Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Redroom Text

@redroomtext

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

75,756subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001413577359
TypeChannel
Username@redroomtext
Created6 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/redroomtext

Growth

75,75675,85275,8046 August 2026 — 75,840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 75,846 subscribers8 August 2026 — 75,852 subscribers9 August 2026 — 75,832 subscribers10 August 2026 — 75,819 subscribers11 August 2026 — 75,776 subscribers12 August 2026 — 75,762 subscribers13 August 2026 — 75,756 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,742–75,866 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:1775,756-6
12 Aug 2026, 11:3375,762-14
11 Aug 2026, 10:3275,776-43
10 Aug 2026, 08:2075,819-13
9 Aug 2026, 06:4275,832-20
8 Aug 2026, 04:3575,852+6
7 Aug 2026, 03:3175,846+6
6 Aug 2026, 05:0675,840first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.5%
avg views ÷ 75,756 subscribers
Avg views / post
29,900
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held28 (3 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total538,100
Reactions total11,319
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16,462 reactions across 28 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,22231.7%
🔥3,89223.6%
😁2,22913.5%
👍1,84611.2%
🤔7904.80%
🤣7014.26%
❤‍🔥4392.67%
🦄3992.42%
😱3171.93%
💔2601.58%
🤷‍♂2341.42%
🤯1330.808%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,462reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC≈15,300 views398 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ну а пока я собираюсь с мыслями и набрасываю контент-план (ха, ну конечно, ага) на тему того, о чем вам порассказывать в первую очередь, принесу вам немного музыки, которую вы скорее всего не слышали, но которая большинству из вас (привет, ровеснички) наверняка понравится. Мы все с вами знаем, что геройская серия и в частности ее третья часть – это настоящий восточноевропейский феномен. Нигде в мире эти игры не попу

228🔥99👍27❤‍🔥24🦄8😁5🤣4🤯3

10 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC≈16,500 views538 reactionsread 13 August 2026

эта функция — это уже слишком

😁364💔105🤣20🤯20🤷‍♂7🦄6👍5😱5

10 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTCviews —269 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣193💔34😁20😱13🤯6🤷‍♂3

10 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈16,800 views840 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Запилил чатик для комментариев, как и обещал. Ну и буду расширять тематику канала, потому что канал Редрума был зарегистрирован на ютубе уже 12 (ДВЕНАДЦАТЬ) лет назад и за все это время ограничивать себя строго всемирной историей немножечко поднадоело. Тем более, что, среди прочего, я вообще-то еще гик, путешественник, меломан и любитель крафтача. Исторические сюжеты, конечно, никуда не денутся, а уж на ютуб-канале в

502❤‍🔥151🔥86👍60🦄17😱8🤔6🤷‍♂6

10 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTCviews —317 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣195😱53🦄21🔥12🤯11😁87👍6

9 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈18,900 views377 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bersaglierihistory

​​Зачем Мелони поссорилась с Мадридом 30 июля больше семидесяти тысяч человек перешли из Марокко в испанский анклав Сеута. Уже на следующий день почти все вернулись обратно. До континентальной Европы не добрался никто, и Италию эта история никак не затронула. Тем не менее с 1 августа правительство Мелони на месяц вернуло пограничный контроль с Испанией, а следом продвинуло письмо двадцати двух европейских лидеров,

🔥19378🤔52🦄28❤‍🔥9👍6🤷‍♂6💔3

9 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈18,300 views248 reactionsread 13 August 2026

если кому интересна тема конфликта итальянских властей с испанскими по поводу наплыва из Марокко — вот ребята объяснили, к чему был весь этот кринж. а то много дурных новостей ходит и истерики по поводу якобы введения границы между Испанией и Италией и воплей о конце Шенгена. к слову, так называемый пограничный контроль в Италии по сути никак ничего не изменил в реальной процедуре пересечения границы

🔥146🤔60👍279🦄6

8 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈21,300 views559 reactionsread 13 August 2026

о, еще про мемное — тут на гудсторис, оказывается, видос про гарпий вышел, буду смотреть сейчас (это, кстати, не реклама) если вы не в курсе, о чем я — с год назад на ютубе попался вот этот канал. тут чувак, археолог (кажется) берет всяких мифологических зверюг из всем известной компуктерной стратегии (и не только зверюг — был видос про башню марлетто, например) и рассказывает, как мы воообще дошли до жизни такой. ну

328🔥108🦄68👍45🤔4🤯4❤‍🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC≈20,500 views654 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Такие мемы люблю

295😁227👍34🤔27🤷‍♂26🤯19🤣11🦄9

31 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC≈39,500 views769 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Откуда в Средние века взялись юристы? Около 1088 года группа любознательных студентов сформировала кружок по интересам — "Студию", миссией которой стало возрождение и применения римского права. Вскоре новости об инициативной группе, которая изучает древний кодекс Юстиниана, разошлась сначала по окрестностями, потом по всей Италии, а потом и по всей Европе. Студентов, которые вскоре станут первыми юристами, стали наз

👍428198🔥91🦄16❤‍🔥11🤔8🤯7😁5

31 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC≈32,500 views736 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @whalesgohigh

Пока марокканцы штурмом берут испанскую границу, я вспомнил, что как раз недавно читал кое-что занятное о миграционной политике: The civil rights granted by urban law . . . included a rational trial procedure, with judgement by peers rather than proof by ordeal or trial by combat. There were to be no arbitrary arrests and no imprisonment without legal process. Body attachment for debt was prohibited. Types of punish

😁275🤣171120👍69🤔45🦄18❤‍🔥12🤷‍♂10

30 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC≈27,600 views107 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🦄 VPN не должен становиться отдельной задачей на каждый день 🦄 GnuVPN автоматически подбирает протокол и помогает сохранять стабильное подключение при переходе между домашней сетью, мобильным интернетом и публичным Wi-Fi. 🕤 6 лет на рынке 🕤 Более 1000 серверов в 55 странах 🕤 До 5 устройств на одном аккаунте 🕤 Все привычные приложения продолжают работать 🏷️ Попробуй бесплатно в течение 7 дней → GnuVPN

🤷‍♂43👍3512🔥9❤‍🔥3🤯2🦄2🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @redroomtext. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTCAnonymous Poll6,810 voters approx.

?

  1. блажь, делай82%
  2. блажь, не делай18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 103,120 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Это Файб
@etofaib · 203,324
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Redroom Text” (@redroomtext), 75,756 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redroomtext.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.