Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,660–76,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 07:20
75,931
-30
17 Sept 2026, 07:41
75,961
+34
15 Sept 2026, 10:00
75,927
+25
13 Sept 2026, 22:19
75,902
+104
12 Sept 2026, 06:17
75,798
+4
9 Sept 2026, 22:38
75,794
+11
6 Sept 2026, 16:38
75,783
+7
4 Sept 2026, 04:36
75,776
-6
2 Sept 2026, 17:45
75,782
-10
1 Sept 2026, 14:35
75,792
-12
31 Aug 2026, 12:58
75,804
-5
30 Aug 2026, 12:03
75,809
-21
29 Aug 2026, 13:03
75,830
+1
28 Aug 2026, 10:47
75,829
+10
27 Aug 2026, 08:09
75,819
+4
26 Aug 2026, 06:27
75,815
-3
25 Aug 2026, 05:27
75,818
-13
24 Aug 2026, 05:33
75,831
-4
22 Aug 2026, 12:18
75,835
-12
21 Aug 2026, 05:56
75,847
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.1%
avg views ÷ 75,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,700
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
54 (3 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
425,400
Reactions total
10,004
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 01:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
636
Videos
10
Links
512
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34,976 reactions across 54 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,929
28.4%
🔥
7,312
20.9%
😁
5,818
16.6%
🤣
4,198
12.0%
👍
3,317
9.48%
🤔
1,077
3.08%
❤🔥
828
2.37%
🦄
809
2.31%
😱
535
1.53%
💔
485
1.39%
🤯
383
1.10%
🤷♂
285
0.815%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,976 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
История Америки через GTA
Оказывается, пока мы тут все ждали шестую часть, в Университете Теннесси в январе запустили спецкурс Grand Theft America: U.S. History Since 1980 through the GTA Video Games.
Конечно, историю можно изучать разными способами. Читать книги, слушать лекции, допрашивать ллмки или прямо на месте событий в ходе путешествий (тем более, что в наши дни это совсем не сложно – в конце-концов, билеты …
Тематическая плюшевая игрушка для канала по военной истории? Именно так!
Этот мишка во время ПМВ принадлежал британскому авиатору Уильяму Макланахану (он, конечно, шотландец, поэтому и игрушка в соответствующем прикиде).
Макланахан брал мишку в полеты в качестве счастливого талисмана – подобное, как ни странно, было в Первую мировую достаточно распространенным делом. Авиация в то время была занятием крайне опасным, …
Вы же когда-нибудь натыкались на эти картины художника Константина Васильева? Либо в интернете, либо на книжных обложках (ими почему-то любят иллюстрировать книги по истории и славянскому язычеству). Я вот давно с картинами знаком, и был уверен, что Константин Васильев – это какой-то художник из 90х, член общества «Память». В ту эпоху такой стиль бы вписался бы идеально, согласитесь.
И только в сегодня лет я узнал, …
Про Крестовые походы и то, почему арабскому миру на них в целом наплевать
Видите ли, тот же Саладин очень мало знал о франках, и… это его СОВЕРШЕННО не волновало. Крестовые походы были в значительной степени западно-европейской идеей-фикс. И, например, монгольское нашествие оказало гораздо более драматическое влияние на мусульман, чем крестовые походы.
Британский и американский историк-востоковед Бернард Льюис утве…
Я делаю этот канал уже (подумать только) 12 лет! ДВЕНАДЦАТЬ! Я сдавал один из наших первых видосов в качестве дипломного проекта, а сейчас это моя основная работа много лет, да и в целом изменилось все вокруг. И когда я такое осознаю, то становится понятно, что скорее всего мое ощущение себя подростком (ну, обычное дело для человека, перешагнувшего планку в 30 лет) – не совсем корректное. И вообще неплохо бы чекать в…
Это настолько мощно, что заслуживает комментария.
1. Литва в 1380 году не была католической. Литовские князья и сами литовцы оставались язычниками, входившие в Великое княжество русские земли - православными. В 1384 году под нажимом своей русской матери князь Ягайло заключил договор с Дмитрием Донским, предполагавший крещение Литвы в православие и женитьбу Ягайло на дочери Донского. Но через год Ягайло передумал и ж…
НОВОЕ ВИДЕО!
В Советском Союзе довольно часто снимали кино, а потом принимали решение не выпускать его в прокат. Это явление можно громко назвать «запрещённым кино», знатоки чаще используют слово «полочное», но сути это не меняет: многие фильмы не доходили до зрителя, причём нередко по неожиданным причинам. В этом ролике я исследую самые главные полочные фильмы, цензурные механизмы и (с некоторым опасением!) саму ре…
👍223❤🔥91❤45🔥22🤔13🤣7🦄6
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @redroomtext. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД @whalesgohigh · 61,668#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GEO @GEOSHOW · 77,794 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Это Файб @etofaib · 202,870 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
История и истории @historygothy · 20,829 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
Василий Тополев @vasil_topolev · 44,432 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Karfagen @karfagen_official_te · 35,341 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Virginia Bēowulf | английский язык @v_beowulf · 40,046 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Пробковый шлем @pithhelmet · 23,201 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД @whalesgohigh · 61,668 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
ПостРоссия @PostRussiaTelegram · 36,540 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Секира Лектора @lecturerhistory · 24,494 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Грег @gregjgeek · 23,197 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
Хочу домой - Путешествия, в которые вы не поедете @hochu_domoj · 30,198 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU @antropogenez_ru · 36,383 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Parfenon @leonidparfenov_official · 77,475 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Dagon @dagon_official · 25,717 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Григорий Баженов @furydrops · 28,365 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Другая История @historyzx · 40,694 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Всё как у зверей / радио Тимонова @timonova · 20,427 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 September 2026
Закат Империи • Время и деньги • Андрей Аксёнов @zakat_podcast · 31,069 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Космос просто @cosmosprosto · 60,877 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Мудреныч @moodrenych · 25,461 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Физика от Побединского @physfrompobed · 25,906 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Латынь по-пацански @latinpopacanski · 23,666 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
ПостНаука @postnauka · 21,797 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Redroom Text” (@redroomtext), 75,931 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redroomtext.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.