Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 95 days, net +316. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,061–25,662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 14:48
25,448
+12
7 Nov 2026, 04:07
25,436
-4
6 Nov 2026, 05:18
25,440
-10
5 Nov 2026, 02:49
25,450
-22
3 Nov 2026, 23:40
25,472
-14
2 Nov 2026, 20:09
25,486
-1
1 Nov 2026, 17:01
25,487
-11
31 Oct 2026, 19:09
25,498
+2
30 Oct 2026, 21:05
25,496
+14
29 Oct 2026, 23:29
25,482
-13
29 Oct 2026, 01:08
25,495
-2
28 Oct 2026, 01:40
25,497
-6
26 Oct 2026, 05:20
25,503
+3
25 Oct 2026, 01:47
25,500
-11
24 Oct 2026, 02:17
25,511
+1
23 Oct 2026, 00:21
25,510
-23
21 Oct 2026, 19:49
25,533
-5
20 Oct 2026, 11:56
25,538
-8
19 Oct 2026, 08:36
25,546
-22
18 Oct 2026, 09:28
25,568
first reading
Engagement
183 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.38%
avg views ÷ 25,448 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 183 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
183 (1 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
142,894
Reactions total
5,460
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,510
Videos
≈309
Links
≈783
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
24m 11s
Average length
1m 03s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,282 reactions across 166 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,503
66.5%
❤🔥
1,793
12.6%
😢
1,144
8.01%
💯
876
6.13%
😁
409
2.86%
⚡
227
1.59%
👏
207
1.45%
🤔
123
0.861%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 166 of the 183 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 183 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 166 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maymanaplatform. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 183 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 71 posts held from the last 30 days (18.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
يقول حبيبنا ﷺ: "تَرى المُؤمِنينَ في تَراحُمِهم وتَوادِّهم وتَعاطُفِهم كمَثَلِ الجَسَدِ، إذا اشتَكى عُضوًا تَداعى له سائِرُ جَسَدِه بالسَّهَرِ والحُمَّى."
-صحيح البخاري.
فهل نحن نتداعى أم نتعامى؟
هل نسهر عملًا ودعاءً وبذلًا، أم نسهر غفلة وذنبًا ولهوًا؟
انظر فيما أنت فيه، ثم اسأل نفسك هل أنت فعلًا عضو من جسد الأمة؟
#أين_الربان
ما بين الخيال والحقيقة:
بطانية جافة 🛌 وخيمة تغرق بللًا! ⛺️
أنت تتخيل 💭 ولكنّ إخوانك بالنسبة لهم هذا ليس بخيال! 💔
فهلّا استنصرت لهم وجـ،ْـاهدت بمالك، لتنال أجر هذا النوع من الجهـ؛ـاد وأنت من مكانك؟
#أين_الربان؟
#إيواء_عاجل_لغزة
#عين_على_الواقع
🌒 ميمنة | مصلحون يحيون منهاج النبوة
منصاتنا على مواقع التواصل: https://linktr.ee/maymanaplatform
المكتب الإعلامي الحكومي في غزّة:
🔴غرق 70 ألف خيمة خلال 12 ساعة، والدفاع المدني يتلقى أكثر من 1500 نداء استغاثة!!
#️⃣ وما نزال نسأل متى نتحرك؟ وماذا أفعل؟
ألم نتعب من الأسئلة؟
إبحث الآن عن الجهات الموثوقة لتبدأ واجب الإنفاق! 🔴
#أين_الربان
#إيواء_عاجل_لغزة
تريد أن تستجيب كما استجاب ولبّى وسارع الصحابة للنبي ﷺ حينما أمرهم بالنفقة لإخوانهم المحتاجين؟
الآن الآن فرصتك لإثبات حبك وصدقك!♥️
#إيواء_عاجل_لغزة
🌒 ميمنة | مصلحون يحيون منهاج النبوة
منصاتنا على مواقع التواصل: https://linktr.ee/maymanaplatform
هل المبلغ الصغير الذي بين يديك يجعلك تتردد وتتساءل: هل سينفع ذلك؟
نحب أن نطمئنك أنه بصدقك قد تسبق من هم أكثر منك! 🌱
#إيواء_عاجل_لغزة
🌒 ميمنة | مصلحون يحيون منهاج النبوة
منصاتنا على مواقع التواصل: https://linktr.ee/maymanaplatform
كم مرة سمعنا جملة: "أنا مجرد عبد مأمور!"؟
هل يمكن للمصمم أن يصمم رسالة هدّامة ويقول أنا مجرد مصمم؟ 😮
أو يقدّم المعلم درسًا يعرض فيه ما لا يرضي الله ويقول لست أنا من وضع المنهج! 🫤
هل هذه فعلا أعذار حقيقية؟! تابعوا المنشور لتعرفوا. 🔥
💬وأخبرونا عن قصص أخرى سمعتم
فيها نفس الجملة، نتوق لسماعها!
🌒 ميمنة | مصلحون يحيون منهاج النبوة
منصاتنا على مواقع التواصل: https://linktr.ee/maymanaplatform
❤76💯12😢3⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 183 posts we hold for @maymanaplatform. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@maymanaplatform edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @maymanaplatform as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
5 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ما أكثر ما يعوقك عن تحويل مهاراتك وخبراتك إلى عمل ملموس تنفع به الأمة؟
😞 لا أعرف من أين أبدأ48%
🤔 أمتلك أكثر من مهارة، ولا أعلم ما الأهم منهم26%
😐 بحثت طويلا ولكن أحتاج إلى من يرشدني35%
😵💫 أحتاج أن أرتب أولوياتي37%
🫠 أبدأ ثم يصعب عليّ الاستمرار بسبب العوائق الخارجية32%
آخر (اكتب في التعليقات)4%
The shares total 182%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
لا قدّر الله كُتب عليك عملية جراحية، ولكن الطبيب أمهر طبيب في العالم! هل ستطمئن معه؟
سأسلمه كل شيء، ولن أحتاج أن أسأل عن أي شيء! 😌4%
سأسلمه ولكن بحذر، في النهاية هو بشر!🫢70%
هه! لن أطمئن حتى أخرج من المستشفى 😐35%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
لو كان عندك قضية صعبة ووكلتها لأشطر محامٍ في بلدك، هل ستنام مرتاحًا؟
نعم، سأنام ملء عياني ليلتها!🥱9%
سأرتاح قليلًا، ولكن سيبقى بداخلي بعض القلق.😕50%
لن أرتاح إلا بانتهاء القضية! 😓49%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 183 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قناة أحمد بن خالد الهاجري @Ahmadhajry · 21,166 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
العمل من المنزل - Working From Home @workremotelyfreelance · 64,656 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
أنَس. @MSA8H1 · 29,949 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
مَوْرِد. @mawrid0 · 67,743 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
استروجينات / أ. خلود الغفري @estrogenat · 27,013 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 October 2026
قناة الدروس | أكاديمية أساور الأنثوية @asawir10 · 35,367 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
أبو عمر || سامر إيبش @aboomarsamer1 · 40,460 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
المفقود من تراث شيخ العمود @shikhalamood · 44,744 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
شُرُوْحُ الْسُّنَّة - أَحْمَد السَّيِّد @shrou7alsunnah · 247,577 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
دار منار الفكر للنشر والتوزيع @FikirManar · 40,240 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
براء ! @baraagk · 52,632 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
خواطر وماجريات | أحمد السيد @khawatir_alsayed · 70,184 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
قناة شريف علي @Sherif_Aly · 88,781 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
قناة قُصَيّ عاصِم العُسَيلي @QusayAlosaily · 126,155 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
التزكية @ALTazkiah · 21,771 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
صوتيات د. خالد أبوشادي 🔊 @khaledabushadii · 35,089 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
قناة أحمد عامر @ahmad_e_b · 62,210 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
قنَاة إِسفَار @isfa1r · 79,658 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
الأنشطَة العامَّة @alanshitaleama1 · 110,157 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Mohammed ElGhaleez @moh_elghaleez · 122,947 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
قناة أحمد بن يوسف السيد @alsayed_ah · 511,226 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 August 2026
كوثر الجمعة @Kawtharaljumah · 21,715 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
تلاوات الشيخ أحمد السيد @tilawat_Alsayed · 29,101 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
قناة حسن الحسيني @husaini76 · 93,996 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 129 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ميمنة | أين الربان؟” (@maymanaplatform), 25,448 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maymanaplatform.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.