Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

XM

@khach_mach

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,280subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001076466368
TypeChannel
Username@khach_mach
Created13 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khach_mach

Growth

1,2801,2831,281.56 August 2026 — 1,283 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,283 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,281 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,280–1,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:571,280-1
9 Aug 2026, 07:121,281-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:511,283no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:511,283first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 1,280 subscribers
Avg views / post
353
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total7,054
Reactions total155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4529.0%
💯4227.1%
😁2918.7%
2214.2%
👎42.58%
🤡31.94%
🤯31.94%
🤝21.29%
👏10.645%
😭10.645%
😱10.645%
🤬10.645%
🤷‍♂10.645%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC55 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tolk_tolk

У западных социальных антропологов всё больше вижу осознания опасности того, что мужчины-аутасйдеры лишаются возможности создания семьи и даже просто отношений с женщинами. В истории уже были и есть примеры, к чему это может привести – примерно так обстояло и обстоит с мужчинами-аутсайдерами в обществах с полигамией, где ресурсные мужчины забирают себе не одну женщину, а больше. Если в исламе ресурсный мужчина имеет

😭1

6 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @regionalcenterDS

Эдуард Аракелян, RCDS: Публикация издания «Hetq», основанная на свидетельстве участника 25-дневных военно-учебных сборов, стала поводом для внеплановой проверки одной из боевых позиций начальником ГШ ВС РА Э. Асряном. Автор публикации описал целый комплекс проблем, включая недостатки инженерного оборудования позиций, организационные просчёты при проведении учебных сборов, назначение военнослужащих на должности, не

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC274 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Уже который год, клоуны раасказывают, что стали независимыми, суверенными и фиг знает еще какими, после сдачи Арцаха, рассказывают, что реформы в их армии беспрецедентны, гей-парад какой-то устраивают с показом беспилотников с Али и индийским хламом, убеждая несмышленных граждан РА в том, что реформы капикяна, новые союзники, армия уже не та, что при бывших рабах Москвы, и все такое.. А в итоге вот это. Сравните,

👍3💯3

5 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC253 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @artjockey

Posted without readable text

💯1😁1

4 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC345 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вот как забавно получается, , Лори был грузинский в т. ч. и Ташир,, Арцах - азерский, Арарат - турецкий.. и так далее по списку заявлений даже не азеров, а каких-то пропашиняновских персонажей, которые спать не могут , и предлагают нам\вам рефлексировать о слезах азербайджанских матерей. И вот читаешь и смотришь на все это, в т.ч. как молча сносит армянский плепс, и задумываешься, а может азеры и турки правы, ког

👍93🤷‍♂1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC344 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если кто не знал, то новый спикер т.н. НС РА Рубен Рубинян, согласно его официальной биографии, проходил стажировку в Стамбуле, где проживал с 2016 по 2017 год. Я не на что не намекаю, лишь восхищаюсь последовательностью турецкой политики, и офигеваю от глубины дна, которого не может никак достичь историческая родина и ее политикум.

👍11🤡31🤬1

3 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC299 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @justaddfashions

Потому что БДСМ министерство Армении во главе с нждеафобкой, по завету верховного шиза и с молчаливого согласия гоев, решило однажды, что нет никакой истории армянского народа, есть лишь история Армении. Вся хтонь оттуда. В том числе когда в угоду своим мамкиным амбициям названия улиц меняют.

💯21

3 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC415 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Просто Амирян был бакинец, а как известно, бакинцы это шуртвацы, и вообще у всех у них карабахские корни... Не гоже в суверенной, от здравого смысла, Армении иметь улицы названные в честь всяких унтерменьшев Ну, а если серьезно, то популяции аборигенов населяющие страны постсовка и прочие отсталые территории нашего шарика, так и не поняли, что любая история страны нуждается в увековечении, и нельзя убирать одни т

5👍1👎1

3 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC337 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Когда в одном ливанце больше достоинства, чем во всей партии Гражданский Договор.

💯19👍3😁2

2 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC360 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Собственно, что и требовалось доказать . Многие пишут, что с помощью Марокко, США и Израиль наказывают Испанию за ее позицию по поводу действий Израиля в Газе, читай Палестины, а так же войны, которую развязали те же США и Израиль в отношении Ирана. Но, на мой взгляд,, все немного сложнее. я бы посоветовал прочитать этот пост Если кратко его суммаризировать, то Главная причина «экономического чуда» левого правитель

2

2 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC638 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Просто напомню, что человек пришел к власти, свергнув Сержа Саргсяна, под лозунгом, что никто не должен находится у власти более двух сроков.

😁9👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khach_mach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 146,532 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“XM” (@khach_mach), 1,280 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khach_mach.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.