Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 125,017–126,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 18:39
125,931
+175
5 Nov 2026, 20:36
125,756
+3
4 Nov 2026, 19:29
125,753
+28
3 Nov 2026, 20:17
125,725
+145
2 Nov 2026, 17:59
125,580
+76
1 Nov 2026, 18:48
125,504
+2
31 Oct 2026, 17:46
125,502
+62
30 Oct 2026, 18:50
125,440
-20
29 Oct 2026, 19:21
125,460
+5
28 Oct 2026, 17:11
125,455
-8
27 Oct 2026, 17:56
125,463
+3
26 Oct 2026, 14:49
125,460
+52
25 Oct 2026, 11:37
125,408
+9
24 Oct 2026, 09:46
125,399
+15
23 Oct 2026, 07:09
125,384
-4
22 Oct 2026, 08:29
125,388
-21
21 Oct 2026, 01:06
125,409
-21
20 Oct 2026, 02:56
125,430
+24
19 Oct 2026, 01:10
125,406
+17
17 Oct 2026, 23:38
125,389
first reading
Engagement
223 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 125,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,200
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 223 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
223 (28 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
1,285,000
Reactions total
55,502
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 21:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
597
Videos
308
Links
527
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
10m 56s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
199,238 reactions across 221 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
148,432
74.5%
😭
16,896
8.48%
💔
8,767
4.40%
🔥
7,197
3.61%
😢
4,383
2.20%
💯
3,591
1.80%
👍
3,384
1.70%
👏
2,684
1.35%
🤩
1,668
0.837%
😍
1,225
0.615%
😁
1,011
0.507%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 223 of the 223 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202,169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 51 posts held from the last 30 days (25.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
أن تتغيّر صعب، لكنّه ليس بالمستحيل..
لا يخاف الإنسان أحيانًا من فكرة التغيير بحد ذاتها، إنّما يَهاب الفترة التي يجب أن يقضيها ليتغيّر، هذا الوقت هو ما يشكّل حاجزًا عنده، وإلّا فالبداية سهلة، لكن أن تستمرّ علىٰ ما بدأت، وتُطيل النَّفَس حتّى تبلغ الغاية؛ هنا التّحدّي الحقيقي
فحين تَتَحمّس لفكرةٍ تُريدها، لا تَنظر كم من الوقت تحتاج، بل كم من الوقت تستطيعه لها، فنَظرَتُك لِقُدرتك وسَقف الممكن عندك؛ أهمّ بألف مرّة من اس…
مَن قال لك أنّا لا تَتَحرَّق دواخلنا!..
لَم تَرَ تلك الأيّام التي مَشَينا فيها آلاف الشّوارع وقَطَعنا الأميالَ وبَلَغنا من السّير أنّا لا نَشعُرُ بأجسادنا، كأنّما هي خشبة عليها إتمام المسير دون ألَم، لشِدّته لا نشعر به، ولكَثرته لَم نَعُد نُعِدّه، ولأُلفَتِهِ صِرنا نسأل عنه، لَم تَرَ كم ألف كلمةٍ كَتَبنا بالدّم نُحاوِل بأسًا تخفيف ما فينا..
لَم تَرَ كم ليلةٍ امتَدّت بنا؛ حتّى صارَت أسبوعًا وشهرًا وسنة! كم دمعةٍ تحو…
المتتبع للأحداث يعلم أنّ الفِتَن تحومُ بها أيّامنا، والأحداث المتسارعة تحتاج ايمانًا يُثبّت على الإنسان قلبه ودينه، فالله الله بالدّين والوَعي والعِلم والفهم
رَحِم الله شهيدًا جَوادًا، دافَعَ عن وطنه ثابتًا في مكانه، وأنزل الصّبر على ذويه، وكَفّ الله أيدي العابثين الفاسدين، أولئك الذين لا يفتأون يُشعلون الفِتَن في كلّ اتّجاه.
الذي يكتب بِقَلبِه، لا بُدّ أن يقرأ قلبَه، ولا قراءة لمن لا هدوء عنده، اللحظة التي نسترقها بعيدًا عن كلّ شيء، هي كلّ شيء، إذ أنّ الحرف له هَيبَتُه، لا يُحِبّ المُزاحَمة، نُكرمه بالبُعد عن غيره؛ فَيَتَدَفّق 🌱
بقلبي يقين..
إنّا لو صَدَقنا الله في أعمالنا وخُطانا؛ لرأينا الفتح واضحًا في كلّ تفصيل، ولكانَ للطّمأنينة معنًى مختلفًا في قلوبنا، وكان الهدوء طاغيًا على القلق! نحن أُشبِعنا قلقًا من كلّ شيء، نَخاف من قادمٍ مجهول الملامح، نتوتّر قبول حدوث الشيء دائمًا، نَحسِب للخطوة ألف حساب، ونَقلَق!
«لَوْ أَنَّكُمْ تَتَوَكَّلُونَ عَلَى اللَّهِ حَقَّ تَوَكُّلِهِ لَرَزَقَكُمْ كَمَا يَرْزُقُ الطَّيْرَ؛ تَغْدُو خِمَاصًا، وَتَرُوحُ بِ…
الشّباب ذكورًا وإناثًا..
الّي بيصنعوا فيديوهات على إنستغرام، انتوا عم تعملوا تغذية بصرية ممتعة جدًا، ومفيدة ومُلهِمة لكثير من النّاس، الأثر خلف الكواليس أكبر ممّا بتتصَوّروا، كلّ تعب في اللّقطات والمونتاج والإضافات والأفكار بيستحقّ والله،
لذلك لا تحرمونا صناعة محتوى مدهش هادف! يجعل المشاهد يعيد اللقطة ألف مرّة، واتعبوا عادي، ولو ما كان في كثير مشاهدات، بكفينا قلب واحد يتأثّر ويستقيم، وأحيانًا تكفي البساطة لإيصال ال…
اسمعوني جيدًا، احفظوا هذه الرّسالة عندكم، وأرسلوها لكلّ من تُحِبُون الخير له..
كلّ صاحب غرس، كلّ صاحب أثر، كلّ محاولٍ في الطّريق، أكان مُرَبّيًا، معلّمًا، مُصلِحًا، مُشرِفًا، صاحب مشروع، جندي خَفِيّ، أمير في الظّل! يصنع محتوًى هادفًا، يكتب بخَطٍّ جميل، يتكلّم بطريقةٍ محترفة، يصنع إطارًا بصريًا مدهشًا، يُصوّر، يُمَنتِج، يَكتُب، يَنشُر، يقرأ … إلى آخره.
اثبتوا على ثغوركم، خذوها بقوّة، يكفي الأخذ الضّعيف، يكفي حماسة ا…
❤1,350😭98🔥50👍48👏23💯11🤩8💔7
Showing the 12 most recent of 223 posts we hold for @QusayAlosaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@QusayAlosaily edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
4 September 2026
Most recent edit
4 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @QusayAlosaily as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 193 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أسماء|asma @as_maabdo · 19,059 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
إِسْلَام مَنْصُوْر @eslammansourr · 22,659 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
الساخر الهادف - Ibrahem Emam @eipo0o · 25,942 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
قناة القارئ أحمد النفيس @ahmad_alnufais · 67,430 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
طَاقَةُ بِالمُوجَب - الرسمية @Taqat_bialmujab · 67,529 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
نافع | Nafe3 @Nafae3 · 104,757 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
أَكادِيمِية رَوْضَةُ القُرآنِ @Qoraan2024 · 20,246 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
خالد أبوشادي @khaledabushadi · 28,724 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
روح وريحان 🦋 @Omarmokhtar2002 · 30,043 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 6 September 2026
بالقُرآنِ نَحيا @quraanna7ya · 31,898 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
حَدثني عن الله @rn963 · 46,649 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
مسجد أحمد أبو أحمد @MsjdAboAhmed · 227,560 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
مركز آيات @ayatqurancenter · 323,941 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
محمد عبد اللطيف @MHAbdellatif · 20,670 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
حــــنـــان فـــــؤاد @HananFoad · 24,456 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
قناة تسنيم راجح @TassneemRajehChannel · 41,865 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
فِطرَة @fetra20 · 50,383 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
حنان محمود لاشين @HananLachine · 116,805 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
رَوْضَةُ الأَدَبِ @Rawwda · 233,014 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
صوتيات د. خالد أبوشادي 🔊 @khaledabushadii · 35,118 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
أنتَ تستَطِيع _ 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒂𝒏. @You_Can21 · 39,461 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
د.أحمد العربي - القناة الرسمية @Ahmed_Elaraby · 178,527 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
بلاغةٌ. @Balaghaton · 53,543 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
جهاد حلس @jhelles · 86,952 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 177 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة قُصَيّ عاصِم العُسَيلي” (@QusayAlosaily), 125,931 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QusayAlosaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
