Доктор Никита
Путеводитель https://t.me/tolstota/359
Журнал Био @TheBioJournal
Отзывы @waves_nk
Консультация https://bit.ly/Dok-Nik-Help
Предложения [email protected]
Created
19 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,021–24,040 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:08
24,023
-3
13 Aug 2026, 04:55
24,026
-5
12 Aug 2026, 03:45
24,031
-3
11 Aug 2026, 04:41
24,034
-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:31
24,036
-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:14
24,038
+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:22
24,037
+4
6 Aug 2026, 08:00
24,033
no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:04
24,033
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 24,023 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,980
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
21 (29 January 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
19,920
Reactions total
550
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
25
Videos
5
Links
882
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
41m 16s
Average length
20m 38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,840 reactions across 21 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,529
39.8%
🔥
1,069
27.8%
❤🔥
789
20.5%
🙏
132
3.44%
🤝
96
2.50%
custom 5206607081334906820
51
1.33%
🤗
42
1.09%
🤔
30
0.781%
🏆
23
0.599%
💯
23
0.599%
🕊
13
0.339%
😁
13
0.339%
🤬
11
0.286%
🤯
8
0.208%
⚡
7
0.182%
🎉
2
0.052%
😈
2
0.052%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,840reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 21 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tolstota. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 January 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🛡️Что помогает выздороветь
Полагаю, вы на этой планете не ради цифры в некрологе и цените сам процесс жизни. Оптимальное здоровье — единственное, что делает бытие приятным и позволяет взять от жизни желаемое.
🏋🏻♂️Выздоровление возвращает человеку власть, поэтому требует усилий, ибо властью никто не делится. Как добрые, наивные люди, вы полагаете, что в медпроме все только и думают, как бы вам помочь. А в реальност…
🥩Мясо выбора
При нормальных условиях содержания свинья и птица почти не уступают жвачным по биологической ценности. При массовом производстве мясо жвачных заметно превосходит курицу и свинину.
✔️Даже на кривой фабричной диете в мясе коров умеренная концентрация биодизеля. Ибо токсикологически, их организм является сложным фильтром. Комплексная пищеварительная система длительно и тщательно перерабатывает грубую раст…
🌗Что мешает найти своё питание
Пролог: С чего начинается питание
Продолжу о заблуждениях, прожитых на пути восстановления качества жизни. Замечаю у тех, кто обращается за помощью. Актуально тем, кто ценит свободу и самостоятельность. Следовать не призываю.
I. Правильное/Неправильное
Если речь о состоянии здоровья и физической форме, выгодным отношением к питанию является техническое. Рацион можно измерить, просчи…
☠️Вред интервального голодания
(Запретное)
Возвращаем мою собственность, что была неправомерно удалена с ют. И вы к этому тоже причастны — спасибо за поддержку в комментариях.
✏️Эссенция той прогулки стала ещё актуальнее. Чем громче заголовок, тем пристальнее нужно перепроверять содержание.
Новости о медицине, питании, т.п. можно просто перестать читать. Потому что теперь научные исследования публикуются в сенсац…
⚠️Массовая зачистка информации
За минувшую неделю, с помощью эксплуатации инструментов YouTube удалено 9 видео с моих каналов.
Их объединяют тематики: интервальное питание и кето диета.
Под предлогом нарушения конфиденциальности. Это подразумевает, что в контенте демонстрируются чьи-то приватные данные: паспорт, ID, адреса, счета, телефоны и т.п.
Пока восстанавливаем на ют, эти видео можно посмотреть в других мес…
🍍Тропические фрукты и чувствительный кишечник
В тропической Азии столкнулись с разными фруктами. Физиология и набитый опыт в консультировании людей с раздражёнными кишечниками очень пригодились. Поэтому мне средства из пищеварительного раздела аптечки не потребовались.
Зато пригодились спутникам. Как все нормальные люди, они стали есть всё и сразу. И получили различные спецэффекты, но без осложнений, слава Дарвину!…
☀️Испытание Солнцем: тест жировой гигиены
Предыстория: Солнцевыносливость и жировой сепаратизм
Довелось попасть под экваториальное Солнце. Ласковое, учитывая влажность. Но в этом коварство.
⛱Начал степенно: Солнцезащитный крем (SPF30), купаться только в одежде, пребывать в тени, выползать на свет после 17:00. Но вскоре подумал, что упускаю солидную возможность испытать свою хвалёную Солнцевыносливость.
На следующ…
🧰Путешествие: что взять в аптечку
Составил справочник по медикаментам, пригодным для туризма, путешествия, отпуска.
Разделы
I. Пищеварительный. Необходим, если отправляетесь в тёплые страны с непривычной кухней. Включает сорбенты, средства против диареи путешественника, противорвотные и пищеварительные помощники и т.д.. Затрагиваются и антибиотики.
Nota Bene! Важный раздел тем, у кого чувствительное пищеварение и у…
Когда я учился в Мед. Академии, был предмет "Гигиена", где давали знания и по питанию. То была очень базовая информация о витаминах, минералах, энергии и предназначалась она больше для профилактики, чем лечения.
В основе так называемой "нутрициологии" те же самые знания из гигиены питания. На современный лад, с новыми терминами, новыми и псевдоновыми технологиями, в свежей, сверкающей упаковке.
Вскоре нутрициологию…
📌Сегодня вышел подкаст с моим участием для клиники MOZG
Если желаете продолжение, то сообщите нам об этом в комментариях с указанием интересующей темы.
Ссылка: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGZwdU3AVcU
🔴Часть II
👍121🔥49custom 52066070813349068209🏆3🤔1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @tolstota. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 30,470 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доктор Никита | Dr. Nik” (@tolstota), 24,023 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tolstota.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.