Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net -481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,812–16,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 20:07
15,884
-50
8 Nov 2026, 14:39
15,934
-1
7 Nov 2026, 08:15
15,935
-2
6 Nov 2026, 11:16
15,937
-7
5 Nov 2026, 10:48
15,944
-3
4 Nov 2026, 09:11
15,947
-5
3 Nov 2026, 07:56
15,952
+1
2 Nov 2026, 11:08
15,951
-9
1 Nov 2026, 08:17
15,960
-8
31 Oct 2026, 08:17
15,968
-4
30 Oct 2026, 09:47
15,972
-5
29 Oct 2026, 08:30
15,977
-8
28 Oct 2026, 06:40
15,985
-1
27 Oct 2026, 04:58
15,986
-2
26 Oct 2026, 04:16
15,988
-7
25 Oct 2026, 05:30
15,995
-4
24 Oct 2026, 02:26
15,999
-6
23 Oct 2026, 01:39
16,005
-3
21 Oct 2026, 23:15
16,008
-6
20 Oct 2026, 16:38
16,014
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,060
Videos
≈91
Links
≈1,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,994 reactions across 20 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
491
24.6%
❤
266
13.3%
👍
226
11.3%
🔥
181
9.08%
😁
173
8.68%
💔
77
3.86%
😭
67
3.36%
😢
58
2.91%
🤔
47
2.36%
🤣
45
2.26%
🤡
42
2.11%
😱
35
1.76%
👎
32
1.60%
✍
27
1.35%
❤🔥
27
1.35%
🤷♂
25
1.25%
👌
24
1.20%
🤓
22
1.10%
⚡
14
0.702%
💩
14
0.702%
21 further kinds
101
5.07%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,994 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пока разного рода гетеродоксы вроде Сергея Глазьева, Олега Комолова или Павла Усанова живут в своем мирке, может казаться, что у них просто есть своя точка зрения, отличающаяся от мейнстримной. Беда в том, что время от времени они выбираются на свет божий, в большой мир и начинают играть во взрослую экономику. Они слышали, что есть математика, а еще регрессии с данными гонять можно. При этом квалификации им явно не х…
Мне уже приходилось писать, что неожиданный, хотя и неполный успех автопроизводителей из Китая связан с тем, что меняется технологическая основа автомобилестроения. Поскольку двигатель внутреннего сгорания заменяется электродвигателем, накопленная старыми производителями экспертиза в двигателях первого типа перестает играть защитную роль от новичков-конкурентов. В такой ситуации на рынок могут зайти те, кто еще вчера…
Читатели, полагаю, помнят, что зимой 2023 – 2024 гг. презентация первого издания моей «Русской ловушки» была запрещена в Высшей школе экономики, а затем в петербургском Доме журналиста. Поэтому сегодня, когда вышло новое издание – значительно большим тиражом, да, к тому же, с электронным вариантом и аудио вариантом, который вскоре должен быть готов, – у меня есть основания радоваться не только самому появлению книги …
Европейцы хотят больше возобновляемых источников энергии, даже если это приведет к увеличению счетов за электроэнергию
https://www.politico.eu/article/poll-europeans-back-renewables-despite-higher-energy-costs/
Согласно новому опросу POLITICO European Pulse, проведенному в шести европейских странах, европейцы в подавляющем большинстве поддерживают переход на возобновляемые источники энергии: двое из пяти заявили, ч…
Когда восточный блок только развалился, основным претендентом на звание будущего экономического чемпиона была Венгрия. Польша была бедной даже по меркам стран того блока, СЭВ. Она вышла коммунизма в особенно неважном состоянии и с плохими вводными. Фаст-форвард 35 лет, и Польша стала экономическим колоссом на этом пространстве, а Венгрия волочится рядом. Заслуга в этом не только Виктора Орбана, но, конечно, его в пер…
Целенаправленное выдавливание с рынка мелких провайдеров — это не какой-то новый тренд. Даже на графике в оригинальном посте видно, что число действующих лицензий стало падать после 2016 года, когда был принят «пакет Яровой»: законодательные изменения, в частности, обязали операторов связи хранить данные пользователей в течение трех лет. В 2019 году был принят закон о «суверенном интернете», который обязал операторов…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @longviewecon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @longviewecon as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 16 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Григорий Баженов @furydrops · 28,184 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Politeconomics @politeconomics · 20,981 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 September 2026
Деньги и песец @moneyandpolarfox · 50,922 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
Evening Prophet @eveningprophet · 19,092 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 October 2026
Василий Тополев @vasil_topolev · 44,513 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Толкователь @tolk_tolk · 126,403 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Proeconomics @proeconomics · 68,791 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Время госзакупок @zakupki_time · 24,748 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Книжный импорт @importknig · 35,476 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Data distributor @sterngang · 21,175 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 October 2026
Бла-бла-номика @blablanomika · 46,622 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
TruEcon @truecon · 26,638 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
ECWORLD NEWS @ecworldnews · 27,710 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Хулиномика @hoolinomics · 98,609 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД @whalesgohigh · 61,504 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Стальной шлем @stahlhelm · 20,635 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
MMI @russianmacro · 101,987 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
ИНФОГРАФ : Экономика и финансы @infografo · 21,318 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Пробковый шлем @pithhelmet · 23,215 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Русский экономизм @russianeconomism · 76,655 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Твердые цифры @xtxixty · 20,209 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
Гусь Василий под тополем @gus_vasili · 38,126 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Если быть точным @tochno_st · 19,605 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
One Big Union @one_big_union · 20,018 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Экономика долгого времени” (@longviewecon), 15,884 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/longviewecon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.