐름을 진작 보고 비트 팔고, 반도…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bulbul2cryptoDAO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“30대에 퇴학당했다 살아돌아온 불불(🔥,🔥)” (@bulbul2cryptoDAO), 1,913 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bulbul2cryptoDAO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.