3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,933–2,939 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 04:51
2,934
-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:53
2,937
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
2,938
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
75.7%
avg views ÷ 2,934 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held
17 (13 June 2026 – 20 July 2026)
Views total
6,659
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
52 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
24
46.2%
❤
23
44.2%
👍
5
9.62%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
베이스의 마지막 한방은 결국 $BASE 에어드랍일 텐데,
이건 클래리티 통과 이후에나 가능한 그림이겠지.
(상장사의 토큰 발행 관련)
그 사이 로빈후드는 주식에서 다져온 유통망을 그대로 들고 들어와서,
크립토를 억지로 뒤집으려 하지 않고 있는 그대로 흡수하는 것처럼 보인다.
경쟁사들이 잘한 걸 부끄러워하지 않고 그대로 가져다 쓰는 패스트 팔로워 전략 같다.
RWA 브랜딩으로 밈과 선을 그으려 했지만,
결국 두 마리 늑대 짤 올리면서 커뮤니티랑 타협했지.
자기 고집보다 리테일이 먼저인 회사라는 게 저 한 장에서 드러난 거라고 본다.
캐시캣도 결국 후드에 상장하지 않을까.
또 로빈후드 펀드가 어떤 프로젝트를 투자하는지
그리고 그 신호에 맞춰 디젠들이 얼마나 빠르게 붙는지가
관전 포인트가 될 것 같다.
내가 이걸 이렇게까지 지켜보는 이유는,…
Base체인 헤드가 바뀝니다
jesse -> cobie
Jesse Pollak이 Baseapp을 떠납니다 어제 암스트롱이 베이스앱이 완전 잘못됐고, 트레이딩앱으로 전환된다고 말한 다음날이네요.
코비의 첫 행보는 베이스내에서 주목해볼만 한 것 같습니다. 과연 빌더 중심의 챙겨주기 체인에서 벗어날 수 있을지? 재밌는 시도가 나오는 원래의 Base로 돌아갈 수 있을지 기대해봅니다.
https://x.com/jessepollak/status/2077427261586997745
코인베이스 CEO 브라이언 암스트롱이 베이스의 콘텐츠 코인에 대해 "엉망이 됐다"고 인정했습니다.
코인베이스 CEO 브라이언 암스트롱은 베이스의 과거 콘텐츠 코인 이니셔티브에 대한 커뮤니티 비판을 인정하며 "잘 되지 않았다... 우리는 잘못했다. 새로운 전환점으로 나아가야 한다"고 말했습니다. 암스트롱은 베이스가 올해 초 이미 콘텐츠 코인에서 방향을 전환했다고 덧붙였습니다. 그는 현재 베이스가 거래, 결제 및 AI 에이전트에 집중하고 있으며, 대부분의 자원이 거래 인프라에 할당되고 있다고 말했습니다.
이러한 발언은 커뮤니티 구성원들이 이전에 조라(Zora)와 창작자 코인과 같은 이니셔티브를 홍보한 베이스를 비판한 후 나왔으며, 일부 실험이 지속적인 사용자 밧줄을 구축하는 데 실패하고 사용자에게 손실을 초래했다고 주장했습니다. — 링크
베이스 채널이지만 방금 Robinhood chain - Lighter $CASHCAT 리스팅과 통합성 보고 놀랐어요.
오늘 로빈후드 체인이 CEO 샤라웃까지 받으면서 개떡상을 하고 Base체인의 볼륨 1/3까지 올라간 상황인데요.
사실 이건 데이터가 축적되지 않았기에 단기적인 현상일 가능성이 크죠.
헌데, $CASHCAT이 오늘 20배가 상승하면서 개떡상을 한 당일에 Robinhood의 직접 투자를 받고, 체인과 지갑에서 perp엔진으로 작동하는 perpdex인 Lighter가 $CASHCAT perp를 robinhoodchain 버전의 라이터에 직상장을 꽂는 걸 보고 생각보다 치밀한 플레이를 계획한 걸수도 있겠다는 생각이 들고 있습니다.
$LIT의 가격 상승과 파트너쉽 발표도 최근에 이루어졌고, 시간적 정렬이 너무 빠르게 잘됐다고 느껴…
베이스 새로운 토큰 스탠다드인 B20은 7월 9일 새벽3시에 출시됨
조금 풀어보자면 B20은 Base체인에서 토큰을 발행하는 새로운 표준임. 기존 ERC-20과 호환됨
타겟하는 범위는 스테이블코인, RWA, 토큰화 주식, 결제 토큰, 규제형 자산 발행에 초점을 맞춰놨고 역할 권한과 공급량 제한, pause, permit등을 체인 레벨에서 제어가능하도록 만들어둔 규제레벨을 타겟한 표준임
로빈후드처럼 B20을 활용한 첫번째 밈코인 발행 가능성도 있으니 지켜보긴 해야겠지만 큰 목적은 이제 Base에서도 독립적인 움직임으로 규제 토큰화를 진행한다는 것이 핵심
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Farcasterkor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,020,255 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Base & Farcaster diving” (@Farcasterkor), 2,934 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Farcasterkor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
