Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Секира Лектора

Channel

Секира Лектора

@lecturerhistory

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24,493subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001186498975
TypeChannel
Username@lecturerhistory
DescriptionНа страже истории. Группа ВК https://vk.com/lecturerhistory Организатор @Politikov Мастер над заметкой @DenisGuy
Created20 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lecturerhistory

Growth

24,49324,52924,5116 August 2026 — 24,529 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,529 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,526 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,518 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,513 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,509 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,510 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,502 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,497 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,493 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,488–24,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:1824,493-4
14 Aug 2026, 02:1424,497-5
12 Aug 2026, 23:2424,502-8
11 Aug 2026, 22:2424,510+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:4124,509-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:0324,513-5
8 Aug 2026, 13:3024,518-8
7 Aug 2026, 12:0024,526-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:0024,529no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:5724,529first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 24,493 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,270
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held38 (28 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total162,120
Reactions total3,080
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,730
Videos
477
Links
1,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 52s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,602 reactions across 33 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍60623.3%
🔥37914.6%
35313.6%
😁35013.5%
😢2288.76%
🤬963.69%
👏823.15%
💯813.11%
🫡813.11%
🤮441.69%
🌚401.54%
🕊391.50%
🤡351.35%
230.884%
💩230.884%
🤣220.846%
👎210.807%
🤔140.538%
🙈130.5%
120.461%
18 further kinds602.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,080reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 38 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lecturerhistory. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,860 views50 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Паспорт вольного города Данцига 1920-1939 годы

35🔥8👍7

15 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈2,080 views43 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Вольная Данцигская республика. С началом Революционных войн в 1792 году Франция стала проводить экспансию в Западной и Центральной Европе, создавая на захваченных территориях свои дочерние республики. И даже после восшествия Наполеона Бонапарта на императорский престол эта политика продолжилась. Так, в 1807 году Наполеон отделил от Пруссии Данциг, создав там Данцигскую республику, или же вольный город Данциг. По ре

👍385

13 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈3,010 views90 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

«Мадам, не жалейте немецких матерей. Они бы истребили вас и вашу семью, если бы могли…» Французская открытка времен Первой мировой войны, 1917 год.

😢55💯10🔥10🕊7🤬3👎2🫡2😁1

13 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈3,160 views71 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Работа "Тигров" под Курском, июль 1943 года.

👍23🕊11🔥9💊8🤬7🫡63💩3

12 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈3,450 views126 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

«Истинные ценности» - рекламная кампания дома Louis Vuitton с Михаилом Горбачевым проезжающим мимо Берлинской стены, 2007 год.

🌚35🔥27🤮24😁14👍12👎7😡42

12 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈3,420 views43 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Следственный эксперимент на котором агент НКВД Рамон Меркадер показывает, как он убивал Льва Троцкого. 1940 год.

🫡207🔥5😢5🙉5👍1

12 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈3,410 views116 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Строители саркофага 4-го реактора на Чернобыльской АЭС, 1986 год.

😢64🫡3319

11 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈4,090 views65 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Набор из 15 сигаретных карточек из серии «Монеты всех наций» 1889 года. Компания W. Duke, Sons & Co.

👍51🥰6🗿43🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈4,060 views55 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Реконструкция римского лагеря легионеров в Неймегене (Нидерланды), около 100 г. н.э.

🔥3217👍6

11 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈4,920 views191 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Фото на паспорт. Паспорт выдан Украинской Народной Республикой в ​​1918 году.

😁125👏3212👍7🔥5🤮4👎31

10 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈4,000 views62 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Варианты флагов для Китайской Народной Республики, предложенные в 1949 году.

👏31😁14🤔54👍4💩2🙈2

10 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈3,830 views140 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

«Голосовать за коммунистов — значит голосовать за российскую оккупацию», Франция, 1951 год.

💯71🔥37👏9💩9🤣6😁4🤨31

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @lecturerhistory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 336,609 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Секира Лектора” (@lecturerhistory), 24,493 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lecturerhistory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.