Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 25 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Hobaba7 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,792–61,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 16:38
61,317
+38
9 Nov 2026, 20:57
61,279
+91
8 Nov 2026, 09:21
61,188
+3
7 Nov 2026, 04:38
61,185
-6
6 Nov 2026, 05:35
61,191
+17
5 Nov 2026, 01:17
61,174
+27
4 Nov 2026, 02:29
61,147
-6
3 Nov 2026, 04:18
61,153
+96
2 Nov 2026, 06:00
61,057
+4
1 Nov 2026, 04:08
61,053
+3
31 Oct 2026, 04:56
61,050
+19
30 Oct 2026, 01:37
61,031
+15
29 Oct 2026, 03:07
61,016
+6
27 Oct 2026, 22:19
61,010
+32
26 Oct 2026, 21:45
60,978
+88
25 Oct 2026, 19:38
60,890
+11
24 Oct 2026, 18:25
60,879
-4
23 Oct 2026, 21:29
60,883
+5
22 Oct 2026, 23:19
60,878
+14
21 Oct 2026, 21:34
60,864
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 57 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
قابلني اليوم دعاء يقول:
«لا غيَّب الله أحبابنا، ولا أذهب عوافينا، ولا أغفل قلوبنا عن الإحساس بما أنعم به علينا، ولا صغَّر في أعيننا نعمةً ولا كبّر في أعيننا مفقودًا»
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @Hobaba7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @Hobaba7 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
6.1 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قَبَسٌ• @qabs97 · 35,415 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
مَلاذُ الشُعَرَاء @Malaz_Alsh3raa · 51,625 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
بلاغةٌ. @Balaghaton · 53,517 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
ألِف @aleff1 · 52,372 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
ماجدولين @Majdolin2023 · 27,443 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
ضَيّ @Daii2020 · 81,601 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
ثرثرات ♡ @sarsrt · 49,507 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
تراث الأدب العربيّ @toratheladabelarabi · 36,577 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
المجاز @Almgaz · 29,266 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
بَليغٌ @balighoun9 · 87,701 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
ممّا قَرَأتُ : 📚 @readrr · 50,167 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
أَرِيبٌ. @areeb5 · 19,884 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
أبلِغ لِغرناطة السلام. 𓂆 @Granada93 · 31,664 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
زَيْنَبْ مُحَمَّدْ إِبْرَاهِيم..𐚁̸ @jou_zeinabmohamedibrahim · 32,392 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
المباح من الكلام-د.شيماءمشرف @Mobahalkalam · 34,047 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
إِسْلَام مَنْصُوْر @eslammansourr · 22,696 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
مركز البسمة الشبابي|غزة🇵🇸 @albasma1ps · 21,334 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
أَدِيبْ 💛 @adeeb82 · 47,436 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
وَذَكِّر @wazaker73 · 22,353 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026
قناة طلال المعضادي @elmeadadi1 · 23,503 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 September 2026
عصير الكتب @book_juice · 91,921 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
ظِلُ القَمر°•♥️ @moon_5w · 54,561 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
• حَرْفٌ | 🌸 @haref2 · 33,946 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
أَصْحَابُ السَّحَابْ | فُصْحَىٰ @alsahab9 · 30,927 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حُبَابَة•” (@Hobaba7), 61,317 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hobaba7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
